From: "Jayakumar Satri" <JS00123073@TechMahindra.com>
To: "Sambath Kumar Balasubramanian"
<sambath.balasubramanian@gmail.com>,
"St Leger, Jim" <jim.st.leger@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Merge with 1.4.1??
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:54:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AD44A5B3E441204283C1A3CDFE6D49CC0290F36C@SINBNGEX001.TechMahindra.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPrcauOrxU0AEe8Ua7ZYmwYDuK3Bf38TWKTqzhHTKtR15SrRVA@mail.gmail.com>
Yes.
-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sambath Kumar
Balasubramanian
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 9:38 PM
To: St Leger, Jim
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Merge with 1.4.1??
Hi All,
Just wanted to confirm that 1.4.1 is the latest stable version of DPDK
that is recommended for use?
Thanks,
Sambath
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:56 AM, St Leger, Jim
<jim.st.leger@intel.com>wrote:
> As Stephen noted, Intel has posted our latest Intel DPDK to our site.
> The main site is
>
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/intel-technol
ogy/packet-processing-is-enhanced-with-software-from-intel-dpdk.html
> You'll see the code (as referenced below for download
>
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/intel-technol
ogy/dpdk-source-code.html)
> as well as other supporting documentation.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 11:49 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Merge with 1.4.1??
>
> What are plans to merge in latest Intel 1.4.1 DPDK?
>
>
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/intel-technol
ogy/dpdk-source-code.html
>
============================================================================================================================
Disclaimer: This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the
Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may review the policy at <a href="http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html">http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html</a>
externally and <a href="http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html">http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html</a> internally within Tech Mahindra.
============================================================================================================================
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-16 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-06 6:48 Stephen Hemminger
2013-09-06 14:56 ` St Leger, Jim
2013-09-09 14:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2013-09-14 16:07 ` Sambath Kumar Balasubramanian
2013-09-16 5:24 ` Jayakumar Satri [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AD44A5B3E441204283C1A3CDFE6D49CC0290F36C@SINBNGEX001.TechMahindra.com \
--to=js00123073@techmahindra.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jim.st.leger@intel.com \
--cc=sambath.balasubramanian@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).