DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 최익성 <pnk003@naver.com>
To: De Lara GuarchPablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] I have a problem in setting up DPDK 2.1.0 in Fedora OS release 20 (Heisenbug). I cannot r
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:01:40 +0900 (KST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d3f39f1cd6d917e5e74c12b73f90dd@cweb24.nm.nhnsystem.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8973C834EFC@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>

 Dear De Lara Guarch, Pablo.
 
I checked what you mentioned.
 
* Fedora Linux kernel version is as follows.
 
     $ uname -r (print kernel name)
     3.17.7-200.fc20.x86_64
 
     $ uname -a
     Linux sdnlab-k01 3.17.7-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 03:35:33 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 
     $ cat /proc/version
     Linux version 3.17.7-200.fc20.x86_64 (mockbuild@bkernel01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) (gcc version 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-7) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 03:35:33 UTC 2014
 
     $ rpm -q kernel
     kernel-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64
     kernel-3.17.7-200.fc20.x86_64
     kernel-3.15.6-200.fc20.x86_64
 
     $ cat /etc/redhat-release
     Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
 
 
* Vt-d seems to be enabled. I heard that the result values of 3 or 5 mean the virtualization activated.
 
     $ sudo rdmsr 0x3A
     5
 
And I have strange error during the yum update.
 
 
$ sudo yum update
 
--&gt; Finished Dependency Resolution
--&gt; Running transaction check
---&gt; Package aspell-en.x86_64 50:7.1-6.fc20 will be installed
---&gt; Package kernel-devel.x86_64 0:3.11.10-301.fc20 will be erased
---&gt; Package kernel-modules-extra.x86_64 0:3.11.10-301.fc20 will be erased
---&gt; Package kernel-modules-extra.x86_64 0:3.19.8-100.fc20 will be installed
--&gt; Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64 for package: kernel-modules-extra-3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64
--&gt; Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: kernel-modules-extra-3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64 (updates)
           Requires: kernel-uname-r = 3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64
           Installed: kernel-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64 (@anaconda)
               kernel-uname-r = 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64
           Installed: kernel-3.15.6-200.fc20.x86_64 (installed)
               kernel-uname-r = 3.15.6-200.fc20.x86_64
           Installed: kernel-3.17.7-200.fc20.x86_64 (@updates)
               kernel-uname-r = 3.17.7-200.fc20.x86_64
           Available: kernel-debug-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64 (fedora)
               kernel-uname-r = 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64+debug
           Available: kernel-debug-3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64 (updates)
               kernel-uname-r = 3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64+debug
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
 
 
* There are virtual bridge and virtual nic in the Fedora server.
 
$ ifconfig  or $ ifconfig -a
 
virbr0: flags=4099&lt;UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST&gt;  mtu 1500
        inet ?.?.?.?  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast ?.?.?.?
        ether 52:54:00:f2:70:98  txqueuelen 0  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
 
virbr0-nic: flags=4098&lt;BROADCAST,MULTICAST&gt;  mtu 1500
        ether 52:54:00:f2:70:98  txqueuelen 500  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
 
 
Thank you very much.
 
Sincerely Yours,
 
Ick-Sung Choi.
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo"&lt;pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com&gt; 
To: "???"&lt;pnk003@naver.com&gt;; "dev@dpdk.org"&lt;dev@dpdk.org&gt;; 
Cc: 
Sent: 2015-10-14 (수) 22:19:02
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] I have a problem in setting up DPDK 2.1.0 in Fedora OS release 20 (Heisenbug). I cannot r
 
Hi Ick-Sung,



&gt; * Fedora OS version : Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)

&gt; 

&gt; * gcc version : gcc (GCC) 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-7).

&gt; 

&gt; * Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680  10 cores, 64G bytes system memory.

&gt; * 2 2-port NIC cards, Intel® 82599ES 10 Gigabit Ethernet 2 port Controller.

&gt; SFI/SFP+. optical link. Hence there are 4 10 GbE ports.

&gt; 

&gt; * I attached DPDK setup script in my environment.



What is your kernel version? And also, can you check if you have VT-d enabled?



Thanks,

Pablo

&gt; 

&gt; 

&gt; Thank you very much.

&gt; 

&gt; Sincerely Yours,

&gt; 

&gt; Ick-Sung Choi.




  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-14  1:29 최익성
2015-10-14  1:38 ` Xu, Qian Q
2015-10-14  1:49 ` 최익성
2015-10-14 13:19   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2015-10-15  1:01     ` 최익성 [this message]
2015-10-15  8:02       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2015-10-15  8:10       ` Mcnamara, John
2015-10-15 23:46         ` 최익성
2015-10-19 14:48         ` 최익성

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9d3f39f1cd6d917e5e74c12b73f90dd@cweb24.nm.nhnsystem.com \
    --to=pnk003@naver.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).