From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907EB568A for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:31:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2016 06:31:08 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,426,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="900089302" Received: from irsmsx151.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.59]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2016 06:31:07 -0800 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.30]) by IRSMSX151.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.108]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:28:28 +0000 From: "Mcnamara, John" To: Thomas Monjalon , "Richardson, Bruce" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] version: adjust printing for new version scheme Thread-Index: AQHRO/NSf7EdVYs6SEexKMzenilA6p7hBVIAgESe/FA= Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:28:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1450704384-9986-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <1450704384-9986-3-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <7956038.7RoB3127Jy@xps13> In-Reply-To: <7956038.7RoB3127Jy@xps13> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZDUzMGFmZWItYzBhNC00NzZlLTgxMzItYzdkNmJiYTg0Yzc1IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IkFVTzlXODZqOU1nUFMyOEpoSFN1SnBIVkZHUWJlOWs0aE1jeVlvMEE1bzQ9In0= x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] version: adjust printing for new version scheme X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:31:25 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 10:25 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] version: adjust printing for new > version scheme >=20 > 2015-12-21 13:26, Bruce Richardson: > > Since we are now using a year-month numbering scheme, adjust the > > printing of the version to always use 2-digits for YY.MM format. Hi, In the interest of getting the version patch in and the release notes renam= ed I'm going to drop this part of the patchset and resubmit 1/3 and 3/3. If we= =20 want to rework the version output we can do it in a separate patch. I am going to maintain the zero padding of the month so that it appear as 1= 6.04 and not 16.4 in "make showversion" and rte_version(). > Shouldn't we take the opportunity to update RTE_VER_PREFIX from "RTE" to > "DPDK"? I'm also going to make this change "en passant" since it makes sense and is in the same file. The version outputs now look like this: $ make showversion 16.04.0-rc0 RTE>> version_autotest Version string: 'DPDK 16.04.0-rc0' Note, if the s/RTE/DPDK/ change breaks anyone's parsing of output for tests or otherwise, let me know. John. --=20