From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hub021-ca-2.exch021.serverdata.net (hub021-ca-2.exch021.serverdata.net [64.78.22.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935A7921C for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 14:57:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from MBX021-W3-CA-4.exch021.domain.local ([10.254.4.80]) by HUB021-CA-2.exch021.domain.local ([10.254.4.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 05:57:38 -0800 From: Jason Terry To: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: ACL Library Information Request Thread-Index: AdEdUhUutbQklm2dSyKfBtxID0DE5g== Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:57:38 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [50.205.79.154] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] ACL Library Information Request X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:57:41 -0000 HI, I've read the documentation and looked at the example acl app. What is = the best practice for deleting rules? The API looks like a new context nee= ds created and built. Is that true? Also, this is more of a confirmation,= but RTE_ACL_MAX_FIELDS is defined as 64, so I assume that for ipv4 we can = have a tuple that's larger than 5? Thanks, Jason