DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>,
	"Kavanagh, Mark B" <mark.b.kavanagh@intel.com>,
	"Qiu, Michael" <michael.qiu@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_memcpy.h: additional cflags required with OVS
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:06:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2ECD28E@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F60F360A2500CD45ACDB1D700268892D0E79FD30@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Zhihong
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:38 AM
> To: Kavanagh, Mark B; Mcnamara, John; Qiu, Michael; dev@dpdk.org; Panu
> Matilainen
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] rte_memcpy.h: additional cflags required with OVS
> 
> 
> Add the "-mssse3" flag should be able to solve the 'implicit definition of
> function' error.
> BTW, current dpdk should compile with gcc 4.7.2, anything changed there
> that makes this flag mandatory?

H John,

DPDK does compile with gcc 4.7.2. The issue here is compiling OVS against DPDK HEAD. Passing -msse N to the OVS configure does fix the issue. 

John

      reply	other threads:[~2015-03-11  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-09 16:44 Kavanagh, Mark B
2015-03-09 17:51 ` Mcnamara, John
2015-03-10  0:57   ` Mcnamara, John
2015-03-10  3:00     ` Qiu, Michael
2015-03-10  9:16     ` Kavanagh, Mark B
2015-03-10  3:04 ` Qiu, Michael
2015-03-10  7:52   ` Panu Matilainen
2015-03-10  8:27   ` Mcnamara, John
2015-03-10 10:03     ` Kavanagh, Mark B
2015-03-11  4:37       ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-03-11  8:06         ` Mcnamara, John [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2ECD28E@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mark.b.kavanagh@intel.com \
    --cc=michael.qiu@intel.com \
    --cc=pmatilai@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).