DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: "Sun, Chenmin" <chenmin.sun@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	"Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 4/4] net/i40e: FDIR update rate optimization
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:57:06 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR11MB40524BA4BBE16F56017463ACE37F0@BN6PR11MB4052.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715195329.34699-5-chenmin.sun@intel.com>


[...]

> +static inline unsigned char *
> +i40e_find_available_buffer(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	struct i40e_pf *pf = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_PF(dev->data->dev_private);
> +	struct i40e_fdir_info *fdir_info = &pf->fdir;
> +	struct i40e_tx_queue *txq = pf->fdir.txq;
> +	volatile struct i40e_tx_desc *txdp = &txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_tail + 1];
> +	uint32_t i;
> +
> +	/* no available buffer
> +	 * search for more available buffers from the current
> +	 * descriptor, until an unavailable one
> +	 */
> +	if (fdir_info->txq_available_buf_count <= 0) {
> +		uint16_t tmp_tail;
> +		volatile struct i40e_tx_desc *tmp_txdp;
> +
> +		tmp_tail = txq->tx_tail;
> +		tmp_txdp = &txq->tx_ring[tmp_tail + 1];
> +
> +		do {
> +			if ((tmp_txdp->cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> +
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) ==
> +
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE))
> +				fdir_info->txq_available_buf_count++;
> +			else
> +				break;
> +
> +			tmp_tail += 2;
> +			if (tmp_tail >= txq->nb_tx_desc)
> +				tmp_tail = 0;
> +		} while (tmp_tail != txq->tx_tail);
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * if txq_available_buf_count > 0, just use the next one is ok,
> +	 * else wait for the next DD until it's set to make sure the data
> +	 * had been fetched by hardware
> +	 */
> +	if (fdir_info->txq_available_buf_count > 0) {
> +		fdir_info->txq_available_buf_count--;
> +	} else {
> +		/* wait until the tx descriptor is ready */
> +		for (i = 0; i < I40E_FDIR_MAX_WAIT_US; i++) {
> +			if ((txdp->cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> +
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) ==
> +
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE))
> +				break;
> +			rte_delay_us(1);
> +		}
> +		if (i >= I40E_FDIR_MAX_WAIT_US) {
> +			PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR,
> +			    "Failed to program FDIR filter: time out to get DD on tx
> queue.");
> +			return NULL;
> +		}
> +	}
Why wait for I40E_FDIR_MAX_WAIT_US but not return NULL immediately?

[...]


>  i40e_flow_fdir_filter_programming(struct i40e_pf *pf,
>  				  enum i40e_filter_pctype pctype,
>  				  const struct i40e_fdir_filter_conf *filter,
> -				  bool add)
> +				  bool add, bool wait_status)
>  {
>  	struct i40e_tx_queue *txq = pf->fdir.txq;
>  	struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq = pf->fdir.rxq;
> @@ -2011,8 +2092,10 @@ i40e_flow_fdir_filter_programming(struct i40e_pf *pf,
>  	volatile struct i40e_tx_desc *txdp;
>  	volatile struct i40e_filter_program_desc *fdirdp;
>  	uint32_t td_cmd;
> -	uint16_t vsi_id, i;
> +	uint16_t vsi_id;
>  	uint8_t dest;
> +	uint32_t i;
> +	uint8_t retry_count = 0;
> 
>  	PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "filling filter programming descriptor.");
>  	fdirdp = (volatile struct i40e_filter_program_desc *)
> @@ -2087,7 +2170,8 @@ i40e_flow_fdir_filter_programming(struct i40e_pf *pf,
> 
>  	PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "filling transmit descriptor.");
>  	txdp = &txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_tail + 1];
> -	txdp->buffer_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(pf->fdir.dma_addr);
> +	txdp->buffer_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(pf->fdir.dma_addr[txq->tx_tail / 2]);
> +
[txq->tx_tail / 2] is not readable, how about use the avail pkt you get directly? Or another index to identify it?
 
>  	td_cmd = I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP |
>  		 I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_RS  |
>  		 I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_DUMMY;
> @@ -2100,25 +2184,34 @@ i40e_flow_fdir_filter_programming(struct i40e_pf *pf,
>  		txq->tx_tail = 0;
>  	/* Update the tx tail register */
>  	rte_wmb();
> +
> +	/* capture the previous error report(if any) from rx ring */
> +	while ((i40e_check_fdir_programming_status(rxq) < 0) &&
> +		(++retry_count < 100))
> +		PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "previous error report captured.");
> +
Why check FDIR ring for 100 times? And "&&" is used here, the log is only print if the 100th check fails? 

> 
> --
> 2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-16 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-12 18:00 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: i40e " chenmin.sun
2020-07-08  5:38 ` Xing, Beilei
2020-07-09  5:29   ` Sun, Chenmin
2020-07-08  8:41 ` Wang, Haiyue
2020-07-09  5:30   ` Sun, Chenmin
2020-07-09 14:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] " chenmin.sun
2020-07-10  2:50   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-07-13  8:33     ` Sun, Chenmin
2020-07-13 22:23   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3 0/2] " chenmin.sun
2020-07-13 22:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3 1/2] net/i40e: i40e FDIR update rate optimization data structures chenmin.sun
2020-07-13 22:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3 2/2] net/i40e: i40e FDIR update rate optimization chenmin.sun
2020-07-15 19:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 0/4] " chenmin.sun
2020-07-15 19:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 1/4] net/i40e: introducing the fdir space tracking chenmin.sun
2020-07-16 13:16         ` Wu, Jingjing
2020-07-15 19:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 2/4] net/i40e: FDIR flow memory management optimization chenmin.sun
2020-07-16 15:15         ` Wu, Jingjing
2020-07-15 19:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 3/4] net/i40e: move the i40e_get_outer_vlan to where it real needed chenmin.sun
2020-07-15 19:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 4/4] net/i40e: FDIR update rate optimization chenmin.sun
2020-07-16 13:57         ` Wu, Jingjing [this message]
2020-07-17  8:26           ` Sun, Chenmin
2020-07-17 17:19       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] i40e " chenmin.sun
2020-07-17 17:19         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] net/i40e: introducing the fdir space tracking chenmin.sun
2020-07-17 17:19         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] net/i40e: FDIR flow memory management optimization chenmin.sun
2020-07-17 17:19         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] net/i40e: move the i40e_get_outer_vlan to where it real needed chenmin.sun
2020-07-17 17:19         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] net/i40e: FDIR update rate optimization chenmin.sun
2020-07-17 17:36         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] i40e " chenmin.sun
2020-07-17 12:49           ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-07-17 17:36           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] net/i40e: introducing the fdir space tracking chenmin.sun
2020-07-17 17:36           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] net/i40e: FDIR flow memory management optimization chenmin.sun
2020-07-17 17:36           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] net/i40e: move the i40e_get_outer_vlan to where it real needed chenmin.sun
2020-07-17 17:36           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] net/i40e: FDIR update rate optimization chenmin.sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BN6PR11MB40524BA4BBE16F56017463ACE37F0@BN6PR11MB4052.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=chenmin.sun@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git