From: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] use simple zero initializers
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:31:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2F0761A@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5787146.HQ8pXXMOKN@xps13>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 1:55 PM
> To: Olivier MATZ
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] use simple zero initializers
> > I'm wondering if adding more {0} would compile on clang, at least with
> > the current clang flags.
>
> It's fixed by adding -Wno-missing-field-initializers to clang flags.
>
> Someone to test with ICC?
>
> Thanks
Hi,
I applied patches 4318 and 4319 to the current head and they compile with icc 13.1.1.
I also see the same compilation issues as Oliver with clang 3.3.
I'm not clear on the first statement, are you going to add the -Wno-missing-field-initializers flag for clang?
John
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-16 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-14 9:31 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix build with gcc 4.4 Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-14 12:48 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-14 13:06 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-04-14 13:38 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-14 14:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-14 14:30 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-14 14:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-14 15:17 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-14 14:59 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-14 15:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-14 15:21 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-14 15:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-14 15:32 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-15 20:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] " Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-15 20:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] use simple zero initializers Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-16 10:12 ` Olivier MATZ
2015-04-16 12:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-16 16:31 ` Mcnamara, John [this message]
2015-04-16 7:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ixgbe: fix build with gcc 4.4 Zhang, Helin
2015-04-16 9:14 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-16 9:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-16 9:35 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-16 22:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] mk: fix build with gcc 4.4 and clang Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-16 22:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] use simple zero initializers Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-17 11:17 ` Mcnamara, John
2015-04-19 8:22 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-20 12:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-17 11:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] mk: fix build with gcc 4.4 and clang Mcnamara, John
2015-04-19 8:21 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-20 12:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-14 12:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix build with gcc 4.4 Vlad Zolotarov
2015-04-14 13:23 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-04-14 13:41 ` Vlad Zolotarov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2F0761A@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).