From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com (mail-pa0-f49.google.com [209.85.220.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7B56AA9 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 06:59:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id hz1so1666942pad.36 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:00:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=TLYhKa5Yrdt6SGeAaHuvs8abz47woGG48yutAqfcQtk=; b=Stcum08gbyNORxRZuN+JXInMlnWsD6n5nP5VKwjSI5aCJkGs73bTtTXHoSzo3DhQfg DznO7v/BVXA3Hb9i+x/54l3ORgCLSlTksQh4i+36MkL9KeEg2JK9NJPdkkOEczkpFb81 XzmnnBdmxsnvifkIWZ8Ajp7yJGaFIdMCeSsVSyXsm1uXSwUwu4HiKM+RTl6M0jRdKwko X1aNrHGJEck9zkwJ7q3pqac00wpi7cOzK8dabTA1gFm5+vKgiOgeUge+nY7WhnyPhWxG CD8KB+2/M8XiR33pth6fLeEvMa9GNeWU6RsV4gUdxFZnu1kWZZTc7td2HidlqdkesvXE Rv5g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlU3S2Kft5v+dCz3//qHpWxd96CVmI11k+c3m16thvKxUypHB7VcQyJMtn4qIHzg5eqH5jG X-Received: by 10.68.212.10 with SMTP id ng10mr8004480pbc.95.1393653638469; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:00:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.80] (c-76-103-138-196.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [76.103.138.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id zb2sm4513638pbc.30.2014.02.28.22.00.36 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:00:37 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) From: Daniel Kan In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:00:34 -0800 Message-Id: References: To: Selvaganapathy Chidambaram X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Profiling tools for DPDK applications running on VM inside ESXi server X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 05:59:12 -0000 Thanks for the tip. Maybe it=92s better to optimize code on bare metal = before moving to VM.=20 Dan On Feb 28, 2014, at 6:12 PM, Selvaganapathy Chidambaram = wrote: > Hi Dan, >=20 > When we tried, perf did not work in ESX, it only works in KVM. = oprofile works in timer mode in ESX.=20 >=20 > Thanks, > Selvaganapathy.C. >=20 >=20 > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Kan wrote: > Hi, > I=92m wondering which profilers are best for profiling DPDK = applications running on VM: perf, oprofile, vtune? The first 2 are open = sourced while vtune is commercial. DPDK apps are running on ubuntu 12.04 = and centos 6.5. Thanks. >=20 > Dan >=20