From: "Han, YingyaX" <yingyax.han@intel.com>
To: "Jiang, JunyuX" <junyux.jiang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>,
"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"Jiang, JunyuX" <junyux.jiang@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte counters
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 02:39:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN7PR11MB2818A9E2295A1F933FF1C76CFF210@BN7PR11MB2818.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200916015105.39815-1-junyux.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Yingya Han <yingyax.han@intel.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: stable <stable-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Junyu Jiang
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 9:51 AM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Jiang, JunyuX <junyux.jiang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte counters
This patch fixed the issue that rx/tx bytes overflowed on 48 bit limitation by enlarging the limitation.
Fixes: 4861cde46116 ("i40e: new poll mode driver")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Junyu Jiang <junyux.jiang@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h | 9 +++++++
2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 563f21d9d..4d4ea9861 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
@@ -3073,6 +3073,13 @@ i40e_update_vsi_stats(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
i40e_stat_update_48(hw, I40E_GLV_BPRCH(idx), I40E_GLV_BPRCL(idx),
vsi->offset_loaded, &oes->rx_broadcast,
&nes->rx_broadcast);
+ /* enlarge the limitation when rx_bytes overflowed */
+ if (vsi->offset_loaded) {
+ if (I40E_RXTX_BYTES_LOW(vsi->old_rx_bytes) > nes->rx_bytes)
+ nes->rx_bytes += (uint64_t)1 << I40E_48_BIT_WIDTH;
+ nes->rx_bytes += I40E_RXTX_BYTES_HIGH(vsi->old_rx_bytes);
+ }
+ vsi->old_rx_bytes = nes->rx_bytes;
/* exclude CRC bytes */
nes->rx_bytes -= (nes->rx_unicast + nes->rx_multicast +
nes->rx_broadcast) * RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN; @@ -3099,6 +3106,13 @@ i40e_update_vsi_stats(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
/* GLV_TDPC not supported */
i40e_stat_update_32(hw, I40E_GLV_TEPC(idx), vsi->offset_loaded,
&oes->tx_errors, &nes->tx_errors);
+ /* enlarge the limitation when tx_bytes overflowed */
+ if (vsi->offset_loaded) {
+ if (I40E_RXTX_BYTES_LOW(vsi->old_tx_bytes) > nes->tx_bytes)
+ nes->tx_bytes += (uint64_t)1 << I40E_48_BIT_WIDTH;
+ nes->tx_bytes += I40E_RXTX_BYTES_HIGH(vsi->old_tx_bytes);
+ }
+ vsi->old_tx_bytes = nes->tx_bytes;
vsi->offset_loaded = true;
PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "***************** VSI[%u] stats start *******************", @@ -3171,6 +3185,24 @@ i40e_read_stats_registers(struct i40e_pf *pf, struct i40e_hw *hw)
pf->offset_loaded,
&pf->internal_stats_offset.tx_broadcast,
&pf->internal_stats.tx_broadcast);
+ /* enlarge the limitation when internal rx/tx bytes overflowed */
+ if (pf->offset_loaded) {
+ if (I40E_RXTX_BYTES_LOW(pf->internal_old_rx_bytes) >
+ pf->internal_stats.rx_bytes)
+ pf->internal_stats.rx_bytes +=
+ (uint64_t)1 << I40E_48_BIT_WIDTH;
+ pf->internal_stats.rx_bytes +=
+ I40E_RXTX_BYTES_HIGH(pf->internal_old_rx_bytes);
+
+ if (I40E_RXTX_BYTES_LOW(pf->internal_old_tx_bytes) >
+ pf->internal_stats.tx_bytes)
+ pf->internal_stats.tx_bytes +=
+ (uint64_t)1 << I40E_48_BIT_WIDTH;
+ pf->internal_stats.tx_bytes +=
+ I40E_RXTX_BYTES_HIGH(pf->internal_old_tx_bytes);
+ }
+ pf->internal_old_rx_bytes = pf->internal_stats.rx_bytes;
+ pf->internal_old_tx_bytes = pf->internal_stats.tx_bytes;
/* exclude CRC size */
pf->internal_stats.rx_bytes -= (pf->internal_stats.rx_unicast + @@ -3194,6 +3226,14 @@ i40e_read_stats_registers(struct i40e_pf *pf, struct i40e_hw *hw)
I40E_GLPRT_BPRCL(hw->port),
pf->offset_loaded, &os->eth.rx_broadcast,
&ns->eth.rx_broadcast);
+ /* enlarge the limitation when rx_bytes overflowed */
+ if (pf->offset_loaded) {
+ if (I40E_RXTX_BYTES_LOW(pf->old_rx_bytes) > ns->eth.rx_bytes)
+ ns->eth.rx_bytes += (uint64_t)1 << I40E_48_BIT_WIDTH;
+ ns->eth.rx_bytes += I40E_RXTX_BYTES_HIGH(pf->old_rx_bytes);
+ }
+ pf->old_rx_bytes = ns->eth.rx_bytes;
+
/* Workaround: CRC size should not be included in byte statistics,
* so subtract RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN from the byte counter for each rx
* packet.
@@ -3252,6 +3292,13 @@ i40e_read_stats_registers(struct i40e_pf *pf, struct i40e_hw *hw)
I40E_GLPRT_BPTCL(hw->port),
pf->offset_loaded, &os->eth.tx_broadcast,
&ns->eth.tx_broadcast);
+ /* enlarge the limitation when tx_bytes overflowed */
+ if (pf->offset_loaded) {
+ if (I40E_RXTX_BYTES_LOW(pf->old_tx_bytes) > ns->eth.tx_bytes)
+ ns->eth.tx_bytes += (uint64_t)1 << I40E_48_BIT_WIDTH;
+ ns->eth.tx_bytes += I40E_RXTX_BYTES_HIGH(pf->old_tx_bytes);
+ }
+ pf->old_tx_bytes = ns->eth.tx_bytes;
ns->eth.tx_bytes -= (ns->eth.tx_unicast + ns->eth.tx_multicast +
ns->eth.tx_broadcast) * RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN;
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h index 19f821829..5d17be1f0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
@@ -282,6 +282,9 @@ struct rte_flow {
#define I40E_ETH_OVERHEAD \
(RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN + RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN + I40E_VLAN_TAG_SIZE * 2)
+#define I40E_RXTX_BYTES_HIGH(bytes) ((bytes) & ~I40E_48_BIT_MASK)
+#define I40E_RXTX_BYTES_LOW(bytes) ((bytes) & I40E_48_BIT_MASK)
+
struct i40e_adapter;
struct rte_pci_driver;
@@ -399,6 +402,8 @@ struct i40e_vsi {
uint8_t vlan_anti_spoof_on; /* The VLAN anti-spoofing enabled */
uint8_t vlan_filter_on; /* The VLAN filter enabled */
struct i40e_bw_info bw_info; /* VSI bandwidth information */
+ uint64_t old_rx_bytes;
+ uint64_t old_tx_bytes;
};
struct pool_entry {
@@ -1156,6 +1161,10 @@ struct i40e_pf {
uint16_t switch_domain_id;
struct i40e_vf_msg_cfg vf_msg_cfg;
+ uint64_t old_rx_bytes;
+ uint64_t old_tx_bytes;
+ uint64_t internal_old_rx_bytes;
+ uint64_t internal_old_tx_bytes;
};
enum pending_msg {
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-10 1:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Junyu Jiang
2020-09-10 2:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Han, YingyaX
2020-09-10 5:58 ` Guo, Jia
2020-09-10 6:45 ` Jiang, JunyuX
2020-09-16 1:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Junyu Jiang
2020-09-16 2:39 ` Han, YingyaX [this message]
2020-09-16 5:21 ` Guo, Jia
2020-09-16 5:50 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-09-16 12:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-18 3:44 ` Jiang, JunyuX
2020-09-18 9:23 ` Igor Ryzhov
2020-09-18 13:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-21 1:55 ` Jiang, JunyuX
2020-09-18 13:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-21 9:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Junyu Jiang
2020-09-21 11:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-22 7:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Junyu Jiang
2020-09-22 9:06 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-22 9:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Junyu Jiang
2020-09-22 12:59 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BN7PR11MB2818A9E2295A1F933FF1C76CFF210@BN7PR11MB2818.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=yingyax.han@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
--cc=junyux.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).