From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98B79A97 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:06:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2015 01:06:13 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,380,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="465597999" Received: from irsmsx154.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.96]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2015 00:59:26 -0700 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.247]) by IRSMSX154.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.237]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:06:11 +0000 From: "Mcnamara, John" To: "Wang, Zhihong" , "Kavanagh, Mark B" , "Qiu, Michael" , "dev@dpdk.org" , Panu Matilainen Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] rte_memcpy.h: additional cflags required with OVS Thread-Index: AdBah3Gj040QJ0mYRHia+o7JqLV4XgAhDHWQAAHuIjAAJ/PdEAAHkI1w Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:06:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E60286CFDC65@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_memcpy.h: additional cflags required with OVS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:06:14 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Wang, Zhihong > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:38 AM > To: Kavanagh, Mark B; Mcnamara, John; Qiu, Michael; dev@dpdk.org; Panu > Matilainen > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] rte_memcpy.h: additional cflags required with OVS >=20 >=20 > Add the "-mssse3" flag should be able to solve the 'implicit definition o= f > function' error. > BTW, current dpdk should compile with gcc 4.7.2, anything changed there > that makes this flag mandatory? H John, DPDK does compile with gcc 4.7.2. The issue here is compiling OVS against D= PDK HEAD. Passing -msse N to the OVS configure does fix the issue.=20 John