* [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
@ 2019-01-25 9:24 Mcnamara, John
2019-01-25 13:42 ` Jay Rolette
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mcnamara, John @ 2019-01-25 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Cc: Mcnamara, John, Thomas Monjalon, Jerin Jacob, Akhil Goyal,
Dumitrescu, Cristian, Xu, Qian Q, Yongseok Koh, Maxime Coquelin,
Zhang, Qi Z, Shahaf Shuler, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, O'Hare,
Cathal, Yigit, Ferruh
Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
28 June 2018
09:32
Agenda
------
* Subtrees
* Bugzilla
* Dates
Subtrees
--------
* Next-Net
* There are no critical/blocking issues. There is only a bunch of
patches merged, again nothing critical. Pulled from sub-trees.
It can be ready for Friday for rc4.
* Next-Crypto
* No patches
* Next-virtio
* Have prepared branch with 4 patches.
* Next-Eventdev
* No patches
* Next-Ip-pipeline
* No patches
* Master
* Documentation patches
RC4 target for Friday 25 January.
RC3 Testing
-----------
* No critical or very big issues for RC3 - from Intel Testing
LTS Testing
-----------
* Intel cannot test the LTS until after Chinese Spring Festival
* Should be able to start retesting in the week of Feb 18th
* Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
Deprecation notices
-------------------
Please review the deprecation notices below:
* doc: add deprecation notice for meson: http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/49877/
* doc: add deprecation notice to remove rte meter color: http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/48712/
* doc: update API deprecation for device reset: http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/44990/
* doc: announce change of rte service API parameter type: http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/49987/
* doc: announce ring API change: http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/49961/
OVS 2.11 Status
---------------
* 2.11 branched from master January 18th.
* 4 week stabilization period.
* Release targeted February 18th~.
DPDK 19.05
----------
* Request for to try get some changes in early
* Agreement to accept proposed dates for 19.05
* Intel to submit patch to website to update dates
* Proposal Deadline: Friday 1 March 2019
* Merge deadline: Friday 22 March 2019
* RC1 release: Friday 29 March 2019
* Release: Friday 10 May 2019
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
2019-01-25 9:24 [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018 Mcnamara, John
@ 2019-01-25 13:42 ` Jay Rolette
2019-01-25 16:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-25 21:16 ` Aaron Conole
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jay Rolette @ 2019-01-25 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mcnamara, John
Cc: dev, Thomas Monjalon, Jerin Jacob, Akhil Goyal, Dumitrescu,
Cristian, Xu, Qian Q, Yongseok Koh, Maxime Coquelin, Zhang, Qi Z,
Shahaf Shuler, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, O'Hare, Cathal, Yigit,
Ferruh
> * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
> Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
> testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
We do @ infinite io.
Jay
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:24 AM Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
wrote:
> Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
>
> 28 June 2018
> 09:32
>
> Agenda
> ------
>
> * Subtrees
> * Bugzilla
> * Dates
>
> Subtrees
> --------
>
> * Next-Net
> * There are no critical/blocking issues. There is only a bunch of
> patches merged, again nothing critical. Pulled from sub-trees.
> It can be ready for Friday for rc4.
> * Next-Crypto
> * No patches
> * Next-virtio
> * Have prepared branch with 4 patches.
> * Next-Eventdev
> * No patches
> * Next-Ip-pipeline
> * No patches
> * Master
> * Documentation patches
>
> RC4 target for Friday 25 January.
>
>
> RC3 Testing
> -----------
>
> * No critical or very big issues for RC3 - from Intel Testing
>
>
> LTS Testing
> -----------
>
> * Intel cannot test the LTS until after Chinese Spring Festival
> * Should be able to start retesting in the week of Feb 18th
> * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
> Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
> testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
>
>
> Deprecation notices
> -------------------
>
> Please review the deprecation notices below:
> * doc: add deprecation notice for meson:
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/49877/
> * doc: add deprecation notice to remove rte meter color:
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/48712/
> * doc: update API deprecation for device reset:
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/44990/
> * doc: announce change of rte service API parameter type:
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/49987/
> * doc: announce ring API change:
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/49961/
>
>
> OVS 2.11 Status
> ---------------
>
> * 2.11 branched from master January 18th.
> * 4 week stabilization period.
> * Release targeted February 18th~.
>
> DPDK 19.05
> ----------
> * Request for to try get some changes in early
> * Agreement to accept proposed dates for 19.05
> * Intel to submit patch to website to update dates
> * Proposal Deadline: Friday 1 March 2019
> * Merge deadline: Friday 22 March 2019
> * RC1 release: Friday 29 March 2019
> * Release: Friday 10 May 2019
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
2019-01-25 13:42 ` Jay Rolette
@ 2019-01-25 16:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-25 16:53 ` Jay Rolette
2019-01-25 21:16 ` Aaron Conole
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-01-25 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jay Rolette
Cc: Mcnamara, John, dev, Jerin Jacob, Akhil Goyal, Dumitrescu,
Cristian, Xu, Qian Q, Yongseok Koh, Maxime Coquelin, Zhang, Qi Z,
Shahaf Shuler, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, O'Hare, Cathal, Yigit,
Ferruh
Hi Jay,
25/01/2019 14:42, Jay Rolette:
> > * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
> > Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
> > testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
>
> We do @ infinite io.
Would you be OK to share your test plan and the results please?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
2019-01-25 16:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2019-01-25 16:53 ` Jay Rolette
2019-01-25 17:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jay Rolette @ 2019-01-25 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: Mcnamara, John, dev, Jerin Jacob, Akhil Goyal, Dumitrescu,
Cristian, Xu, Qian Q, Yongseok Koh, Maxime Coquelin, Zhang, Qi Z,
Shahaf Shuler, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, O'Hare, Cathal, Yigit,
Ferruh
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:40 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> 25/01/2019 14:42, Jay Rolette:
> > > * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
> > > Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
> > > testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
> >
> > We do @ infinite io.
>
> Would you be OK to share your test plan and the results please?
>
I thought Intel was asking if anyone was using the LTS tree (ie., is it
worthwhile to continue maintaining and testing it). We don't test DPDK as a
standalone entity. We have test plans and such for our product, which
includes DPDK, but nothing that would be of interest elsewhere.
Sorry if I misunderstood the original question.
Jay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
2019-01-25 16:53 ` Jay Rolette
@ 2019-01-25 17:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-01-25 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jay Rolette
Cc: Mcnamara, John, dev, Jerin Jacob, Akhil Goyal, Dumitrescu,
Cristian, Xu, Qian Q, Yongseok Koh, Maxime Coquelin, Zhang, Qi Z,
Shahaf Shuler, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, O'Hare, Cathal, Yigit,
Ferruh
25/01/2019 17:53, Jay Rolette:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:40 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jay,
> >
> > 25/01/2019 14:42, Jay Rolette:
> > > > * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
> > > > Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
> > > > testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
> > >
> > > We do @ infinite io.
> >
> > Would you be OK to share your test plan and the results please?
>
> I thought Intel was asking if anyone was using the LTS tree (ie., is it
> worthwhile to continue maintaining and testing it). We don't test DPDK as a
> standalone entity. We have test plans and such for our product, which
> includes DPDK, but nothing that would be of interest elsewhere.
OK
> Sorry if I misunderstood the original question.
No, I misunderstood your reply :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
2019-01-25 13:42 ` Jay Rolette
2019-01-25 16:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2019-01-25 21:16 ` Aaron Conole
2019-01-25 23:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-02-01 16:57 ` Mcnamara, John
1 sibling, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Conole @ 2019-01-25 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jay Rolette
Cc: Mcnamara, John, dev, Thomas Monjalon, Jerin Jacob, Akhil Goyal,
Dumitrescu, Cristian, Xu, Qian Q, Yongseok Koh, Maxime Coquelin,
Zhang, Qi Z, Shahaf Shuler, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, O'Hare,
Cathal, Yigit, Ferruh, Kevin Traynor, Timothy Redaelli
Jay Rolette <rolette@infinite.io> writes:
>> * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
>> Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
>> testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
>
> We do @ infinite io.
+1. Red Hat also uses the LTS releases.
I'm curious why there are three?
Isn't 16.11 deprecated now that 18.11 is released? Maybe I
misunderstand that part.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
2019-01-25 21:16 ` Aaron Conole
@ 2019-01-25 23:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-26 1:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-02-01 16:57 ` Mcnamara, John
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2019-01-25 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aaron Conole, Jay Rolette
Cc: Mcnamara, John, dev, Thomas Monjalon, Jerin Jacob, Akhil Goyal,
Dumitrescu, Cristian, Xu, Qian Q, Yongseok Koh, Maxime Coquelin,
Zhang, Qi Z, Shahaf Shuler, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, O'Hare,
Cathal, Kevin Traynor, Timothy Redaelli
On 1/25/2019 9:16 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Jay Rolette <rolette@infinite.io> writes:
>
>>> * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
>>> Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
>>> testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
>>
>> We do @ infinite io.
>
> +1. Red Hat also uses the LTS releases.
I assume the question is around stable tree, not LTS.
We have LTS trees: 16.11, 17.11, 18.11
And a stable tree valid for one release, latest stable tree will be: 18.08.x
In the existence of the LTS, do we need to keep stable tree?
>
> I'm curious why there are three?
> Isn't 16.11 deprecated now that 18.11 is released? Maybe I
> misunderstand that part.
16.11 will have latest release and later EOL. For one release there are three
LTS, other times two.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
2019-01-25 23:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2019-01-26 1:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-28 14:27 ` Aaron Conole
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-01-26 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit, Aaron Conole
Cc: Jay Rolette, Mcnamara, John, dev, Jerin Jacob, Akhil Goyal,
Dumitrescu, Cristian, Xu, Qian Q, Yongseok Koh, Maxime Coquelin,
Zhang, Qi Z, Shahaf Shuler, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, O'Hare,
Cathal, Kevin Traynor, Timothy Redaelli
26/01/2019 00:37, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 1/25/2019 9:16 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> > Jay Rolette <rolette@infinite.io> writes:
> >
> >>> * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
> >>> Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
> >>> testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
> >>
> >> We do @ infinite io.
> >
> > +1. Red Hat also uses the LTS releases.
>
> I assume the question is around stable tree, not LTS.
> We have LTS trees: 16.11, 17.11, 18.11
> And a stable tree valid for one release, latest stable tree will be: 18.08.x
>
> In the existence of the LTS, do we need to keep stable tree?
Not sure to understand this question.
Yes we need 18.08.1 which is supposed to be more stable than 18.11.0.
> > I'm curious why there are three?
> > Isn't 16.11 deprecated now that 18.11 is released? Maybe I
> > misunderstand that part.
>
> 16.11 will have latest release and later EOL. For one release there are three
> LTS, other times two.
16.11.9 was supposed to be tested and released before 18.11.1.
The plan was to have only 2 LTS at a time.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
2019-01-26 1:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2019-01-28 14:27 ` Aaron Conole
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Conole @ 2019-01-28 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: Ferruh Yigit, Jay Rolette, Mcnamara, John, dev, Jerin Jacob,
Akhil Goyal, Dumitrescu, Cristian, Xu, Qian Q, Yongseok Koh,
Maxime Coquelin, Zhang, Qi Z, Shahaf Shuler, De Lara Guarch,
Pablo, O'Hare, Cathal, Kevin Traynor, Timothy Redaelli
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> writes:
> 26/01/2019 00:37, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 1/25/2019 9:16 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> > Jay Rolette <rolette@infinite.io> writes:
>> >
>> >>> * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
>> >>> Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
>> >>> testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
>> >>
>> >> We do @ infinite io.
>> >
>> > +1. Red Hat also uses the LTS releases.
>>
>> I assume the question is around stable tree, not LTS.
>> We have LTS trees: 16.11, 17.11, 18.11
>> And a stable tree valid for one release, latest stable tree will be: 18.08.x
>>
>> In the existence of the LTS, do we need to keep stable tree?
I misunderstood the question I guess. I saw 'stable/LTS' and assumed it
was lumping them together, sorry.
Red Hat uses the LTS trees. We don't use the 'stable' tree (ie: Red Hat
won't use 19.08.1). Kevin can correct me if i got something wrong here.
> Not sure to understand this question.
> Yes we need 18.08.1 which is supposed to be more stable than 18.11.0.
>
>> > I'm curious why there are three?
>> > Isn't 16.11 deprecated now that 18.11 is released? Maybe I
>> > misunderstand that part.
>>
>> 16.11 will have latest release and later EOL. For one release there are three
>> LTS, other times two.
>
> 16.11.9 was supposed to be tested and released before 18.11.1.
> The plan was to have only 2 LTS at a time.
I was under the impression that the instant (X+2).11 releases, X.11 is
EOL. I guess that's for someone else to explain (maybe a candidate for
something in doc/guides/.../release_cadence.rst to help clarify)?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
2019-01-25 21:16 ` Aaron Conole
2019-01-25 23:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2019-02-01 16:57 ` Mcnamara, John
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mcnamara, John @ 2019-02-01 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aaron Conole, Jay Rolette
Cc: dev, Thomas Monjalon, Jerin Jacob, Akhil Goyal, Dumitrescu,
Cristian, Xu, Qian Q, Yongseok Koh, Maxime Coquelin, Zhang, Qi Z,
Shahaf Shuler, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, O'Hare, Cathal, Yigit,
Ferruh, Kevin Traynor, Timothy Redaelli
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole [mailto:aconole@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 9:16 PM
> To: Jay Rolette <rolette@infinite.io>
> Cc: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas
> Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Jerin Jacob
> <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>; Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>;
> Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q
> <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>; Maxime Coquelin
> <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Shahaf
> Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; O'Hare, Cathal
> <cathal.ohare@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Kevin
> Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Timothy Redaelli <tredaelli@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
>
> Jay Rolette <rolette@infinite.io> writes:
>
> >> * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
> >> Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
> >> testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
> >
> > We do @ infinite io.
>
> +1. Red Hat also uses the LTS releases.
Hi,
I should have been clearer on this. I meant the non-LTS "stable" release (the one we maintain for one release cycle). Historically it was meant for CVEs and hot-fixes on the head release. The question related to that stable release and whether people use it.
As suggested on the maintainers call the other day I'll probably put together a survey to find out.
The utility of the LTS releases isn't in question. :-)
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-02-01 16:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-25 9:24 [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018 Mcnamara, John
2019-01-25 13:42 ` Jay Rolette
2019-01-25 16:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-25 16:53 ` Jay Rolette
2019-01-25 17:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-25 21:16 ` Aaron Conole
2019-01-25 23:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-26 1:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-28 14:27 ` Aaron Conole
2019-02-01 16:57 ` Mcnamara, John
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).