From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCE01B4EF for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 17:59:03 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2019 08:59:01 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,549,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="143431496" Received: from irsmsx153.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.75]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2019 08:58:58 -0800 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.60]) by IRSMSX153.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.115]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 16:57:50 +0000 From: "Mcnamara, John" To: Aaron Conole , Jay Rolette CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , Thomas Monjalon , Jerin Jacob , Akhil Goyal , "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , "Xu, Qian Q" , "Yongseok Koh" , Maxime Coquelin , "Zhang, Qi Z" , Shahaf Shuler , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , "O'Hare, Cathal" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "Kevin Traynor" , Timothy Redaelli Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018 Thread-Index: AQHUtPM5rVOdP1+RTwC1IoocYx22YKXLM47Q Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 16:57:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiODc5ZTZhYTAtODgzMi00NGM1LWFlOTEtMGZjZTIxNTkyOTEzIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiZU5DZWh6c0hSODB0UlBuUFJLb0xONzlPSW56NVpiaVhCR0FcL2VTS3BZM0xTNHRqZDViWjkyV0Y4N0V5VmY0SWIifQ== dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 16:59:03 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Conole [mailto:aconole@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 9:16 PM > To: Jay Rolette > Cc: Mcnamara, John ; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas > Monjalon ; Jerin Jacob > ; Akhil Goyal ; > Dumitrescu, Cristian ; Xu, Qian Q > ; Yongseok Koh ; Maxime Coquelin > ; Zhang, Qi Z ; Shahaf > Shuler ; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > ; O'Hare, Cathal > ; Yigit, Ferruh ; Kevin > Traynor ; Timothy Redaelli > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018 >=20 > Jay Rolette writes: >=20 > >> * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree. > >> Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of > >> testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested. > > > > We do @ infinite io. >=20 > +1. Red Hat also uses the LTS releases. Hi, I should have been clearer on this. I meant the non-LTS "stable" release (t= he one we maintain for one release cycle). Historically it was meant for CV= Es and hot-fixes on the head release. The question related to that stable r= elease and whether people use it.=20 As suggested on the maintainers call the other day I'll probably put togeth= er a survey to find out. The utility of the LTS releases isn't in question. :-) John