DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
To: "jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"yipeng1.wang@intel.com" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v1] hash: optimize signature compare by using neon intrinsic
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:47:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM6PR08MB37828611F424F19435EEBDBE9E640@AM6PR08MB3782.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c27de0eb69bc17562e64f977044f59cb7169770.camel@marvell.com>

Hi Jerin,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 15:49
> To: Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>;
> yipeng1.wang@intel.com
> Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; nd
> <nd@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH v1] hash: optimize signature compare by using
> neon intrinsic
> 
> On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 15:30 +0800, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---
> > Implemented signature compare function based on neon intrinsic.
> > Hash bulk lookup had 3% - 6% performance gain after optimization.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 32
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> > b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> > index c01489ba5..5745a254f 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> > @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
> >  #include <rte_spinlock.h>
> >  #include <rte_ring.h>
> >  #include <rte_compat.h>
> > +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> > +#include <arm_neon.h>
> > +#endif
> 
> 
> The use of rte_vector.h will remove the need for #if defined...
> 

OK. Will change to rte_vect.h in next version.

> 
> >
> >  #include "rte_hash.h"
> >  #include "rte_cuckoo_hash.h"
> > @@ -407,6 +410,10 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct
> rte_hash_parameters
> > *params)
> >  	if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_SSE2))
> >  		h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SSE;
> >  	else
> > +#elif defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> > +	if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_NEON))
> > +		h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON;
> > +	else
> >  #endif
> >  		h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SCALAR;
> >
> > @@ -1578,10 +1585,15 @@ compare_signatures(uint32_t
> > *prim_hash_matches, uint32_t *sec_hash_matches,
> >  			enum rte_hash_sig_compare_function sig_cmp_fn)
> {
> >  	unsigned int i;
> > +#ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON
> > +	uint16x8_t vmat, vsig, x;
> > +	uint64x2_t x64;
> > +	int16x8_t shift = {-15, -13, -11, -9, -7, -5, -3, -1}; #endif
> 
> Is it possible move down the variable declaration? to avoid the need for
> #ifdef here
> 

Will move down the variable declaration into 'case' block.

> >
> >  	/* For match mask the first bit of every two bits indicates the
> > match */
> >  	switch (sig_cmp_fn) {
> > -#ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE2
> > +#if defined(RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE2)
> >  	case RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SSE:
> >  		/* Compare all signatures in the bucket */
> >  		*prim_hash_matches =
> _mm_movemask_epi8(_mm_cmpeq_epi16(
> > @@ -1594,6 +1606,24 @@ compare_signatures(uint32_t
> *prim_hash_matches,
> > uint32_t *sec_hash_matches,
> >  					(__m128i const *)sec_bkt-
> > >sig_current),
> >  				_mm_set1_epi16(sig)));
> >  		break;
> > +#elif defined(RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON)
> > +	case RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON:
> > +		vsig = vld1q_dup_u16((uint16_t const *)&sig);
> > +		/* Compare all signatures in the primary bucket */
> > +		vmat = vceqq_u16(vsig,
> > +			vld1q_u16((uint16_t const *)prim_bkt-
> > >sig_current));
> > +		x = vshlq_u16(vandq_u16(vmat, vdupq_n_u16(0x8000)),
> > shift);
> > +		x64 = vpaddlq_u32(vpaddlq_u16(x));
> > +		*prim_hash_matches = (uint32_t)(vgetq_lane_u64(x64, 0)
> > +
> > +			vgetq_lane_u64(x64, 1));
> > +		/* Compare all signatures in the secondary bucket */
> > +		vmat = vceqq_u16(vsig,
> > +			vld1q_u16((uint16_t const *)sec_bkt-
> > >sig_current));
> > +		x = vshlq_u16(vandq_u16(vmat, vdupq_n_u16(0x8000)),
> > shift);
> > +		x64 = vpaddlq_u32(vpaddlq_u16(x));
> > +		*sec_hash_matches = (uint32_t)(vgetq_lane_u64(x64, 0) +
> > +			vgetq_lane_u64(x64, 1));
> > +		break;
> >  #endif
> >  	default:
> >  		for (i = 0; i < RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES; i++) { diff --git
> > a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
> > b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
> > index eacdaa8d4..0548c97f0 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
> > @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ struct rte_hash_key {  enum
> > rte_hash_sig_compare_function {
> >  	RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SCALAR = 0,
> >  	RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SSE,
> > +	RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON,
> >  	RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NUM
> >  };
> >

      reply	other threads:[~2019-02-11  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-11  7:30 [dpdk-dev] " Ruifeng Wang
2019-02-11  7:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-02-11  9:47   ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM6PR08MB37828611F424F19435EEBDBE9E640@AM6PR08MB3782.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).