DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@linaro.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ixgbe TX function selection
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:51:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8DD26BC@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D5EB07.9070706@linaro.org>

Hi, Zoltan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss
> Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 3:19 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] ixgbe TX function selection
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've noticed that ixgbe_set_tx_function() selects the non-SG function
> even if (dev->data->scattered_rx == 1). That seems a bit dangerous, as
> you can turn that on inadvertently when you don't set max_rx_pkt_len and
> buffer size in certain ways. I've learnt it in the hard way, as my
> segmented packets were leaking memory on the TX path, which doesn't
> cries if you send out segmented packets.
> How should this case be treated? Assert on the non-SG TX side for the
> 'next' pointer? Or turning on SG if RX has it? It doesn't seem to be a
> solid way as other interfaces still can have SG turned on.
> 

If you look into the ixgbe_set_tx_function, you will find tx function
selection is decided by the tx_flags on queue configure, which is
passed by rte_eth_txconf. So even you set dev->data->scattered_rx to 1,
if the tx_flags is ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMULTSEGS, ixgbe_xmit_pkts_simple is
still selected as tx function. So, you'd better to set tx_flags=0, and have a try.

> Regards,
> 
> Zoltan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-10  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-01 19:18 Zoltan Kiss
2016-03-04  1:47 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2016-03-04 11:59   ` Zoltan Kiss
2016-03-10  7:51 ` Wu, Jingjing [this message]
2016-03-17 17:10   ` Zoltan Kiss
2016-03-18  0:45     ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2016-03-18 13:33       ` Zoltan Kiss
2016-03-19 15:46         ` Ananyev, Konstantin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8DD26BC@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=zoltan.kiss@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).