From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66BF7EA8 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:32:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from android-fb5fc4f6ed62fb42.attlocal.net (99-34-229-174.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.34.229.174]) by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D72DF80C3D9; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:39:47 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20141014115220.5c9ba581@uryu.home.lan> References: <1413273236-1873-1-git-send-email-mhall@mhcomputing.net> <20141014094415.GB8912@BRICHA3-MOBL> <20141014115220.5c9ba581@uryu.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: Matthew Hall Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:40:20 -0700 To: Stephen Hemminger , Bruce Richardson Message-ID: Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio-net-pmd: .gitignore: ignore librte_pmd_virtio.so X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:32:53 -0000 Sure, I can put the classic C gitignore entries in there if you guys prefer. I was just trying to make the minimum change to get it to work right for my environment. -- Sent from my mobile device. On October 14, 2014 2:52:20 AM PDT, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:16 +0100 >Bruce Richardson wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:53:56AM +0000, Matthew Hall wrote: >> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Hall >> > --- >> > .gitignore | 1 + >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore >> > index e69de29..08d831a 100644 >> > --- a/.gitignore >> > +++ b/.gitignore >> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ >> > +librte_pmd_virtio.so >> > -- >> > 1.9.1 >> > >> >> I thought our .gitignore could do with a few entries added alright, I >just >> never expected this one to be top of the list! While I don't think it >does >> any harm, I'm just curious why you think it needs to be added? >> >> /Bruce > >Why not add *.so to ignore all built shared libraries