DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
To: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Dhruv Tripathi <Dhruv.Tripathi@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Jack Bond-Preston <jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com>,
	Nick Connolly <Nick.Connolly@arm.com>,
	Vinod Krishna <Vinod.Krishna@arm.com>,
	"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: add Arm WFET in power management intrinsics
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:27:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM0PR08MB5073DD17FB58524AFE5A8CF19FDD2@AM0PR08MB5073.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <859956985.pAmPZ1aGmH@thomas>

> RTE_WAIT_UNTIL_EQUAL_ARCH_DEFINED #ifdef block.
> > This patch fixes this issue by moving __RTE_ARM_WFE out of
> > RTE_WAIT_UNTIL_EQUAL_ARCH_DEFINED block.
> >
> > Perhaps we should change RTE_ARM_USE_WFE to something like
> > RTE_ARM_USE_WFE_IN_WAIT_UNTIL_EQUAL ?
> 
> Yes perhaps.
RTE_ARM_USE_WFE is already used in drivers/event/cnxk/cn10k_worker.h
therefore RTE_ARM_USE_WFE_IN_WAIT_UNTIL_EQUAL is not suitable.
I wouldn't mind keeping RTE_ARM_USE_WFE because "USE_WFE" sounds like an
instruction to use WFE rather than an indication of availability of the WFE instruction. 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-03 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-04  4:44 [PATCH 1/2] config/arm: adds Arm Neoverse N3 SoC Wathsala Vithanage
2024-06-04  4:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] eal: add Arm WFET in power management intrinsics Wathsala Vithanage
2024-06-04 15:41   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-19  6:45   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] config/arm: adds Arm Neoverse N3 SoC Wathsala Vithanage
2024-06-19  6:45     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: add Arm WFET in power management intrinsics Wathsala Vithanage
2024-06-27 15:30       ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-07-01 21:34         ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-02  8:29           ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-07-03 13:27             ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage [this message]
2024-07-03 13:33               ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-07-03 16:58                 ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-04 10:55                   ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2024-07-04 14:14                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-07-04 14:55                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-04 18:59                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-07-05 16:10                           ` [EXTERNAL] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2024-07-07 17:37                             ` [EXTERNAL] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-07-05 16:01                     ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-05 16:11                       ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2024-07-05 16:25                         ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-03 16:19             ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-15 22:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] eal: expand the availability of WFE and related instructions Wathsala Vithanage
2024-07-15 22:53   ` [PATCH v3 2/4] config/arm: adds Arm Neoverse N3 SoC Wathsala Vithanage
2024-07-16  1:52     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-07-15 22:53   ` [PATCH v3 3/4] eal: add Arm WFET in power management intrinsics Wathsala Vithanage
2024-07-15 22:53   ` [PATCH v3 4/4] eal: describe Arm CPU features including WFXT Wathsala Vithanage
2024-07-16  1:02     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-07-26 17:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] eal: expand the availability of WFE and related instructions Wathsala Vithanage
2024-07-26 17:15   ` [PATCH v4 2/4] config/arm: adds Arm Neoverse N3 SoC Wathsala Vithanage
2024-07-26 17:15   ` [PATCH v4 3/4] eal: add Arm WFET in power management intrinsics Wathsala Vithanage
2024-10-10 17:01     ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-07-26 17:15   ` [PATCH v4 4/4] eal: describe Arm CPU features including WFXT Wathsala Vithanage

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM0PR08MB5073DD17FB58524AFE5A8CF19FDD2@AM0PR08MB5073.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
    --cc=Dhruv.Tripathi@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Nick.Connolly@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=Vinod.Krishna@arm.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).