From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E945B3F9 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 04:41:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2014 19:41:00 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,598,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="639430247" Received: from pgsmsx108.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.103]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2014 19:40:59 -0800 Received: from kmsmsx154.gar.corp.intel.com (172.21.73.14) by PGSMSX108.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:40:56 +0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.153) by KMSMSX154.gar.corp.intel.com (172.21.73.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:40:56 +0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.240]) by SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.110]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:40:54 +0800 From: "Cao, Waterman" To: Neil Horman , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] xenvirt: Fix build break on cmdline_parse_etheraddr call Thread-Index: AQHQGhucjegE41eyVE21zbxG0wj3uZyUs8NA Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 03:40:54 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1418835808-18803-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <1418835808-18803-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] xenvirt: Fix build break on cmdline_parse_etheraddr call X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 03:41:02 -0000 Hi Neil, Can you let me know what configuration you used for XEN Domain U? Do you able to run some test cases on XEN Domain U? So far, we met some issues on xenvirt (Domain U).=20 Thanks Waterman=20