From: Mordechay Haimovsky <motih@mellanox.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Olga Shern <olgas@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: add support for 32bit systems
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:07:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM0PR05MB443500934717584C113D0BF3D2400@AM0PR05MB4435.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR05MB443574661B30EFDB34B67009D2400@AM0PR05MB4435.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Hello Ferruh,
Here are my findings:
1. The error you've seen is definitely a bug in mlx5dv.h from rdma-core
(I'm emphasizing rdma-core since I cannot just send a fix for this file)
As it didn’t take into account that an address may be a 32bit one when performing the 32bit shift.
__m128i val = _mm_set_epi32((uint32_t)address, (uint32_t)(address >> 32), lkey, length);
2. The reason we didn’t see it in our setups is due to the values assigned to the GCC predefined macros
We are using (from RH and UBUNTU).
When I run the following commands in our setups:
alias gccmacros='gcc -dM -E -x c /dev/null'
gccmacros -m32 | grep -E "(MMX|SSE|AVX|XOP)"
I get the following results:
On RH setup using gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-11) (GCC)
#define __MMX__ 1
#define __SSE2__ 1
#define __SSE__ 1
On Ubuntu setup using gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.10)
No flags are defined.
Since the "offending" routine is wrapped with #ifdef __SSE3__ the compiler just ignores it.
ARs:
1. Open a bug for fixing mlx5dv.h in rdma-core. - Moti H.
2. Provide a workaround for the problem. - Moti H.
3. Verify that this is actually the issue by running the above scripts
In Ferruh setup and verifying the SSE3 flag is set. - Ferruh Yigit
Moti H.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mordechay
> Haimovsky
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 1:10 PM
> To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Shahaf Shuler
> <shahafs@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: add support for 32bit systems
>
> Hi,
> Didn’t see it in our setups (not an excuse), Investigating ....
>
> Moti
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 4:49 PM
> > To: Mordechay Haimovsky <motih@mellanox.com>; Shahaf Shuler
> > <shahafs@mellanox.com>
> > Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: add support for 32bit
> > systems
> >
> > On 7/2/2018 12:11 PM, Moti Haimovsky wrote:
> > > This patch adds support for building and running mlx5 PMD on 32bit
> > > systems such as i686.
> > >
> > > The main issue to tackle was handling the 32bit access to the UAR as
> > > quoted from the mlx5 PRM:
> > > QP and CQ DoorBells require 64-bit writes. For best performance, it
> > > is recommended to execute the QP/CQ DoorBell as a single 64-bit
> > > write operation. For platforms that do not support 64 bit writes, it
> > > is possible to issue the 64 bits DoorBells through two consecutive
> > > writes, each write 32 bits, as described below:
> > > * The order of writing each of the Dwords is from lower to upper
> > > addresses.
> > > * No other DoorBell can be rung (or even start ringing) in the midst of
> > > an on-going write of a DoorBell over a given UAR page.
> > > The last rule implies that in a multi-threaded environment, the
> > > access to a UAR page (which can be accessible by all threads in the
> > > process) must be synchronized (for example, using a semaphore)
> > > unless an atomic write of 64 bits in a single bus operation is
> > > guaranteed. Such a synchronization is not required for when ringing
> > > DoorBells on different UAR pages.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Moti Haimovsky <motih@mellanox.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > > * Fixed coding style issues.
> > > * Modified documentation according to review inputs.
> > > * Fixed merge conflicts.
> > > ---
> > > doc/guides/nics/features/mlx5.ini | 1 +
> > > doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst | 6 +++-
> > > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c | 8 ++++-
> > > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h | 5 +++
> > > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_defs.h | 18 ++++++++--
> > > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c | 6 +++-
> > > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c | 22 +++++++------
> > > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h | 69
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c | 13 +++++++-
> > > 9 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/features/mlx5.ini
> > > b/doc/guides/nics/features/mlx5.ini
> > > index e75b14b..b28b43e 100644
> > > --- a/doc/guides/nics/features/mlx5.ini
> > > +++ b/doc/guides/nics/features/mlx5.ini
> > > @@ -43,5 +43,6 @@ Multiprocess aware = Y
> > > Other kdrv = Y
> > > ARMv8 = Y
> > > Power8 = Y
> > > +x86-32 = Y
> > > x86-64 = Y
> > > Usage doc = Y
> > > diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
> > > index
> > > 7dd9c1c..5fbad60 100644
> > > --- a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
> > > +++ b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
> > > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ libibverbs.
> > > Features
> > > --------
> > >
> > > -- Multi arch support: x86_64, POWER8, ARMv8.
> > > +- Multi arch support: x86_64, POWER8, ARMv8, i686.
> > > - Multiple TX and RX queues.
> > > - Support for scattered TX and RX frames.
> > > - IPv4, IPv6, TCPv4, TCPv6, UDPv4 and UDPv6 RSS on any number of
> > queues.
> > > @@ -477,6 +477,10 @@ RMDA Core with Linux Kernel
> > > - Minimal kernel version : v4.14 or the most recent 4.14-rc (see
> > > `Linux installation documentation`_)
> > > - Minimal rdma-core version: v15+ commit 0c5f5765213a ("Merge pull
> > request #227 from yishaih/tm")
> > > (see `RDMA Core installation documentation`_)
> > > +- When building for i686 use:
> > > +
> > > + - rdma-core version 18.0 or above built with 32bit support.
> >
> > related "or above" part, v19 giving build errors with mlx5, FYI.
> >
> > And with v18 getting build errors originated from rdma headers [1], am
> > I doing something wrong?
> >
> > [1]
> > In file included from .../dpdk/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_glue.c:20:
> > .../rdma-core/build32/include/infiniband/mlx5dv.h: In function
> > ‘mlx5dv_x86_set_data_seg’:
> > .../rdma-core/build32/include/infiniband/mlx5dv.h:787:69: error: right
> > shift count >= width of type [-Werror=shift-count-overflow]
> > __m128i val = _mm_set_epi32((uint32_t)address, (uint32_t)(address
> > >> 32), lkey, length);
> >
> > ^~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-05 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-28 7:12 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Moti Haimovsky
2018-07-02 7:05 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-07-02 10:39 ` Mordechay Haimovsky
2018-07-02 11:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Moti Haimovsky
2018-07-02 20:59 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-07-03 12:03 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-07-04 13:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-07-05 10:09 ` Mordechay Haimovsky
2018-07-05 11:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-07-11 12:22 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-07-05 17:07 ` Mordechay Haimovsky [this message]
2018-07-05 17:49 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-07-09 7:23 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-07-08 17:04 ` Mordechay Haimovsky
2018-07-12 12:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Moti Haimovsky
2018-07-13 6:16 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-07-18 8:08 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM0PR05MB443500934717584C113D0BF3D2400@AM0PR05MB4435.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
--to=motih@mellanox.com \
--cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=olgas@mellanox.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).