From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E44B1B5AF for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 01:23:59 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jan 2019 16:23:58 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,459,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="124822619" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.202]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2019 16:23:58 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx126.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.43) by fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 16:23:57 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx117.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.160]) by FMSMSX126.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 16:23:57 -0800 From: "Wiles, Keith" To: Thomas Monjalon CC: Daniel Waddington , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] DPDK on IBM Power9 Thread-Index: AQHUqGpSZYVqVk6qC0OeWdTEZOwlbaWoJloAgAAEeQA= Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:23:56 +0000 Message-ID: References: <12786706.2di15EqK5T@xps> In-Reply-To: <12786706.2di15EqK5T@xps> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.254.9.192] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK on IBM Power9 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:24:00 -0000 > On Jan 9, 2019, at 6:07 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > 09/01/2019 23:25, Daniel Waddington: >> Hi, >> I'm trying to run DPDK 18.11 on IBM Power9. Should it run? (I'n new to= DPDK on Power). >=20 > As mentioned in the release notes, Power9 is supported: > http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.html#known-issues >=20 > We are missing a strong support from IBM. > Several requests were already sent. > Given your email address, you should be able to forward the need ;) >=20 >>From the MAINTAINERS file: IBM POWER (alpha) M: Chao Zhu F: lib/librte_eal/common/arch/ppc_64/ F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/ppc_64/ F: drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_altivec.c F: examples/l3fwd/*altivec.h So Chao Zhu IBM is the maintainer of the ppc code. That was the only refere= nce I could find. Regards, Keith