From: Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] test: avoid hang if queues are full and Tx fails
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 04:56:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN8PR18MB2482E1411CE3703B2F875BCFCF339@BN8PR18MB2482.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3120644.AJdgDx1Vlc@thomas>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 1:15 PM
> To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Rakesh Kudurumalla
> <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; david.marchand@redhat.com;
> ferruh.yigit@intel.com; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru;
> ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] test: avoid hang if queues are
> full and Tx fails
>
> octeontx2 driver is removed
> Can we close this patch?
Same behavior is observed with cnxk driver, so we need this patch
>
>
> 01/02/2022 07:30, Rakesh Kudurumalla:
> > ping
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rakesh Kudurumalla
> > > Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 2:35 PM
> > > To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Jerin Jacob
> Kollanukkaran
> > > <jerinj@marvell.com>
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; david.marchand@redhat.com;
> > > ferruh.yigit@intel.com; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru;
> > > ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com
> > > Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] test: avoid hang if
> > > queues are full and Tx fails
> > >
> > > ping
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Rakesh Kudurumalla
> > > > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 12:10 PM
> > > > To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Jerin Jacob
> > > > Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
> > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; david.marchand@redhat.com;
> > > > ferruh.yigit@intel.com; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru;
> > > > ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com
> > > > Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] test: avoid hang
> > > > if queues are full and Tx fails
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 2:44 PM
> > > > > To: Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>; Jerin Jacob
> > > > > Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
> > > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; david.marchand@redhat.com;
> > > > > ferruh.yigit@intel.com; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru;
> > > > > ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com
> > > > > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] test: avoid hang
> > > > > if queues are full and Tx fails
> > > > >
> > > > > 29/11/2021 09:52, Rakesh Kudurumalla:
> > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > > > > > > 22/11/2021 08:59, Rakesh Kudurumalla:
> > > > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > > > > > > > > 20/07/2021 18:50, Rakesh Kudurumalla:
> > > > > > > > > > Current pmd_perf_autotest() in continuous mode tries
> > > > > > > > > > to enqueue MAX_TRAFFIC_BURST completely before
> > > > > > > > > > starting the
> > > test.
> > > > > > > > > > Some drivers cannot accept complete MAX_TRAFFIC_BURST
> > > > > > > > > > even though
> > > > > > > rx+tx
> > > > > > > > > > desc
> > > > > > > > > count
> > > > > > > > > > can fit it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Which driver is failing to do so?
> > > > > > > > > Why it cannot enqueue 32 packets?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Octeontx2 driver is failing to enqueue because hardware
> > > > > > > > buffers are full
> > > > > > > before test.
> > > > >
> > > > > Aren't you stopping the support of octeontx2?
> > > > > Why do you care now?
> > > > > yes we are not supporting octeontx2,but this issue is observed
> > > > > in cnxk driver ,current patch fixes the same
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why hardware buffers are full?
> > > > > > Hardware buffers are full because number of number of
> > > > > > descriptors in continuous mode Is less than MAX_TRAFFIC_BURST,
> > > > > > so if enque fails , there is no way hardware can drop the Packets .
> > > > > > pmd_per_autotest application evaluates performance after
> > > > > > enqueueing
> > > packets Initially.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > pmd_perf_autotest() in continuous mode tries to enqueue
> > > > > > > > MAX_TRAFFIC_BURST (2048) before starting the test.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This patch changes behaviour to stop enqueuing after
> > > > > > > > > > few
> > > retries.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If there is a real limitation, there will be issues in
> > > > > > > > > more places than this test program.
> > > > > > > > > I feel it should be addressed either in the driver or at ethdev
> level.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -480,10 +483,19 @@ main_loop(__rte_unused void
> *args)
> > > > > > > > > > nb_tx = RTE_MIN(MAX_PKT_BURST,
> num);
> > > > > > > > > > nb_tx = rte_eth_tx_burst(portid, 0,
> > > > > > > > > >
> &tx_burst[idx],
> > > > > nb_tx);
> > > > > > > > > > + if (nb_tx == 0)
> > > > > > > > > > + retry_cnt++;
> > > > > > > > > > num -= nb_tx;
> > > > > > > > > > idx += nb_tx;
> > > > > > > > > > + if (retry_cnt == MAX_RETRY_COUNT)
> {
> > > > > > > > > > + retry_cnt = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-14 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210720124713.603674-1-rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
2021-07-20 16:50 ` [dpdk-dev] " Rakesh Kudurumalla
2021-10-19 10:19 ` Rakesh Kudurumalla
2021-10-29 7:18 ` Rakesh Kudurumalla
2021-11-12 11:32 ` [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-22 7:59 ` [EXT] " Rakesh Kudurumalla
2021-11-22 8:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-29 8:52 ` Rakesh Kudurumalla
2021-11-29 9:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-12-13 6:40 ` Rakesh Kudurumalla
2022-01-10 9:04 ` Rakesh Kudurumalla
2022-02-01 6:30 ` Rakesh Kudurumalla
2022-02-01 7:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-02-14 4:56 ` Rakesh Kudurumalla [this message]
2022-05-09 10:01 ` Rakesh Kudurumalla
2022-05-24 5:39 ` Rakesh Kudurumalla
2022-05-25 8:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BN8PR18MB2482E1411CE3703B2F875BCFCF339@BN8PR18MB2482.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=rkudurumalla@marvell.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).