From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849FD11C5 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 15:28:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2015 06:28:13 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,393,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="754792054" Received: from irsmsx106.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.31]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2015 06:28:13 -0700 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.216]) by IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.8.121]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:28:12 +0100 From: "Mcnamara, John" To: Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix minor sphinx build warning Thread-Index: AQHQtL2LXXSj/xsUx0qHArMgR6L5G53ICCgAgAAjiEA= Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:28:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1435837927-23681-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> <21118756.SYLE8bMqyT@xps13> In-Reply-To: <21118756.SYLE8bMqyT@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix minor sphinx build warning X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 13:28:15 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 1:18 PM > To: Mcnamara, John > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix minor sphinx build warning >=20 > But it could be useful in case new versioning chapters are added before > ABI guidelines. > In this case, the link referenced in the commit above should be updated. Hi Thomas, I'll just resubmit without the label part of the patch and submit a patch f= or the label at a later stage, if required. John