From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from BLU004-OMC4S23.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s23.hotmail.com [65.55.111.162]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E00811D9 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:53:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from BLU179-W62 ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S23.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:53:21 -0800 X-TMN: [tXZKhaOOKGRqLQXJ++OsUEee6qvcA2za] X-Originating-Email: [mansooraa@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Ale Mansoor To: "dev@dpdk.org" Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:53:21 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Feb 2016 08:53:21.0939 (UTC) FILETIME=[A9145E30:01D164A9] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Splitting fast-path between two processes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:53:22 -0000 Hi=2C I have been using DPDK (under 2.1) with a single DPDK fastpath process=2C h= owever now I want to interface with another legacy user-space application t= hat is able to accept ethernet packets=2C what is the recommended/best perf= ormance approach to relay/share packets back-forth between my DPDK applicat= ion and this legacy application ? I want to avoid turning my legacy application into a complete DPDK applicat= ion if possible. Thanks in advance for your help. Regards=2C-Mansoor =