DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" <ssujith@cisco.com>
To: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 04:36:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9C4CB4066E545D4D9D728B3238E19CA501496A96@xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52376A89.4000504@6wind.com>

Hi Vincent,

Sincere thanks to you for the email !  This is very helpful.
I think I'll go with Rump kernel stack to start with, and might think
about the other options later.

Regards,
-Sujith

On 17/09/13 2:01 AM, "Vincent JARDIN" <vincent.jardin@6wind.com> wrote:

>Hi Sujith,
>
>NetBSD/Rump is the only open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK. Some people
>may have tried to port LwIP too. As far as we know, only 6WIND has a
>robust and fully compliant stack which provides socket APIs to the
>applications on top of the DPDK. I'd be pleased to get a list of options
>for the DPDK too:
>   - Rump/NetBSD thanks to Antti
>   - maybe LwIP TBC
>   - 6WINDGate's fast path TCP/IP stack
>and to list them on dpdk.org.
>
>My 2 cents,
>   Vincent
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm new to DPDK and this group.
>>
>> In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a
>> little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing.
>> Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with
>> DPDK libraries and applications?  Quick googling gave a few names
>>(6Wind,
>> rump kernel tcp/ip stack, etc).  But some wise words from the group
>>could
>> go a long way in helping me out.
>>
>> Thanks in advance !
>> -Sujith
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-17  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-16 20:31 [dpdk-dev] " Vincent JARDIN
2013-09-17  4:36 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith) [this message]
2013-09-17 23:15   ` [dpdk-dev] " Wiles, Roger Keith
2013-09-19  4:37     ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-17 13:09 [dpdk-dev] " Gil Hellmann
2013-09-19  4:33 ` [dpdk-dev] " Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2013-09-05  8:40 Sujith Sankar (ssujith)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9C4CB4066E545D4D9D728B3238E19CA501496A96@xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com \
    --to=ssujith@cisco.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=vincent.jardin@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).