From: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
To: Bing Zhao <bingz@mellanox.com>
Cc: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>,
Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Reorganize resources of flow tables
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 06:37:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM4PR05MB3265A839C2C059E8163ADFC3D27B0@AM4PR05MB3265.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1573188297-51428-1-git-send-email-bingz@mellanox.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bing Zhao <bingz@mellanox.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 6:45
> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
> <rasland@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Reorganize resources of flow tables
>
> Number of flow tables is limited by the memory resource, and the index
> could be to as large as 2^^32 - 1. In the past, the flow tables are organized
> by arrays, and this organization has some advantages and disadvantages.
> The lookup for the table resource from a linear array is quite fast, the ID
> could be used as the index in the array. But it will cost some extra memory
> resource after system bring up and if only a small number of tables are
> created. In the meanwhile, since we could not create the array with a huge
> number, so the maximal index of the table is limited and it is unreasonable.
> If we change the array into some other tables, like some open addressing
> hash table, the static memory cost is still to huge. But the index of the table
> limitation could be get rid of. But in the meanwhile, it will introduce some
> new issue that two tables with different ID may generate the same address
> index in the table. Then it will degrade the performance of the lookup,
> creating and deleting. Moreover, sometimes it will cause a failure if the
> collisions rate are too heavy.
> Then the simple hash list is used as the first step to get rid of this limitations.
> The only static memory over head is array of the LIST HEADs. In the next
> step, we could use some extendable hash tables for this. This will of course
> introduce some performance degradation when lookup, creating and
> removing tables in the lists if there are a lot of tables created in the system.
> We need to trade off among the functionality, memory and performance.
> Some other resources are associated with each flow tables and not global,
> like flow matchers and jump table object used by driver. They could also be
> reorganized and put into the flow table resources structure. Then the lookup
> process of these resources will be speeded up significantly.
>
> Bing Zhao (3):
> net/mlx5: reorganize flow tables with hash list
> net/mlx5: reorganize jump table resources
> net/mlx5: reorganize flow matcher resources
>
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c | 16 +++
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h | 25 ++--
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.h | 24 ++--
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 307 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> -------
> 4 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-08 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-08 4:44 Bing Zhao
2019-11-08 4:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/mlx5: reorganize flow tables with hash list Bing Zhao
2019-11-08 8:15 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-11-08 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Reorganize resources of flow tables Bing Zhao
2019-11-08 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] net/mlx5: reorganize flow tables with hash list Bing Zhao
2019-11-08 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] net/mlx5: reorganize jump table resources Bing Zhao
2019-11-08 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] net/mlx5: reorganize flow matcher resources Bing Zhao
2019-11-08 15:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Reorganize resources of flow tables Raslan Darawsheh
2019-11-08 4:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/mlx5: reorganize jump table resources Bing Zhao
2019-11-08 6:38 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-11-08 4:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/mlx5: reorganize flow matcher resources Bing Zhao
2019-11-08 8:16 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-11-08 6:37 ` Slava Ovsiienko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM4PR05MB3265A839C2C059E8163ADFC3D27B0@AM4PR05MB3265.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
--to=viacheslavo@mellanox.com \
--cc=bingz@mellanox.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).