From: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
To: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>, Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
Cc: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>,
Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/11] net/mlx5: unify validation of drop action
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:57:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM4PR05MB32652AE779EE7BCBA2A0386FD20F0@AM4PR05MB3265.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26679816cc524d1b5665fc79ba48b89b37d85dd7.1579703134.git.dekelp@mellanox.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 16:27
> To: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>; Slava Ovsiienko
> <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>; Ori Kam
> <orika@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH 05/11] net/mlx5: unify validation of drop action
>
> According to PRM: "Drop action is mutually-exclusive with any other action,
> except for Count action".
> In current code this limitaion is checked separately in validation function of
> each action.
>
> This patch removes the discrete checks, and adds a single check common for
> all actions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c | 25 +------------------------
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 36 ++++++++++++------------------------
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
> index 970123b..7738cb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
> @@ -905,11 +905,6 @@ uint32_t mlx5_flow_adjust_priority(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev, int32_t priority,
> const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
> struct rte_flow_error *error) {
> -
> - if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
> - return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> - RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> - "can't drop and flag in same flow");
> if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_MARK)
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL, @@ -961,10 +956,6 @@ uint32_t mlx5_flow_adjust_priority(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev, int32_t priority,
> &mark->id,
> "mark id must in 0 <= id < "
> RTE_STR(MLX5_FLOW_MARK_MAX));
> - if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
> - return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> - RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> - "can't drop and mark in same flow");
> if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_FLAG)
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL, @@ -996,24 +987,10 @@ uint32_t mlx5_flow_adjust_priority(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev, int32_t priority,
> * 0 on success, a negative errno value otherwise and rte_errno is set.
> */
> int
> -mlx5_flow_validate_action_drop(uint64_t action_flags,
> +mlx5_flow_validate_action_drop(uint64_t action_flags __rte_unused,
> const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
> struct rte_flow_error *error) {
> - if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_FLAG)
> - return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> - RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> - "can't drop and flag in same flow");
> - if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_MARK)
> - return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> - RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> - "can't drop and mark in same flow");
> - if (action_flags & (MLX5_FLOW_FATE_ACTIONS |
> - MLX5_FLOW_FATE_ESWITCH_ACTIONS))
> - return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> - RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> - "can't have 2 fate actions in"
> - " same flow");
> if (attr->egress)
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
>
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR_EGRESS, NULL, diff --git
> a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c index
> 59ece01..b0d5688 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> @@ -1912,10 +1912,6 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> assert(ret > 0);
> - if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
> - return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> - RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> - "can't drop and flag in same flow");
> if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_MARK)
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL, @@ -1985,10 +1981,6 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
>
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION_CONF,
> &mark->id,
> "mark id exceeds the limit");
> - if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
> - return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> - RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> - "can't drop and mark in same flow");
> if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_FLAG)
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL, @@ -2173,10 +2165,6 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> action,
> "configuration cannot be null");
> - if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
> - return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> - RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> - "can't drop and encap in same
> flow");
> if (action_flags & (MLX5_FLOW_ENCAP_ACTIONS |
> MLX5_FLOW_DECAP_ACTIONS))
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL, @@ -2209,10 +2197,6 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
> const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
> struct rte_flow_error *error)
> {
> - if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
> - return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> - RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> - "can't drop and decap in same
> flow");
> if (action_flags & (MLX5_FLOW_ENCAP_ACTIONS |
> MLX5_FLOW_DECAP_ACTIONS))
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL, @@ -2259,10 +2243,6 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> action,
> "configuration cannot be null");
> - if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
> - return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> - RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> - "can't drop and encap in same
> flow");
> if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ENCAP_ACTIONS)
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL, @@ -2306,10 +2286,6 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = { {
> const struct rte_flow_action_raw_decap *decap = action-
> >conf;
>
> - if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
> - return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> - RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> - "can't drop and decap in same
> flow");
> if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ENCAP_ACTIONS)
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL, @@ -5051,6 +5027,18 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
> "action not supported");
> }
> }
> + /*
> + * Validate the drop action mutual exclusion with other actions.
> + * Drop action is mutually-exclusive with any other action, except for
> + * Count action.
> + */
> + if ((action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP) &&
> + (action_flags & ~(MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP |
> MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_COUNT)))
> + return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> + "Drop action is mutually-exclusive "
> + "with any other action, except for "
> + "Count action");
> /* Eswitch has few restrictions on using items and actions */
> if (attr->transfer) {
> if (!mlx5_flow_ext_mreg_supported(dev) && diff --git
> a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c
> index c787c98..72fb1e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c
> @@ -1255,6 +1255,18 @@
> "action not supported");
> }
> }
> + /*
> + * Validate the drop action mutual exclusion with other actions.
> + * Drop action is mutually-exclusive with any other action, except for
> + * Count action.
> + */
> + if ((action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP) &&
> + (action_flags & ~(MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP |
> MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_COUNT)))
> + return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> NULL,
> + "Drop action is mutually-exclusive "
> + "with any other action, except for "
> + "Count action");
> if (!(action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_FATE_ACTIONS))
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> actions,
> --
> 1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-23 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-22 14:27 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/11] net/mlx5: vlan actions validation fixes Dekel Peled
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/11] net/mlx5: fix masks of encap and decap actions Dekel Peled
2020-01-23 7:56 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/11] net/mlx5: fix invalid check for VLAN actions Dekel Peled
2020-01-23 7:56 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/11] net/mlx5: fix bit mask used for push VLAN validate Dekel Peled
2020-01-23 7:56 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/11] net/mlx5: fix allow push VLAN without VID value Dekel Peled
2020-01-23 7:57 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/11] net/mlx5: unify validation of drop action Dekel Peled
2020-01-23 7:57 ` Slava Ovsiienko [this message]
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/11] net/mlx5: fix block push VLAN action on Rx Dekel Peled
2020-01-23 7:57 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/11] net/mlx5: fix block pop VLAN action on Tx Dekel Peled
2020-01-23 7:57 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/11] net/mlx5: fix pop VLAN action validation function Dekel Peled
2020-01-23 7:57 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/11] net/mlx5: fix the set VLAN VID action validation Dekel Peled
2020-01-23 7:58 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/11] net/mlx5: update description of validation funcs Dekel Peled
2020-01-23 7:58 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-22 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/11] doc: update MLX5 supported hardware offloads table Dekel Peled
2020-01-23 7:58 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-26 15:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/11] net/mlx5: vlan actions validation fixes Raslan Darawsheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM4PR05MB32652AE779EE7BCBA2A0386FD20F0@AM4PR05MB3265.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
--to=viacheslavo@mellanox.com \
--cc=dekelp@mellanox.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).