DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richael Zhuang <Richael.Zhuang@arm.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "lukaszx.krakowiak@intel.com" <lukaszx.krakowiak@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] test/power: fix a bug in cpufreq autotest
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 02:10:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM8PR08MB57964A81E3690E9A57963CF192749@AM8PR08MB5796.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da2370ab-4dd3-bf36-63df-44bd7396eb20@intel.com>

Hi,
Thanks for your comments.
My change  is to make  the check_power_turbo()  to continue only when rte_power_turbo_status(TEST_POWER_LCORE_ID) returns 1 which means turbo is available.

-----Original Message-----
From: Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 5:59 PM
To: Richael Zhuang <Richael.Zhuang@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org
Cc: lukaszx.krakowiak@intel.com; stable@dpdk.org; David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] test/power: fix a bug in cpufreq autotest

On 07-Apr-21 8:46 AM, Richael Zhuang wrote:
> For platforms that don't support turbo boost,rte_power_turbo_status()
> returns "-ENOTSUP" (like power_kvm_vm_turbo_status()). So don't allow
> check_power_turbo() to continue if
> rte_power_turbo_status(TEST_POWER_LCORE_ID)!=1
>
> Fixes: aeaeaf5f2d62 ("test/power: add cases for turbo feature")
> Cc: lukaszx.krakowiak@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Richael Zhuang <richael.zhuang@arm.com>
> ---
>   app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c
> b/app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c index 1f4d8bb05..cda74bd8a 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_power_cpufreq.c
> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ check_power_turbo(void)
>   {
>   int ret;
>
> -if (rte_power_turbo_status(TEST_POWER_LCORE_ID) == 0) {
> +if (rte_power_turbo_status(TEST_POWER_LCORE_ID) != 1) {
>   printf("Turbo not available on lcore %u, skipping test\n",
>   TEST_POWER_LCORE_ID);
>   return 0;
>

If what you're really checking is -ENOTSUP, maybe check for that?
Because otherwise it seems like you're making unwarranted assumptions about why the call failed...

--
Thanks,
Anatoly
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-08  2:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-06  3:04 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] " Richael Zhuang
2021-04-06  3:41 ` Richael Zhuang
2021-04-07  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Richael Zhuang
2021-04-07  7:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] test/power: fix bugs in cpufreq test Richael Zhuang
2021-04-07  7:46       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] test/power: round cpuinfo cur freq value in cpufreq autotest Richael Zhuang
2021-04-15  5:39         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] test/power: fix bugs in cpufreq test Richael Zhuang
2021-04-15  5:39           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] test/power: round cpuinfo cur freq value in cpufreq autotest Richael Zhuang
2021-04-15  5:39           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/power: add delay before checking cpuinfo cur freq Richael Zhuang
2021-04-15  5:59         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] test/power: fix bugs in cpufreq test Richael Zhuang
2021-04-15  5:59           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] test/power: add delay before checking cpuinfo cur freq Richael Zhuang
2021-04-20 12:38             ` David Hunt
2021-04-20 13:15               ` David Hunt
2021-04-21  2:41               ` Richael Zhuang
2021-04-15  5:59           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] test/power: round cpuinfo cur freq value in cpufreq autotest Richael Zhuang
2021-04-20 14:01             ` David Hunt
2021-04-19 16:31           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] test/power: fix bugs in cpufreq test Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-21 17:22           ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-07  7:46       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] test/power: fix a bug in cpufreq autotest Richael Zhuang
2021-04-07  9:58         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-04-08  2:10           ` Richael Zhuang [this message]
2021-04-08 14:55             ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-04-12  2:08               ` Richael Zhuang
2021-04-14  8:29               ` Richael Zhuang
2021-04-07  7:46       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] test/power: add delay before checking cpuinfo cur freq Richael Zhuang
2021-04-07 10:14         ` Liang Ma
2021-04-08  5:10           ` Richael Zhuang
2021-04-08  5:16           ` Richael Zhuang
2021-04-08  7:54             ` Liang Ma
2021-04-08  9:08               ` Richael Zhuang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM8PR08MB57964A81E3690E9A57963CF192749@AM8PR08MB5796.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=richael.zhuang@arm.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=lukaszx.krakowiak@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).