From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10D5199B0 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:26:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2017 04:26:50 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,481,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="907028359" Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.205]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2017 04:26:50 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.208) by fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 04:26:50 -0700 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 04:26:49 -0700 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.159]) by SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.152]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 19:26:48 +0800 From: "Li, Xiaoyun" To: "Li, Xiaoyun" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "Richardson, Bruce" CC: "Lu, Wenzhuo" , "Zhang, Helin" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Thomas Monjalon (thomas.monjalon@6wind.com)" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Thread-Index: AQHTPWSWh5F9rDSey0Ssw/DLaj2v+aLUeiGAgACWLjCAAA5HQA== Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:26:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1507042796-86318-1-git-send-email-xiaoyun.li@intel.com> <1507157911-8702-1-git-send-email-xiaoyun.li@intel.com> <1507157911-8702-2-git-send-email-xiaoyun.li@intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772585FAA48BC@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.0.116 dlp-reaction: no-action x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZjc0MGFlOTMtZTdkNi00ZGEzLWI5ODAtNzc3OGQ0YmQ4MmU3IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE2LjUuOS4zIiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IjRuQklGa2ZoblBCTllvNnV2K0I5Y0lwSWlFU0VvZ3UxMkY3WnN5d2ZWaTQ9In0= x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 11:26:52 -0000 Another thing, if add 17.11, the end is 17.08 or EXPERIMENTAL? Best Regards, Xiaoyun Li > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Li, Xiaoyun > Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 19:19 > To: Ananyev, Konstantin ; Richardson, > Bruce > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo ; Zhang, Helin > ; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon > (thomas.monjalon@6wind.com) > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over > memcpy >=20 >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ananyev, Konstantin > > Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 17:37 > > To: Li, Xiaoyun ; Richardson, Bruce > > > > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo ; Zhang, Helin > > ; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon > > (thomas.monjalon@6wind.com) > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy > > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map > > > b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map > > > index 8c08b8d..15a2fe9 100644 > > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map > > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map > > > @@ -241,5 +241,6 @@ EXPERIMENTAL { > > > rte_service_runstate_set; > > > rte_service_set_stats_enable; > > > rte_service_start_with_defaults; > > > + rte_memcpy_ptr; > > > > > > } DPDK_17.08; > > > > I am not an expert in DPDK versioning system, But shouldn't we create > > a > > 17.11 section here? > Should we create a 17.11 section? I am not sure who to ask for. >=20 > > Also I think an alphabetical order should be preserved here. > OK. >=20 > > Konstantin