DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com>,
	wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, beilei.xing@intel.com,
	adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] app/testpmd: fix the default RSS key configuration
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 19:36:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c4bba47-cedc-ce6d-02f2-053b4fa8ad8c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ca8988c-741f-d9e2-3f53-2c97fe64ee5b@huawei.com>

On 10/9/2020 12:59 PM, oulijun wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2020/9/30 21:36, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
>> On 9/24/2020 2:45 PM, Lijun Ou wrote:
>>> It use the NIC valid default RSS key instead of the testpmd
>>> dummy RSS key in the flow configuration when the RSS key is
>>> not specified in the flow rule. If the NIC RSS key is
>>> invalid, it will use testpmd dummy RSS key as the default
>>> key.
>>>
>>> Fixes: ac8d22de2394 ("ethdev: flatten RSS configuration in flow API")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> V3->V4:
>>> -fix checkpatch warning and shorter commit content.
>>>
>>> V2->V3:
>>> -fix checkpatch warning.
>>>
>>> V1->V2:
>>> -fix the commit.
>>> ---
>>>   app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
>>> index 6263d30..e6648da 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
>>> @@ -4312,6 +4312,7 @@ parse_vc_action_rss(struct context *ctx, const struct 
>>> token *token,
>>>           action_rss_data->queue[i] = i;
>>>       if (!port_id_is_invalid(ctx->port, DISABLED_WARN) &&
>>>           ctx->port != (portid_t)RTE_PORT_ALL) {
>>> +        struct rte_eth_rss_conf rss_conf = {0};
>>>           struct rte_eth_dev_info info;
>>>           int ret2;
>>> @@ -4322,6 +4323,13 @@ parse_vc_action_rss(struct context *ctx, const struct 
>>> token *token,
>>>           action_rss_data->conf.key_len =
>>>               RTE_MIN(sizeof(action_rss_data->key),
>>>                   info.hash_key_size);
>>> +
>>> +        rss_conf.rss_key_len = sizeof(action_rss_data->key);
>>> +        rss_conf.rss_key = action_rss_data->key;
>>> +        ret2 = rte_eth_dev_rss_hash_conf_get(ctx->port, &rss_conf);
>>> +        if (ret2 != 0)
>>> +            return ret2;
>>> +        action_rss_data->conf.key = rss_conf.rss_key;
>>
>> Do you need this last assignment at all?
>> 'rss_conf.rss_key' point to 'action_rss_data->key'
>> 'action_rss_data->conf.key' already point to 'action_rss_data->key'
>> so it just assigns same value back, no?
>>
> You need to call rte_eth_dev_rss_hash_conf_get to obtain the RSS hash key 
> configured in the hardware as the default key.
> Currently, the testpmd uses a key that is different from that configured in the 
> hardware after the testpmd is started as the default key when users crearte a 
> RSS flow rule without specifying a RSS hash key.
>

I got this part, I am saying why you have the following assignment:
"action_rss_data->conf.key = rss_conf.rss_key;"

'action_rss_data->conf.key' already points to 'action_rss_data->key' [1]

later 'rss_conf.rss_key' pointer points 'action_rss_data->key' [2]
This is used to fill the RSS key.

At this stage both 'action_rss_data->conf.key' & 'rss_conf.rss_key' are point to 
exact same address.
So what is the point of assigning 'action_rss_data->conf.key' to 'rss_conf.rss_key'?


[1]
  *action_rss_data = (struct action_rss_data){
    conf = (struct rte_flow_action_rss){
      ...
      .key = action_rss_data->key,
      ...
   }
   ...
  }


[2]
rss_conf.rss_key = action_rss_data->key;

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-09 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-10  1:51 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Lijun Ou
2020-09-22  9:51 ` Phil Yang
2020-09-22 13:50   ` oulijun
2020-09-22 15:44     ` Phil Yang
2020-09-24 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] RSS key use with testpmd Lijun Ou
2020-09-24 13:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] app/testpmd: fix the default RSS key configuration Lijun Ou
2020-09-29 15:35     ` Phil Yang
2020-09-30 12:57     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-09 11:55       ` oulijun
2020-10-09 18:27         ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-09 18:54           ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-30 13:36     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-09 11:59       ` oulijun
2020-10-09 18:36         ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2020-10-15 12:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Lijun Ou
2020-10-15 13:52       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-15 14:04         ` oulijun
2020-10-15 14:43           ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-15 16:05             ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-15 23:21               ` Ophir Munk
2020-10-15 23:53                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16  0:14                   ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-10-16  6:46                   ` Ophir Munk
2020-10-16 10:05                     ` oulijun
2020-10-16 15:13                       ` Ophir Munk
2020-10-16 10:04                   ` oulijun
2020-10-16 10:57                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 14:59                       ` Ophir Munk
2020-10-20  9:00                       ` oulijun
2020-10-20 10:02                         ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-20 13:35                           ` oulijun
2020-10-20 14:34                             ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-21  8:19                               ` oulijun
2020-10-21  9:38                                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-21 10:07                                   ` oulijun
     [not found]       ` <20201015195637.26476-1-robot@bytheb.org>
2020-10-16  9:39         ` [dpdk-dev] |WARNING| pw80899 " oulijun
2020-10-16  9:41           ` David Marchand
2020-09-30 13:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] RSS key use with testpmd Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-09 12:09     ` oulijun
2020-10-09 18:52       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-10  3:07         ` Phil Yang
2020-10-14  6:15         ` oulijun
2020-10-14  8:41           ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9c4bba47-cedc-ce6d-02f2-053b4fa8ad8c@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=oulijun@huawei.com \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).