DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mattias Rönnblom" <hofors@lysator.liu.se>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	emil.berg@ericsson.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, stable@dpdk.org, bugzilla@dpdk.org,
	olivier.matz@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net: fix checksum with unaligned buffer
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:28:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f543fc0-ae8a-067b-d13f-38a0503dd619@lysator.liu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87169@smartserver.smartshare.dk>

On 2022-06-23 14:51, Morten Brørup wrote:
>> From: Morten Brørup [mailto:mb@smartsharesystems.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2022 14.39
>>
>> With this patch, the checksum can be calculated on an unaligned buffer.
>> I.e. the buf parameter is no longer required to be 16 bit aligned.
>>
>> The checksum is still calculated using a 16 bit aligned pointer, so the
>> compiler can auto-vectorize the function's inner loop.
>>
>> When the buffer is unaligned, the first byte of the buffer is handled
>> separately. Furthermore, the calculated checksum of the buffer is byte
>> shifted before being added to the initial checksum, to compensate for
>> the
>> checksum having been calculated on the buffer shifted by one byte.
>>
>> v4:
>> * Add copyright notice.
>> * Include stdbool.h (Emil Berg).
>> * Use RTE_PTR_ADD (Emil Berg).
>> * Fix one more typo in commit message. Is 'unligned' even a word?
>> v3:
>> * Remove braces from single statement block.
>> * Fix typo in commit message.
>> v2:
>> * Do not assume that the buffer is part of an aligned packet buffer.
>>
>> Bugzilla ID: 1035
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/net/rte_ip.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/net/rte_ip.h b/lib/net/rte_ip.h
>> index b502481670..738d643da0 100644
>> --- a/lib/net/rte_ip.h
>> +++ b/lib/net/rte_ip.h
>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>>    *      The Regents of the University of California.
>>    * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation.
>>    * Copyright(c) 2014 6WIND S.A.
>> + * Copyright(c) 2022 SmartShare Systems.
>>    * All rights reserved.
>>    */
>>
>> @@ -15,6 +16,7 @@
>>    * IP-related defines
>>    */
>>
>> +#include <stdbool.h>
>>   #include <stdint.h>
>>
>>   #ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS
>> @@ -162,20 +164,40 @@ __rte_raw_cksum(const void *buf, size_t len,
>> uint32_t sum)
>>   {
>>   	/* extend strict-aliasing rules */
>>   	typedef uint16_t __attribute__((__may_alias__)) u16_p;
>> -	const u16_p *u16_buf = (const u16_p *)buf;
>> -	const u16_p *end = u16_buf + len / sizeof(*u16_buf);
>> +	const u16_p *u16_buf;
>> +	const u16_p *end;
>> +	uint32_t bsum = 0;
>> +	const bool unaligned = (uintptr_t)buf & 1;
>> +
>> +	/* if buffer is unaligned, keeping it byte order independent */
>> +	if (unlikely(unaligned)) {
>> +		uint16_t first = 0;
>> +		if (unlikely(len == 0))
>> +			return 0;
>> +		((unsigned char *)&first)[1] = *(const unsigned char *)buf;
>> +		bsum += first;
>> +		buf = RTE_PTR_ADD(buf, 1);
>> +		len--;
>> +	}
>>
>> +	/* aligned access for compiler auto-vectorization */

The compiler will be able to auto vectorize even unaligned accesses, 
just with different instructions. From what I can tell, there's no 
performance impact, at least not on the x86_64 systems I tried on.

I think you should remove the first special case conditional and use 
memcpy() instead of the cumbersome __may_alias__ construct to retrieve 
the data.

>> +	u16_buf = (const u16_p *)buf;
>> +	end = u16_buf + len / sizeof(*u16_buf);
>>   	for (; u16_buf != end; ++u16_buf)
>> -		sum += *u16_buf;
>> +		bsum += *u16_buf;
>>
>>   	/* if length is odd, keeping it byte order independent */
>>   	if (unlikely(len % 2)) {
>>   		uint16_t left = 0;
>>   		*(unsigned char *)&left = *(const unsigned char *)end;
>> -		sum += left;
>> +		bsum += left;
>>   	}
>>
>> -	return sum;
>> +	/* if buffer is unaligned, swap the checksum bytes */
>> +	if (unlikely(unaligned))
>> +		bsum = (bsum & 0xFF00FF00) >> 8 | (bsum & 0x00FF00FF) << 8;
>> +
>> +	return sum + bsum;
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>> --
>> 2.17.1
> 
> @Emil, thank you for thoroughly reviewing the previous versions.
> 
> If your test succeeds and you are satisfied with the patch, remember to reply with a "Tested-by" tag for patchwork.
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-27 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-15  7:16 [Bug 1035] __rte_raw_cksum() crash with misaligned pointer bugzilla
2022-06-15 14:40 ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-16  5:44   ` Emil Berg
2022-06-16  6:27     ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-16  6:32     ` Emil Berg
2022-06-16  6:44       ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-16 13:58         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-06-16 14:36           ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-17  7:32           ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-17  8:45             ` [PATCH] net: fix checksum with unaligned buffer Morten Brørup
2022-06-17  9:06               ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-17 12:17                 ` Emil Berg
2022-06-20 10:37                 ` Emil Berg
2022-06-20 10:57                   ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-21  7:16                     ` Emil Berg
2022-06-21  8:05                       ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-21  8:23                         ` Bruce Richardson
2022-06-21  9:35                           ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-22  6:26                             ` Emil Berg
2022-06-22  9:18                               ` Bruce Richardson
2022-06-22 11:26                                 ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-22 12:25                                   ` Emil Berg
2022-06-22 14:01                                     ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-22 14:03                                       ` Emil Berg
2022-06-23  5:21                                       ` Emil Berg
2022-06-23  7:01                                         ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-23 11:39                                           ` Emil Berg
2022-06-23 12:18                                             ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-22 13:44             ` [PATCH v2] " Morten Brørup
2022-06-22 13:54             ` [PATCH v3] " Morten Brørup
2022-06-23 12:39             ` [PATCH v4] " Morten Brørup
2022-06-23 12:51               ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-27  7:56                 ` Emil Berg
2022-06-27 10:54                   ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-27 12:28                 ` Mattias Rönnblom [this message]
2022-06-27 12:46                   ` Emil Berg
2022-06-27 12:50                     ` Emil Berg
2022-06-27 13:22                       ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-27 17:22                         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-06-27 20:21                           ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-28  6:28                             ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-06-30 16:28                               ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-07 15:21                                 ` Stanisław Kardach
2022-07-07 18:34                             ` [PATCH 1/2] app/test: add cksum performance test Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-07 18:34                               ` [PATCH 2/2] net: have checksum routines accept unaligned data Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-07 21:44                                 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-08 12:43                                   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-08 12:56                                     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] app/test: add cksum performance test Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-08 12:56                                       ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: have checksum routines accept unaligned data Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-08 14:44                                         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-07-11  9:53                                         ` Olivier Matz
2022-07-11 10:53                                           ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-11  9:47                                       ` [PATCH v2 1/2] app/test: add cksum performance test Olivier Matz
2022-07-11 10:42                                         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-11 11:33                                           ` Olivier Matz
2022-07-11 12:11                                             ` [PATCH v3 " Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-11 12:11                                               ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net: have checksum routines accept unaligned data Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-11 13:25                                                 ` Olivier Matz
2022-08-08  9:25                                                   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-09-20 12:09                                                   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-09-20 16:10                                                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-11 13:20                                               ` [PATCH v3 1/2] app/test: add cksum performance test Olivier Matz
2022-07-08 13:02                                     ` [PATCH 2/2] net: have checksum routines accept unaligned data Morten Brørup
2022-07-08 13:52                                       ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-08 14:10                                         ` Bruce Richardson
2022-07-08 14:30                                           ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-30 17:41               ` [PATCH v4] net: fix checksum with unaligned buffer Stephen Hemminger
2022-06-30 17:45               ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-07-01  4:11                 ` Emil Berg
2022-07-01 16:50                   ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-01 17:04                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-07-01 20:46                       ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-16 14:09       ` [Bug 1035] __rte_raw_cksum() crash with misaligned pointer Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-10 10:40 ` bugzilla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9f543fc0-ae8a-067b-d13f-38a0503dd619@lysator.liu.se \
    --to=hofors@lysator.liu.se \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=emil.berg@ericsson.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).