From: "Zhao1, Wei" <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
To: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and other events in 82574
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:29:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A2573D2ACFCADC41BB3BE09C6DE313CA07E4BF52@PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180727181317.7374-1-bluca@debian.org>
As datasheet list:
Other Interrupt. Indicates one of the following interrupts was set:
* Link Status Change.
* Receiver Overrun.
* MDIO Access Complete.
* Small Receive Packet Detected.
* Receive ACK Frame Detected.
* Manageability Event Detected.
Which is need when using DPDK?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhao1, Wei
> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 6:17 PM
> To: 'Luca Boccassi' <bluca@debian.org>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and
> other events in 82574
>
> Hi, Luca Boccassi
>
> A question for this feature, in em code, function
> eth_em_interrupt_handler() we have no process for handle other cause
> interrupt.
> So, why do we enable this OTHER cause interrupt in DPDK?
> You mean some application may take advance of this interrupt for some
> unknown purpose when using DPDK?
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Luca Boccassi
> > Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 2:13 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi
> > <bluca@debian.org>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: enable MSI-x for linkup and
> > other events in 82574
> >
> > Linux supports 82574 MSI-x interrupt for linkup and other link conditions.
> > Enable the same feature in the e1000 PMD in order to allow this card
> > to work properly, as it requires interrupt handling for link
> > negotiations among other things.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Hi Wenzhuo - just to make it clear, this patch and the previous are
> > not targeted for 18.08, just clearing my queue.
> >
> > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c | 5 +++++
> > drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 5 +++--
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > b/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > index 7c279dbb3..397dd9482 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82571.c
> > @@ -1257,6 +1257,11 @@ STATIC s32 e1000_init_hw_82571(struct
> e1000_hw
> > *hw)
> > */
> > e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_82571(hw);
> >
> > + /* MSI-X configure for 82574 */
> > + if (mac->type == e1000_82574)
> > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IVAR,
> > + (E1000_IVAR_INT_ALLOC_VALID << 16));
> > +
> > return ret_val;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c index 7039dc100..bd05e4de0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > @@ -1444,7 +1444,8 @@ eth_em_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev)
> > /* clear interrupt */
> > E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_ICR);
> > regval = E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_IMS);
> > - E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS, regval | E1000_ICR_LSC);
> > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS,
> > + regval | E1000_ICR_LSC | E1000_ICR_OTHER);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1494,7 +1495,7 @@ em_rxq_intr_enable(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> static
> > void em_lsc_intr_disable(struct e1000_hw *hw) {
> > - E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC);
> > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMC, E1000_IMS_LSC |
> > E1000_IMS_OTHER);
> > E1000_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.18.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-09 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-27 18:13 Luca Boccassi
2018-09-26 10:23 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-10-09 10:16 ` Zhao1, Wei
2018-10-09 10:32 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-10-10 7:13 ` Zhao1, Wei
2018-10-10 17:58 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-10-09 10:29 ` Zhao1, Wei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A2573D2ACFCADC41BB3BE09C6DE313CA07E4BF52@PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com \
--to=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).