From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com>,
"Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] ring: read tail using atomic load
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:11:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM6PR08MB3672F618AABF380FDCF87B3A98EB0@AM6PR08MB3672.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580102FE2951@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Hi Jerin,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your review, inline comments from our internal
> discussions.
> > >
> > > BR. Gavin
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2018 6:49 PM
> > > > To: Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>
> > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Steve Capper
> > > > <Steve.Capper@arm.com>; Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com>;
> nd
> > > > <nd@arm.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ring: read tail using atomic load
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:17:22 +0800
> > > > > From: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
> > > > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > > > CC: gavin.hu@arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com,
> > > > > steve.capper@arm.com, Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com,
> > > > > jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, nd@arm.com,
> stable@dpdk.org
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] ring: read tail using atomic load
> > > > > X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4
> > > > >
> > > > > External Email
> > > > >
> > > > > In update_tail, read ht->tail using __atomic_load.Although the
> > > > > compiler currently seems to be doing the right thing even without
> > > > > _atomic_load, we don't want to give the compiler freedom to
> optimise
> > > > > what should be an atomic load, it should not be arbitarily moved
> > > > > around.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 39368ebfc6 ("ring: introduce C11 memory model barrier
> option")
> > > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h | 3 ++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > The read of ht->tail needs to be atomic, a non-atomic read would not
> be correct.
> >
> > That's a 32bit value load.
> > AFAIK on all CPUs that we support it is an atomic operation.
> > [Ola] But that the ordinary C load is translated to an atomic load for the
> target architecture is incidental.
> >
> > If the design requires an atomic load (which is the case here), we
> > should use an atomic load on the language level. Then we can be sure it will
> always be translated to an atomic load for the target in question or
> compilation will fail. We don't have to depend on assumptions.
>
> We all know that 32bit load/store on cpu we support - are atomic.
> If it wouldn't be the case - DPDK would be broken in dozen places.
> So what the point to pretend that "it might be not atomic" if we do know for
> sure that it is?
> I do understand that you want to use atomic_load(relaxed) here for
> consistency, and to conform with C11 mem-model and I don't see any harm in
> that.
We can continue to discuss the topic, it is a good discussion. But, as far this patch is concerned, can I consider this as us having a consensus? The file rte_ring_c11_mem.h is specifically for C11 memory model and I also do not see any harm in having code that completely conforms to C11 memory model.
> But argument that we shouldn't assume 32bit load/store ops as atomic
> sounds a bit flaky to me.
> Konstantin
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > But there are no memory ordering requirements (with
> > > regards to other loads and/or stores by this thread) so relaxed
> memory order is sufficient.
> > > Another aspect of using __atomic_load_n() is that the
> > compiler cannot "optimise" this load (e.g. combine, hoist etc), it has to be
> done as
> > > specified in the source code which is also what we need here.
> >
> > I think Jerin points that rte_pause() acts here as compiler barrier too,
> > so no need to worry that compiler would optimize out the loop.
> > [Ola] Sorry missed that. But the barrier behaviour of rte_pause()
> > is not part of C11, is it essentially a hand-made feature to support
> > the legacy multithreaded memory model (which uses explicit HW and
> compiler barriers). I'd prefer code using the C11 memory model not to
> depend on such legacy features.
> >
> >
> >
> > Konstantin
> >
> > >
> > > One point worth mentioning though is that this change is for
> > the rte_ring_c11_mem.h file, not the legacy ring. It may be worth persisting
> > > with getting the C11 code right when people are less excited about
> sending a release out?
> > >
> > > We can explain that for C11 we would prefer to do loads and stores
> as per the C11 memory model. In the case of rte_ring, the code is
> > > separated cleanly into C11 specific files anyway.
> > >
> > > I think reading ht->tail using __atomic_load_n() is the most
> appropriate way. We show that ht->tail is used for synchronization, we
> > > acknowledge that ht->tail may be written by other threads
> > without any other kind of synchronization (e.g. no lock involved) and we
> require
> > > an atomic load (any write to ht->tail must also be atomic).
> > >
> > > Using volatile and explicit compiler (or processor) memory barriers
> (fences) is the legacy pre-C11 way of accomplishing these things.
> > There's
> > > a reason why C11/C++11 moved away from the old ways.
> > > > >
> > > > > __atomic_store_n(&ht->tail, new_val, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.7.4
> > > > >
> >
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-05 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 131+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-06 1:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ring: fix c11 memory ordering issue Gavin Hu
2018-08-06 9:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-08-08 1:39 ` Gavin Hu
2018-08-07 3:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Gavin Hu
2018-08-07 5:56 ` He, Jia
2018-08-07 7:56 ` Gavin Hu
2018-08-08 3:07 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-08-08 7:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-17 7:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] app/testpmd: show errno along with flow API errors Gavin Hu
2018-09-17 7:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] net/i40e: remove invalid comment Gavin Hu
2018-09-17 8:25 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-17 7:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc: add cross compile part for sample applications Gavin Hu
2018-09-17 9:48 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-09-17 10:28 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-17 10:34 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-09-17 10:55 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-17 10:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Gavin Hu
2018-09-17 10:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Gavin Hu
2018-09-18 11:00 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-09-19 0:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Gavin Hu
2018-09-17 8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] bus/fslmc: fix undefined reference of memsegs Gavin Hu
2018-09-17 8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] ring: read tail using atomic load Gavin Hu
2018-09-20 6:41 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-09-25 9:26 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-17 8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu
2018-09-17 8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop Gavin Hu
2018-10-27 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-17 8:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] ring: read tail using atomic load Gavin Hu
2018-09-17 8:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu
2018-09-26 9:29 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-26 9:59 ` Justin He
2018-09-29 10:57 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-17 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] " Gavin Hu
2018-10-17 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop Gavin Hu
2018-10-17 6:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-27 14:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-27 15:00 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-27 15:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-27 15:34 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-27 15:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-29 2:51 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-29 2:57 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-29 10:16 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-29 10:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-29 11:10 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-11-03 20:12 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-11-05 21:51 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-06 11:03 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-10-31 3:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] rte ring c11 bug fix and optimization Gavin Hu
2018-10-31 10:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] ring library with c11 memory model " Gavin Hu
2018-10-31 16:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-01 9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu
2018-11-01 9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop Gavin Hu
2018-11-01 17:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-11-02 0:53 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-02 4:30 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-02 7:15 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-02 9:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-02 11:23 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-31 10:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu
2018-10-31 22:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-11-01 9:56 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-31 10:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop Gavin Hu
2018-10-31 3:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu
2018-10-31 3:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop Gavin Hu
2018-10-31 9:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-31 10:27 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-01 9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] ring library with c11 memory model bug fix and optimization Gavin Hu
2018-11-02 11:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Gavin Hu
2018-11-02 11:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu
2018-11-05 9:30 ` Olivier Matz
2018-11-02 11:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop Gavin Hu
2018-11-02 11:43 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-11-03 1:19 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-03 9:34 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-05 13:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-05 13:41 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-11-05 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] " Olivier Matz
2018-11-05 13:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-17 8:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] " Gavin Hu
2018-09-26 9:29 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-26 10:06 ` Justin He
2018-09-29 7:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-09-29 10:59 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-09-26 9:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] ring: read tail using atomic load Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-26 10:09 ` Justin He
2018-09-29 10:48 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-05 0:47 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-05 8:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-10-05 11:15 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-05 11:36 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-05 13:44 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-10-05 14:21 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-05 15:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2018-10-05 17:07 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-05 18:05 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-05 20:06 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-10-05 20:17 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-05 20:29 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-10-05 20:34 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-06 7:41 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-06 19:44 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-06 19:59 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-07 4:02 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-07 20:11 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-07 20:44 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 6:06 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-08 9:22 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 10:00 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-08 10:25 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 10:33 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-08 10:39 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 10:41 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-08 10:49 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-10 6:28 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-10 19:26 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-10-08 10:46 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-08 11:21 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 11:50 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-08 11:59 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 12:05 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-08 12:20 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-08 12:30 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-09 8:53 ` Olivier Matz
2018-10-09 3:16 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-10-08 14:43 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-10-08 14:46 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 15:45 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 5:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-10-08 10:01 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-27 14:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM6PR08MB3672F618AABF380FDCF87B3A98EB0@AM6PR08MB3672.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
--cc=Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).