From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958935958 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:13:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2016 08:13:26 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,498,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="924576795" Received: from irsmsx153.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.75]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2016 08:13:25 -0800 Received: from irsmsx155.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.3) by IRSMSX153.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:13:24 +0000 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.239]) by irsmsx155.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.14.201]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:13:23 +0000 From: "Mcnamara, John" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=E9lio_Laranjeiro?= Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] cmdline: increase command line buffer Thread-Index: AQHRTSb7Uq13RbLeUUenIAa5QXaqVp731BuAgARzh4CAAARXgIAFFZSAgD1VlICAAA9cYA== Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:13:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1452090774-10650-1-git-send-email-nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> <1452595749-11297-1-git-send-email-nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> <1452595749-11297-2-git-send-email-nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> <5694F58F.1040105@redhat.com> <20160115084439.GW13678@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com> <5698B51B.60603@redhat.com> <569CF8F3.2020908@6wind.com> <20160226151651.GE2105@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com> In-Reply-To: <20160226151651.GE2105@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMDg4YzBmMmItNjQxZS00Njg3LWEzNDktODg3N2M5ZWNiM2UwIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6InNnMDQ5Ulg3R2N5cmtBcHdaT01ZYjdLcE9WVmZTUDNJMU9aUlNncWxwTzg9In0= x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] cmdline: increase command line buffer X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:13:28 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: N=E9lio Laranjeiro [mailto:nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com] > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:17 PM > To: Mcnamara, John > Cc: Olivier MATZ ; Panu Matilainen > ; dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin = ; > thomas.monjalon@6wind.com; Lu, Wenzhuo ; > olgas@mellanox.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] cmdline: increase command line > buffer >=20 >=20 > What is your position about this patch? > Is it still needed? Yes. It is still required. Acked-by: John McNamara