From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <skarmarkar@sonusnet.com>
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-bl2on0093.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA000376C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 19:38:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from BY1PR03MB1338.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.109.20) by
 BY1PR03MB1340.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.109.22) with Microsoft SMTP
 Server (TLS) id 15.1.154.19; Fri, 15 May 2015 17:37:59 +0000
Received: from BY1PR03MB1338.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.109.20]) by
 BY1PR03MB1338.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.109.20]) with mapi id
 15.01.0154.018; Fri, 15 May 2015 17:37:59 +0000
From: Karmarkar Suyash <skarmarkar@sonusnet.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: Linux top command output 
Thread-Index: AdCPNKpdInvxue0RT72QOkfpOsGQgw==
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 17:37:58 +0000
Message-ID: <BY1PR03MB13385F7BC770360C016C727FB3C70@BY1PR03MB1338.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
authentication-results: dpdk.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [106.51.137.119]
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR03MB1340;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY1PR03MB13405CEE239227F452562AFFB3C70@BY1PR03MB1340.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0;
 RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BY1PR03MB1340; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:;
 SRVR:BY1PR03MB1340; 
x-forefront-prvs: 0577AD41D6
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;
 SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(99286002)(229853001)(2351001)(77096005)(102836002)(15975445007)(19300405004)(189998001)(5001960100002)(107886002)(110136002)(50986999)(54356999)(19580395003)(46102003)(2501003)(66066001)(86362001)(19625215002)(87936001)(2656002)(33656002)(16236675004)(77156002)(62966003)(92566002)(122556002)(40100003)(450100001)(74316001)(2900100001)(76576001)(140573001);
 DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR03MB1340;
 H:BY1PR03MB1338.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: sonusnet.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 May 2015 17:37:58.5681 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 29a671dc-ed7e-4a54-b1e5-8da1eb495dc3
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR03MB1340
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Linux top command output
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 17:38:02 -0000

Hi,

I have a query-why Linux top command does not show the NUMA pages allocated=
 by a DPDK process in Resident Memory? Is it a missing functionality in Lin=
ux top command or some limitation, Please excuse my ignorance if I missed s=
omething very obvious?

As an example if I allocated 512 NUMA pages for a DPDK application with eac=
h page of 2MB size then I would expect that in top command, when memory sta=
ts are display I would see "RES" memory of 1GB.

Regards
Suyash Karmarkar