From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A25F976 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:17:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=intel; t=1490595437; x=1522131437; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=fthwAGy/Zkx6GrEO9gm7R+vhymemrqXBLnHCEWqZV1o=; b=gGaz1oBpuSEAYUVNC5JZ//G7fAabbRiGMnII2+lbNtXsUIqmo1A2aKc5 7GiGjx0RhPYI4GAD3OdOHr4wUG/Kvg==; Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Mar 2017 23:17:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,229,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="79630552" Received: from pgsmsx108.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.103]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2017 23:17:15 -0700 Received: from pgsmsx103.gar.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.72]) by PGSMSX108.gar.corp.intel.com ([169.254.8.13]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:17:13 +0800 From: "Zhao1, Wei" To: "Wu, Jingjing" , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/i40e: vf port reset Thread-Index: AQHSk9t2U1ktcnaVmE289OIRbvo/26GjGRsAgAVCbNA= Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:17:12 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1488516984-34702-1-git-send-email-wei.zhao1@intel.com> <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810D12F0C@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810D12F0C@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.30.20.205] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/i40e: vf port reset X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:17:17 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Wu, Jingjing > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 1:57 PM > To: Zhao1, Wei ; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/i40e: vf port reset >=20 >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wei Zhao > > Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 12:56 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/i40e: vf port reset > > > > The patches mainly finish following functions: > > 1) get pf reset vf comamand falg from interrupt server function. > > 2) reset vf port from testpmd app using a command. > > 3) sore and restore vf related parameters. > > >=20 > The patch order is wrong. You need to make sure the compile can be > Successful when apply each patch in order. So I think should like 1. ethd= ev > API 2. i40e change 3. testpmd change. >=20 Ok, I will change the order in v2 >=20 > Another comment is like: > The reset API can be used for device reset. Please don't limit the scope = it > to VF. Ok.