From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E23B38E for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:15:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7RGJEwt027355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-MBB.corp.ad.wrs.com ([169.254.1.18]) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.189.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:19:15 -0700 From: "Wiles, Roger Keith" To: Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] Clang Scan build results Thread-Index: AQHPwgl9ucruR2NTEUKgGoCehJGf5ZvlB1qAgAAHsYCAAATZAIAAAqoA Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:19:14 +0000 Message-ID: <9E26D17F-C54B-40C7-9A5C-A98C69C723F9@windriver.com> References: <2986167.y8P4CbtqGc@xps13> In-Reply-To: <2986167.y8P4CbtqGc@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.25.40.162] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8465EE24A4BFA64DBB90F0197A3A3F82@local> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Clang Scan build results X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:15:13 -0000 Not sure why cite marks are missing again :-( I hope they come back some da= y. I still must not have Mac Mail configure correctly, but I only really se= e a couple of options. If someone has a solution let me know. On Aug 27, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Thomas Monjalon w= rote: > 2014-08-27 15:52, Wiles, Roger Keith: >> I groped around on the Coverity site and did not find any statement abou= t >> being free to open source, but I may have just missed it. >=20 > It's here: > https://scan.coverity.com >=20 > Some checks have been done with TrustInSoft Analyzer: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002365.html > Noticeable example: > http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=3D2612a4b935144accff If coverity is free then maybe that is one we need to use instead of scan-b= uild, but I still like running multiple tools to see which one does the bes= t and to report other types of issues. Just my opinion. >=20 > I didn't yet check all your clang report but about all the errors in > Intel base drivers, you should know that we prefer not fix them because > we try to keep it close from the Intel imports. It's Intel decision to fi= x > these base drivers errors and publish them here. Yes, I noticed the drivers had a few problems and were one of the files I h= ad to force scan-build work. >=20 > --=20 > Thomas Keith Wiles, Principal Technologist with CTO office, Wind River mobile 972-= 213-5533