From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F016E58DB for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:36:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2685; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1379565443; x=1380775043; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=3TxrtaJSftMkPKZG3gDawLvGmLG7jPk6OjrMzaBJ36c=; b=EuNcKcZKlyRcu8JXyNzdX5yR3CYV4eWI/pJbOpUbexoecB+Jnmn0CoQ2 O/DeY+2E7JQHV6o203GxdeHdCooF+fwA8B0SbVftGJ3vv23x79XhhxTDT haB4Q+mAVhpXXtAhdf5xA3GfZZ4Gl/pMRBmubWupk6B0UrbW9hRpsjZwa 0=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAA9+OlKtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABYA4MHOFLBLYEjFnSCJQEBAQQ6OAEYAQgYChQJORQRAgQBEgiHewy6O44egRgLFhcRgw2BAAOUH4ULkEWDJIFxOQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,934,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="261721901" Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2013 04:37:21 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8J4bLAq014170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:37:21 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.2.36]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:37:21 -0500 From: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" To: "Wiles, Roger Keith" , "" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options Thread-Index: AQHOs/vYNka9/g+zgU+foCPL5snbhZnNK+SA Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:37:20 +0000 Message-ID: <9C4CB4066E545D4D9D728B3238E19CA50149926F@xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <6FE0E642-8D39-4A1A-B690-8788EC840E6A@windriver.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416 x-originating-ip: [173.39.25.214] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:36:44 -0000 Thanks Keith ! Your inputs are really helpful. I'll keep the contacts handy. Regards, -Sujith On 18/09/13 4:45 AM, "Wiles, Roger Keith" wrote: >Hi Sujith, > >Wind River also has a fully integrated TCP/IP stack with network >acceleration using DPKD with INP/AAE product. A few have ported lwIP to >DPDK, but these stacks are not fully integrated into the whole system >meaning the Linux host (at least I do not know of anyone that does). > >Wind River's INP product is a complete TCP/IP stack with many more >features and protocols backed by the largest embedded development company >in the world. We also have a very close relationship with Intel (as we >are wholly owned subsidiary of Intel) > >We have a patent pending socket layer acceleration design and many more >features. > >Please contact=20 >steve.konish@windriver.com or >Paul.Senyshyn@windriver.com for more >details.Keith Wiles, Principal Technologist for Networking member of the >CTO office, Wind River >direct 972.434.4136 mobile 940.213.5533 fax 000.000.0000 >[Powering 30 Years of >Innovation] > >On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Sujith Sankar (ssujith) >> wrote: > >Hi Vincent, > >Sincere thanks to you for the email ! This is very helpful. >I think I'll go with Rump kernel stack to start with, and might think >about the other options later. > >Regards, >-Sujith > >On 17/09/13 2:01 AM, "Vincent JARDIN" >> wrote: > >Hi Sujith, > >NetBSD/Rump is the only open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK. Some people >may have tried to port LwIP too. As far as we know, only 6WIND has a >robust and fully compliant stack which provides socket APIs to the >applications on top of the DPDK. I'd be pleased to get a list of options >for the DPDK too: > - Rump/NetBSD thanks to Antti > - maybe LwIP TBC > - 6WINDGate's fast path TCP/IP stack >and to list them on dpdk.org. > >My 2 cents, > Vincent > >Hi all, > >I'm new to DPDK and this group. > >In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a >little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing. >Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with >DPDK libraries and applications? Quick googling gave a few names >(6Wind, >rump kernel tcp/ip stack, etc). But some wise words from the group >could >go a long way in helping me out. > >Thanks in advance ! >-Sujith > > > >