From: "Zhao1, Wei" <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
To: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"Peng, Yuan" <yuan.peng@intel.com>,
"Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix offloads overwrite by default configuration
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 01:17:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A2573D2ACFCADC41BB3BE09C6DE313CA07F03B73@PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9266cfc-6623-d69a-4a61-ab31a90a5399@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 10:37 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo
> <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix offloads overwrite by
> default configuration
>
> On 5/9/2019 8:20 AM, Wei Zhao wrote:
> > There is an error in function rxtx_port_config(), which may overwrite
> > offloads configuration get from function launch_args_parse() when run
> > testpmd app. So rxtx_port_config() should do "or" for port offloads.
> >
> > Fixes: d44f8a485f5d ("app/testpmd: enable per queue configure")
> > cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> > ---
> > app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> > 6fbfd29..f0061d9 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > @@ -2809,9 +2809,12 @@ static void
> > rxtx_port_config(struct rte_port *port) {
> > uint16_t qid;
> > + uint64_t offloads;
> >
> > for (qid = 0; qid < nb_rxq; qid++) {
> > + offloads = port->rx_conf[qid].offloads;
> > port->rx_conf[qid] = port->dev_info.default_rxconf;
> > + port->rx_conf[qid].offloads |= offloads;
>
> While talking with Kevin, he pointed out the error in this code.
>
> We are updating queue level offloads, with whatever in the 'offloads' and it can
> be non-queue level offloads in it, next time ethdev API called these values are
> caught by the API checks and causing an error.
>
> It looks like port level offload flags needs to be masted out before writing to
> queue level 'offloads' variable.
By the way, this error in not introduced in this patch, it seems has exist long before this patch.
This patch is just fix for overwrite problem.
>
> >
> > /* Check if any Rx parameters have been passed */
> > if (rx_pthresh != RTE_PMD_PARAM_UNSET) @@ -2833,7
> +2836,9 @@
> > rxtx_port_config(struct rte_port *port)
> > }
> >
> > for (qid = 0; qid < nb_txq; qid++) {
> > + offloads = port->tx_conf[qid].offloads;
> > port->tx_conf[qid] = port->dev_info.default_txconf;
> > + port->tx_conf[qid].offloads |= offloads;
> >
> > /* Check if any Tx parameters have been passed */
> > if (tx_pthresh != RTE_PMD_PARAM_UNSET)
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-09 7:20 [dpdk-dev] " Wei Zhao
2019-05-09 7:20 ` Wei Zhao
2019-05-13 3:30 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-05-13 3:30 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-05-13 15:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-13 15:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-13 16:35 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-13 16:35 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-14 1:56 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-05-14 1:56 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-05-20 15:23 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-21 1:30 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-05-21 15:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-24 1:55 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-05-24 13:03 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-10 7:27 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-06-11 14:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-12 0:57 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-06-12 1:17 ` Zhao1, Wei [this message]
2019-06-14 15:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-17 1:51 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-06-17 12:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A2573D2ACFCADC41BB3BE09C6DE313CA07F03B73@PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com \
--to=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=yuan.peng@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).