DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>
To: nickcooper-zhangtonghao <nic@opencloud.tech>
Cc: "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] vmxnet3: Avoid memory leak in vmxnet3_dev_rx_queue_setup.
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 02:05:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY2PR05MB235953D3D13114C9CD89C3FCAF7F0@BY2PR05MB2359.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FD7588DA-7DE7-4EEC-8276-E51D71EE3A36@opencloud.tech>

Any downside with free/reallocation now that memzone can be freed?  Allocation with max ring size should work but is kind of wasteful in terms of memory usage and I assume this type of ring size change should not be a frequent operation.

From: nickcooper-zhangtonghao [mailto:nic@opencloud.tech]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 5:37 PM
To: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] vmxnet3: Avoid memory leak in vmxnet3_dev_rx_queue_setup.


On Jan 18, 2017, at 4:15 AM, Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com<mailto:yongwang@vmware.com>> wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Zhang [mailto:nic@opencloud.tech]
Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2017 7:00 PM
To: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com<mailto:yongwang@vmware.com>>
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com<mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>; Nick Zhang <nic@opencloud.tech<mailto:nic@opencloud.tech>>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] vmxnet3: Avoid memory leak in
vmxnet3_dev_rx_queue_setup.

This patch will check the "nb_desc" parameter for rx queue.
Rx vmxnet rings length should be between 128-4096.
The patch will release the rxq and re-allocation it soon
for different "nb_desc".

Signed-off-by: Nick Zhang <nic@opencloud.tech<mailto:nic@opencloud.tech>>
---
drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_rxtx.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_rxtx.c
b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_rxtx.c
index b109168..e77374f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_rxtx.c
@@ -926,6 +926,21 @@

     PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();

+    /* Rx vmxnet rings length should be between 128-4096 */
+    if (nb_desc < VMXNET3_DEF_RX_RING_SIZE) {
+         PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "VMXNET3 Rx Ring Size Min: 128");
+         return -EINVAL;
+    } else if (nb_desc > VMXNET3_RX_RING_MAX_SIZE) {
+         PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "VMXNET3 Rx Ring Size Max: 4096");
+         return -EINVAL;
+    }
+
+    /* Free memory prior to re-allocation if needed. */
+    if (dev->data->rx_queues[queue_idx] != NULL) {
+    vmxnet3_dev_rx_queue_release(dev->data->rx_queues[queue_idx]);

Currently vmxnet3_dev_rx_queue_release() does not free device ring memory.  As a result, the same device ring memory allocated based on the previous descriptor size will be used and that should also explain why you are observing seg fault with an increased ring size. If you handle the device ring memory free in vmxnet3_dev_rx_queue_release(), I think the pre-allocation of ring with max size will not be needed any more.

Yes, we should not free the pre-allocation of ring, but alloc only once ring with max size. I will submit v4.
Thank you.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-18  2:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-09  2:59 Nick Zhang
2017-01-09  2:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] vmxnet3: Avoid segfault caused by vmxnet3_dev_rx_queue_setup Nick Zhang
2017-01-09  2:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] vmxnet3: Avoid memory leak in vmxnet3_dev_tx_queue_setup Nick Zhang
2017-01-09  2:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] vmxnet3: Avoid segfault caused by vmxnet3_dev_tx_queue_setup Nick Zhang
2017-01-17 20:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] vmxnet3: Avoid memory leak in vmxnet3_dev_rx_queue_setup Yong Wang
2017-01-18  1:37   ` nickcooper-zhangtonghao
2017-01-18  2:05     ` Yong Wang [this message]
2017-01-18  2:41       ` nickcooper-zhangtonghao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BY2PR05MB235953D3D13114C9CD89C3FCAF7F0@BY2PR05MB2359.namprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=yongwang@vmware.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=nic@opencloud.tech \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).