From: "Traynor, Kevin" <kevin.traynor@intel.com>
To: Jun Xiao <jun.xiao@cloudnetengine.com>,
"Gray, Mark D" <mark.d.gray@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vSwitch Performance Comparison for NFV Use Case
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:50:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BC0FEEC7D7650749874CEC11314A88F7451FA6F6@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <----Tc------lRRzc$02c92e56-5191-4d60-b371-1937fd75dd2b@cloudnetengine.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jun Xiao
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 8:18 PM
> To: Gray, Mark D
> Cc: dev
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] vSwitch Performance Comparison for NFV Use Case
>
> Hi Mark,
> Last time we discussed methodologies for vSwitch performance comparison, and
> the performance data we published is more for typical TCP based applications
> in virtualized data centers.Today we shared more data for small packet size
> traffic at http://cloudnetengine.com/en/blog/2015/08/21/vswitch-performance-
> comparison-nfv-use-case, and the perfomance gets much closed (around 10-20%)
> between OVS-DPDK and CNE vSwitch as the tests are barely forwarding and
> without any other features.
>
> On the other hand, it's really hard to find any public performance data for
> OVS-DPDK under pNIC -> vSwitch -> VM -> vSwitch -> pNIC case. What I observed
> is that OVS-DPDK can have generally less than 3 MPPS on my setup (vhost user
> is used instead of IVSHMEM), don't know if the data are aligned with what you
> have?
That seems reasonable enough (maybe a little low) considering you are on a 2.4 GHz
and are using one logical core so the pmd will be sharing a physical core. As you
said you will get greater performance if you add another pmd. You will also get
better performance if you set rx_mrgbuf=off.
Did you core affinitize the pmd to an empty core and the pkt fwding qemu thread to
make sure they get the cycles they need?
> Thanks,Junwww.cloudnetengine.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-24 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-21 19:18 Jun Xiao
2015-08-24 16:50 ` Traynor, Kevin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BC0FEEC7D7650749874CEC11314A88F7451FA6F6@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=kevin.traynor@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jun.xiao@cloudnetengine.com \
--cc=mark.d.gray@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).