From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA67A2BAA for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:35:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2016 19:35:02 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,314,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="63270272" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2016 19:35:02 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.69) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 19:35:01 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.136]) by SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.24]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:34:59 +0800 From: "Wang, Xiao W" To: "Liu, Yong" , "Chen, Jing D" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] fm10k: enable FTAG based forwarding Thread-Index: AQHRdHVtaO/0l4hB20a08n8rSnLdKJ9OsWkAgANgg0A= Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 03:34:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1456810601-7419-2-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com> <1456917554-30257-1-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com> <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E145048CA@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E145048CA@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] fm10k: enable FTAG based forwarding X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 03:35:03 -0000 Hi, We reached a consensus on configuring FTAG by devargs method, any other sug= gestion or concern for this patch? Best Regards, Xiao > -----Original Message----- > From: Liu, Yong > Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 3:58 PM > To: Wang, Xiao W ; Chen, Jing D > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] fm10k: enable FTAG based forwardin= g >=20 > Tested-by: Yong Liu >=20 > - Tested Branch: dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04 > - Tested Commit: 4ac366ba647909c3b71818f9be9db86ba5e871da > - OS: Fedora20 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64 > - GCC: gcc version 4.8.3 20140911 > - CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz > - NIC: Intel Corporation Device RedrockCanyou [8086:15a4] > - Default x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc configuration > - Prerequisites: > - Total 1 cases, 1 passed, 0 failed >=20 > - Prerequisites command / instruction: > Apply fm_ftag unit test patch. > export Port0 and Port1's GLORT ID to environment variables > export PORT1_GLORT=3D0x4200 > export PORT0_GLORT=3D0x4000 >=20 > - Case: Ftag forwarding unit test > Description: check fm10k nic can forwarding packets based on FTAG > Command / instruction: > Start test application and run fm10k_ftag_autotest > test -c f -n 4 -w 83:00.0,enable_ftag=3D1 -w 85:00.0,enable_ftag=3D= 1 > RTE>>fm10k_ftag_autotest > Send packet to Port0 and verify packet forwarded to Port1 > Receive 1 packets on port 0 > test for FTAG RX passed > Send out 1 packets with FTAG on port 0 > Receive 1 packets on port 1 > test for FTAG TX passed > Test OK >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wang Xiao W > > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 7:19 PM > > To: Chen, Jing D > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] fm10k: enable FTAG based forwarding > > > > v5: > > * Used kvargs api to parse the devargs parameter. > > * Put release note into the driver patch. > > > > v4: > > * Removed the build time config option, used devargs to config FTAG. > > * Rebased on head of dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04 branch. > > > > v3: > > * Removed "\n" in PMD_INIT_LOG. > > * Returned "-ENOTSUP" instead of -1 in VF FTAG use case. > > > > v2: > > * Gave an error message for VF FTAG use case. > > * Added a notice in the doc to emphasize that application should ensure > > an appropriate FTAG for every frame in FTAG based forwarding mode. > > > > Wang Xiao W (2): > > fm10k: enable FTAG based forwarding > > doc: add introduction for fm10k FTAG based forwarding > > > > doc/guides/nics/fm10k.rst | 16 ++++++++- > > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_04.rst | 2 ++ > > drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h | 2 ++ > > drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c | 65 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c | 15 ++++++++ > > drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c | 3 ++ > > 6 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 1.9.3