From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ssujith@cisco.com>
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9BF1F3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:32:44 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
 d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=371; q=dns/txt; s=iport;
 t=1379565203; x=1380774803;
 h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id:
 content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
 bh=5ERoME9JY2quF2uWknrBzu/jJOpeL3nnCQ4JJR+GTK0=;
 b=aunSBxtxTo3u+nXc1McAFTKEgOIjat5tMy0t/e3gzMHdRJ0od/9PFYVx
 58WWGJaC9ehF4FcM1qo6UrY0EYpNYOOKlYDcErod5vIs1INg/488SjLYG
 qNVT9Zb5HpIAwxqU/SKV352o4Bi1pLGzzJv98FMCeNDkFe2LqaKcOLmLA A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAEt+OlKtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABbgweBCoJjvkqBIxZ0gicBBDpRAQgiFEIlAgQBEgiHe7pHjzY4gx6BAAOpb4Mkgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,934,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="261723800"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153])
 by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2013 04:33:22 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76])
 by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8J4XMLU030804
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL);
 Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:33:22 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.2.36]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com
 ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004;
 Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:33:22 -0500
From: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" <ssujith@cisco.com>
To: Gil Hellmann <gil.hellmann@rogers.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev]  Re: TCP/IP stack - options
Thread-Index: AQHOs6cz/dn8LJhXbkybZNJ6iZ/Ie5nNK3MA
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:33:21 +0000
Message-ID: <9C4CB4066E545D4D9D728B3238E19CA501499252@xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A9CF4849-8E10-425D-908D-7652DE6B7DFB@rogers.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416
x-originating-ip: [173.39.25.214]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <D283D60C6C776E4C86C7558B266D2BFB@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:32:44 -0000

Thank you Gil.

-Sujith

On 17/09/13 6:39 PM, "Gil Hellmann" <gil.hellmann@rogers.com> wrote:

>Hi Sujith,
>
>To add to the respond given by Mr. Jardin, Wind River also has commercial
>grade protocol stack that could be used with DPDK libraries and
>application, it is part of Wind Rivers' INP (Intelligent Networking
>Platform).
>
>Regards,
>Gil Hellmann