From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70FB7F1C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:31:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Apr 2015 09:31:55 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,589,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="481826551"
Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.153])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Apr 2015 09:31:53 -0700
Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.129]) by
 IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.136]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002;
 Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:31:53 +0100
From: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, Olivier MATZ
 <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] use simple zero initializers
Thread-Index: AQHQd73Uk0ls8MYa3kyyShOMX18ZAp1PW2yAgAAtj4CAAEtPoA==
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:31:52 +0000
Message-ID: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2F0761A@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1958525.YbKd0lDtje@xps13>
 <1429130956-17828-2-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <552F8B09.9070000@6wind.com> <5787146.HQ8pXXMOKN@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <5787146.HQ8pXXMOKN@xps13>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] use simple zero initializers
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:31:56 -0000



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 1:55 PM
> To: Olivier MATZ
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] use simple zero initializers


> > I'm wondering if adding more {0} would compile on clang, at least with
> > the current clang flags.
>=20
> It's fixed by adding -Wno-missing-field-initializers to clang flags.
>=20
> Someone to test with ICC?
>=20
> Thanks


Hi,

I applied patches 4318 and 4319 to the current head and they compile with i=
cc 13.1.1.

I also see the same compilation issues as Oliver with clang 3.3.

I'm not clear on the first statement, are you going to add the -Wno-missing=
-field-initializers flag for clang?

John
--=20