From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Cc: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ethdev: fix race-condition of proactive error handling mode
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:25:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9dc5d714-07a4-c32e-e557-efe8e7fe2d16@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3c8dd66f915462e9b58defdb4e5aa1e@huawei.com>
On 2023/3/6 19:13, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>>>> In the proactive error handling mode, the PMD will set the data path
>>>>>>>>> pointers to dummy functions and then try recovery, in this period the
>>>>>>>>> application may still invoking data path API. This will introduce a
>>>>>>>>> race-condition with data path which may lead to crash [1].
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Although the PMD added delay after setting data path pointers to cover
>>>>>>>>> the above race-condition, it reduces the probability, but it doesn't
>>>>>>>>> solve the problem.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To solve the race-condition problem fundamentally, the following
>>>>>>>>> requirements are added:
>>>>>>>>> 1. The PMD should set the data path pointers to dummy functions after
>>>>>>>>> report RTE_ETH_EVENT_ERR_RECOVERING event.
>>>>>>>>> 2. The application should stop data path API invocation when process
>>>>>>>>> the RTE_ETH_EVENT_ERR_RECOVERING event.
>>>>>>>>> 3. The PMD should set the data path pointers to valid functions before
>>>>>>>>> report RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_SUCCESS event.
>>>>>>>>> 4. The application should enable data path API invocation when process
>>>>>>>>> the RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_SUCCESS event.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How this is solving the race-condition, by pushing responsibility to
>>>>>>> stop data path to application?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Exactly, it becomes application responsibility to make sure data-path is
>>>>>> stopped/suspended before recovery will continue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From documentation of the feature:
>>>>>
>>>>> ``
>>>>> Because the PMD recovers automatically,
>>>>> the application can only sense that the data flow is disconnected for a
>>>>> while and the control API returns an error in this period.
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to sense the error happening/recovering, as well as to restore
>>>>> some additional configuration, three events are available:
>>>>> ``
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like initial design is to use events mainly inform application
>>>>> about what happened and mainly for re-configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>> Although I am don't disagree to involve the application, I am not sure
>>>>> that is part of current design.
>>>>
>>>> I thought we all agreed that initial design contain some fallacies that
>>>> need to fixed, no?
>>>> Statement that with current rte_ethdev design error recovery can be done
>>>> without interaction with the app (to stop/suspend data/control path)
>>>> is the main one I think.
>>>> It needs some interaction with app layer, one way or another.
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What if application is not interested in recovery modes at all and not
>>>>>>> registered any callback for the recovery?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you saying there is no way for application to disable
>>>>>> automatic recovery in PMD if it is not interested
>>>>>> (or can't full-fill per-requesties for it)?
>>>>>> If so, then yes it is a problem and we need to fix it.
>>>>>> I assumed that such mechanism to disable unwanted events already exists,
>>>>>> but I can't find anything.
>>>>>> Wonder what would be the easiest way here - can PMD make a decision
>>>>>> based on callback return value, or do we need a new API to
>>>>>> enable/disable callbacks, or ...?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as I can see automatic recovery is not configurable by app.
>>>>>
>>>>> But that is not all, PMD sends events to application but PMD can't know
>>>>> if application is handling them or not, so with current design PMD can't
>>>>> rely on to app.
>>>>
>>>> Well, PMD invokes user provided callback.
>>>> One way to fix that problem - if there is no callback provided,
>>>> or callback returns an error code - PMD can assume that recovery
>>>> should not be done.
>>>> That is probably not the best design choice, but at least it will allow
>>>> to fix the problem without too many changes and introducing new API.
>>>> That could be sort of a 'quick fix'.
>>>> In a meanwhile we can think about new/better approach for that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -rc2 for 23.03 is a few days away.
>>>
>>> What do you think to have 'quick fix' as modifying how driver updates
>>> burst ops to prevent the race condition, for this release?
The 'quick fix', do you mean only update function pointer (without rxq setting) ?
Currently the PMDs which announced support "proactive error handling mode" already
do this.
>>>
>>> And plan a design update for the next release?
>> +1 on the overall approach.
>
> Yep, agree.
Hope for better solution.
And also, I notice only the openvswitch (from all open-source software which based-on DPDK)
registers RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET callback .
Therefore, hope we build a recovery framework at the DPDK SDK level and be compatible
with RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET and RTE_ETH_EVENT_ERR_RECOVERING mechanism.
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think driver should not rely on application for this, unless
>>>>>>> application explicitly says (to driver) that it is handling recovery,
>>>>>>> right now there is no way for driver to know this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it is visa-versa:
>>>>>> application should not enable auto-recovery if it can't meet
>>>>>> per-requeststies for it (provide appropriate callback).
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree on above, we are saying similar thing in different perspective.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, that's good we are on the same page.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, this patch introduce a driver internal function
>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_fp_ops_setup which used as an help function for PMD.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>> http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20230220060839.1267349-2-ashok.k.kaladi@intel.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fixes: eb0d471a8941 ("ethdev: add proactive error handling mode")
>>>>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst | 20 +++++++---------
>>>>>>>>> lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.c | 8 +++++++
>>>>>>>>> lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h | 10 ++++++++
>>>>>>>>> lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 32
>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++----------
>>>>>>>>> lib/ethdev/version.map | 1 +
>>>>>>>>> 5 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst
>>>>>>>>> b/doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst
>>>>>>>>> index c145a9066c..e380ff135a 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst
>>>>>>>>> @@ -638,14 +638,9 @@ different from the application invokes recovery
>>>>>>>>> in PASSIVE mode,
>>>>>>>>> the PMD automatically recovers from error in PROACTIVE mode,
>>>>>>>>> and only a small amount of work is required for the application.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -During error detection and automatic recovery,
>>>>>>>>> -the PMD sets the data path pointers to dummy functions
>>>>>>>>> -(which will prevent the crash),
>>>>>>>>> -and also make sure the control path operations fail with a return
>>>>>>>>> code ``-EBUSY``.
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>> -Because the PMD recovers automatically,
>>>>>>>>> -the application can only sense that the data flow is disconnected
>>>>>>>>> for a while
>>>>>>>>> -and the control API returns an error in this period.
>>>>>>>>> +During error detection and automatic recovery, the PMD sets the
>>>>>>>>> data path
>>>>>>>>> +pointers to dummy functions and also make sure the control path
>>>>>>>>> operations
>>>>>>>>> +failed with a return code ``-EBUSY``.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In order to sense the error happening/recovering,
>>>>>>>>> as well as to restore some additional configuration,
>>>>>>>>> @@ -653,9 +648,9 @@ three events are available:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ``RTE_ETH_EVENT_ERR_RECOVERING``
>>>>>>>>> Notify the application that an error is detected
>>>>>>>>> - and the recovery is being started.
>>>>>>>>> + and the recovery is about to start.
>>>>>>>>> Upon receiving the event, the application should not invoke
>>>>>>>>> - any control path function until receiving
>>>>>>>>> + any control and data path API until receiving
>>>>>>>>> ``RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_SUCCESS`` or
>>>>>>>>> ``RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_FAILED`` event.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> .. note::
>>>>>>>>> @@ -666,8 +661,9 @@ three events are available:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ``RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_SUCCESS``
>>>>>>>>> Notify the application that the recovery from error is successful,
>>>>>>>>> - the PMD already re-configures the port,
>>>>>>>>> - and the effect is the same as a restart operation.
>>>>>>>>> + the PMD already re-configures the port.
>>>>>>>>> + The application should restore some additional configuration,
>>>>>>>>> and then
>>>>>>>>> + enable data path API invocation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ``RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_FAILED``
>>>>>>>>> Notify the application that the recovery from error failed,
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.c b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.c
>>>>>>>>> index 0be1e8ca04..f994653fe9 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -515,6 +515,14 @@ rte_eth_dma_zone_free(const struct rte_eth_dev
>>>>>>>>> *dev, const char *ring_name,
>>>>>>>>> return rc;
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +void
>>>>>>>>> +rte_eth_fp_ops_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>> + if (dev == NULL)
>>>>>>>>> + return;
>>>>>>>>> + eth_dev_fp_ops_setup(rte_eth_fp_ops + dev->data->port_id, dev);
>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> const struct rte_memzone *
>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_dma_zone_reserve(const struct rte_eth_dev *dev, const char
>>>>>>>>> *ring_name,
>>>>>>>>> uint16_t queue_id, size_t size, unsigned int align,
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> index 2c9d615fb5..0d964d1f67 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> @@ -1621,6 +1621,16 @@ int
>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_dma_zone_free(const struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, const
>>>>>>>>> char *name,
>>>>>>>>> uint16_t queue_id);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>>>> + * @internal
>>>>>>>>> + * Setup eth fast-path API to ethdev values.
>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>> + * @param dev
>>>>>>>>> + * Pointer to struct rte_eth_dev.
>>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>>> +__rte_internal
>>>>>>>>> +void rte_eth_fp_ops_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> /**
>>>>>>>>> * @internal
>>>>>>>>> * Atomically set the link status for the specific device.
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>>>>>> index 049641d57c..44ee7229c1 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>>>>>> @@ -3944,25 +3944,28 @@ enum rte_eth_event_type {
>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_RX_AVAIL_THRESH,
>>>>>>>>> /** Port recovering from a hardware or firmware error.
>>>>>>>>> - * If PMD supports proactive error recovery,
>>>>>>>>> - * it should trigger this event to notify application
>>>>>>>>> - * that it detected an error and the recovery is being started.
>>>>>>>>> - * Upon receiving the event, the application should not invoke
>>>>>>>>> any control path API
>>>>>>>>> - * (such as rte_eth_dev_configure/rte_eth_dev_stop...) until
>>>>>>>>> receiving
>>>>>>>>> - * RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_SUCCESS or
>>>>>>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_FAILED event.
>>>>>>>>> - * The PMD will set the data path pointers to dummy functions,
>>>>>>>>> - * and re-set the data path pointers to non-dummy functions
>>>>>>>>> - * before reporting RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_SUCCESS event.
>>>>>>>>> - * It means that the application cannot send or receive any
>>>>>>>>> packets
>>>>>>>>> - * during this period.
>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>> + * If PMD supports proactive error recovery, it should trigger
>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> + * event to notify application that it detected an error and the
>>>>>>>>> + * recovery is about to start.
>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>> + * Upon receiving the event, the application should not invoke any
>>>>>>>>> + * control and data path API until receiving
>>>>>>>>> + * RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_SUCCESS or RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_FAILED
>>>>>>>>> + * event.
>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>> + * Once this event is reported, the PMD will set the data path
>>>>>>>>> pointers
>>>>>>>>> + * to dummy functions, and re-set the data path pointers to valid
>>>>>>>>> + * functions before reporting RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_SUCCESS
>>>>>>>>> event.
>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>> * @note Before the PMD reports the recovery result,
>>>>>>>>> * the PMD may report the RTE_ETH_EVENT_ERR_RECOVERING event
>>>>>>>>> again,
>>>>>>>>> * because a larger error may occur during the recovery.
>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_ERR_RECOVERING,
>>>>>>>>> /** Port recovers successfully from the error.
>>>>>>>>> - * The PMD already re-configured the port,
>>>>>>>>> - * and the effect is the same as a restart operation.
>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>> + * The PMD already re-configured the port:
>>>>>>>>> * a) The following operation will be retained: (alphabetically)
>>>>>>>>> * - DCB configuration
>>>>>>>>> * - FEC configuration
>>>>>>>>> @@ -3989,6 +3992,9 @@ enum rte_eth_event_type {
>>>>>>>>> * (@see RTE_ETH_DEV_CAPA_FLOW_SHARED_OBJECT_KEEP)
>>>>>>>>> * c) Any other configuration will not be stored
>>>>>>>>> * and will need to be re-configured.
>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>> + * The application should restore some additional configuration
>>>>>>>>> + * (see above case b/c), and then enable data path API invocation.
>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERY_SUCCESS,
>>>>>>>>> /** Port recovery failed.
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/version.map b/lib/ethdev/version.map
>>>>>>>>> index 357d1a88c0..c273e0bdae 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/lib/ethdev/version.map
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/version.map
>>>>>>>>> @@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ INTERNAL {
>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_devices;
>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_dma_zone_free;
>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_dma_zone_reserve;
>>>>>>>>> + rte_eth_fp_ops_setup;
>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_hairpin_queue_peer_bind;
>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_hairpin_queue_peer_unbind;
>>>>>>>>> rte_eth_hairpin_queue_peer_update;
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-07 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-01 3:06 [PATCH 0/5] " Chengwen Feng
2023-03-01 3:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] ethdev: " Chengwen Feng
2023-03-02 12:08 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-03 16:51 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-05 14:53 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-06 8:55 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-06 10:22 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-06 11:00 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-06 11:05 ` Ajit Khaparde
2023-03-06 11:13 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-07 8:25 ` fengchengwen [this message]
2023-03-07 9:52 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-07 10:11 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-07 12:07 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-07 12:26 ` fengchengwen
2023-03-07 12:39 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-09 2:05 ` Ajit Khaparde
2023-03-06 1:41 ` fengchengwen
2023-03-06 8:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-06 9:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-02 23:30 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-03-03 0:21 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-04 5:08 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-03-05 15:23 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-07 5:34 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-03-07 8:39 ` fengchengwen
2023-03-08 1:09 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-03-09 0:59 ` fengchengwen
2023-03-09 3:03 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-03-09 11:30 ` fengchengwen
2023-03-10 3:25 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-03-07 9:56 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-01 3:06 ` [PATCH 2/5] net/hns3: replace fp ops config function Chengwen Feng
2023-03-02 6:50 ` Dongdong Liu
2023-03-01 3:06 ` [PATCH 3/5] net/bnxt: fix race-condition when report error recovery Chengwen Feng
2023-03-02 12:23 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-01 3:06 ` [PATCH 4/5] net/bnxt: use fp ops setup function Chengwen Feng
2023-03-02 12:30 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-03 0:01 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-03 1:17 ` Ajit Khaparde
2023-03-03 2:02 ` fengchengwen
2023-03-03 1:38 ` fengchengwen
2023-03-05 15:57 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-06 2:47 ` Ajit Khaparde
2023-03-01 3:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] app/testpmd: add error recovery usage demo Chengwen Feng
2023-03-02 13:01 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-03 1:49 ` fengchengwen
2023-03-03 16:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-21 11:12 ` [PATCH 0/5] fix race-condition of proactive error handling mode Ferruh Yigit
2023-10-07 2:32 ` fengchengwen
2023-10-20 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " Chengwen Feng
2023-10-20 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ethdev: " Chengwen Feng
2023-11-01 3:39 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-10-20 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] net/hns3: replace fp ops config function Chengwen Feng
2023-11-01 3:40 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-11-02 10:34 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-10-20 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] net/bnxt: fix race-condition when report error recovery Chengwen Feng
2023-11-02 16:28 ` Ajit Khaparde
2023-10-20 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] net/bnxt: use fp ops setup function Chengwen Feng
2023-11-01 3:48 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-11-02 10:34 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-11-02 16:29 ` Ajit Khaparde
2023-10-20 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] app/testpmd: add error recovery usage demo Chengwen Feng
2023-11-01 4:08 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-11-06 13:01 ` fengchengwen
2023-10-20 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] app/testpmd: extract event handling to event.c Chengwen Feng
2023-11-01 4:09 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-10-20 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] doc: testpmd support event handling section Chengwen Feng
2023-11-06 9:28 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-11-06 12:39 ` fengchengwen
2023-11-08 3:02 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-11-06 1:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] fix race-condition of proactive error handling mode fengchengwen
2023-11-06 13:11 ` [PATCH v3 " Chengwen Feng
2023-11-06 13:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] ethdev: " Chengwen Feng
2023-11-06 13:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] net/hns3: replace fp ops config function Chengwen Feng
2023-11-06 13:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] net/bnxt: fix race-condition when report error recovery Chengwen Feng
2023-11-06 13:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] net/bnxt: use fp ops setup function Chengwen Feng
2023-11-06 13:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] app/testpmd: add error recovery usage demo Chengwen Feng
2023-11-06 13:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] app/testpmd: extract event handling to event.c Chengwen Feng
2023-11-06 13:11 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] doc: testpmd support event handling section Chengwen Feng
2023-11-08 3:03 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-12-05 2:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] fix race-condition of proactive error handling mode fengchengwen
2024-01-15 1:44 ` fengchengwen
2024-01-29 1:16 ` fengchengwen
2024-02-18 3:41 ` fengchengwen
2024-05-08 9:22 ` fengchengwen
2024-09-05 9:24 ` [PATCH v4 " Chengwen Feng
2024-09-05 9:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ethdev: " Chengwen Feng
2024-10-10 0:46 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-09-05 9:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] net/hns3: replace fp ops config function Chengwen Feng
2024-09-05 9:25 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] net/bnxt: fix race-condition when report error recovery Chengwen Feng
2024-09-05 9:25 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] net/bnxt: use fp ops setup function Chengwen Feng
2024-09-05 9:25 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] app/testpmd: add error recovery usage demo Chengwen Feng
2024-09-05 9:25 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] app/testpmd: extract event handling to event.c Chengwen Feng
2024-09-05 9:25 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] doc: testpmd support event handling section Chengwen Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9dc5d714-07a4-c32e-e557-efe8e7fe2d16@huawei.com \
--to=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).