From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AF5C876 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 18:33:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2015 09:33:38 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,644,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="730755817" Received: from irsmsx153.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.75]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2015 09:33:38 -0700 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.216]) by IRSMSX153.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.140]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:33:37 +0100 From: "Mcnamara, John" To: Vladimir Medvedkin , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] Add toeplitz hash algorithm used by RSS Thread-Index: AQHQqqBxItVHklYe4kSd/lyotG4/hZ2z69uAgAAZlsA= Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:33:37 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1431097092-19790-1-git-send-email-medvedkinv@gmail.com> <1434725752-22847-1-git-send-email-medvedkinv@gmail.com> <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B03455A83A@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B03455A83A@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] Add toeplitz hash algorithm used by RSS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:33:40 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Richardson, Bruce > Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:00 PM > To: Vladimir Medvedkin; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] Add toeplitz hash algorithm used by RS= S >=20 > Missing signoff line. >=20 Hi, It would also be worth running Linux checkpatch against the patch, which wo= uld have caught the missing signoff. It also shows a lot of warnings in the= patch which indicates conflicts with the coding guidelines. John=20