From: Oleg Kuporosov <olegk@mellanox.com>
To: "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>,
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] mbuf: embedding timestamp into the packet
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:40:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM4PR0501MB2785EE15A56BBE62012CF72CCFD20@AM4PR0501MB2785.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F010AFE30@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hello Reshma
> I just read this mail chain, to make every one aware again, I am emphasizing
> on the point that I am also adding new "time_arraived" field to mbuf struct as
> part of below 17.02 Road map item.
Thanks for your work for extending statistics support in DPDK.
"time_arrived" points here for mostly RX path, while more common term used "timestamp"
Allows also using it for TX path as well in the future.
Best regards,
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-19 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 14:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Improvements in packet timestamps support Oleg Kuporosov
2016-10-13 14:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] mbuf: embedding timestamp into the packet Oleg Kuporosov
2016-10-18 15:43 ` Olivier Matz
2016-10-19 10:14 ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-10-19 17:40 ` Oleg Kuporosov [this message]
2016-10-25 12:39 ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-10-19 13:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-10-20 8:03 ` Oleg Kuporosov
2016-10-20 10:57 ` Jan Blunck
2016-10-19 17:08 ` Oleg Kuporosov
2017-01-24 15:27 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-10-13 14:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] app/testpmd: enabled control for packet timestamps Oleg Kuporosov
2017-04-25 14:02 ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-04-25 16:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-28 0:19 ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-04-28 9:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-28 10:04 ` Olivier Matz
2016-10-13 14:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/mlx5: implementation of Rx packet timestamping support Oleg Kuporosov
2016-10-17 11:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Improvements in packet timestamps support Nélio Laranjeiro
2017-10-17 13:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM4PR0501MB2785EE15A56BBE62012CF72CCFD20@AM4PR0501MB2785.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
--to=olegk@mellanox.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).