DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Vargas, Hernan" <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: remove offload cost
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 18:01:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB44514BFA9D7B8CCA668CBE5BF8F59@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003bf3bd-bd2b-b365-5f00-7455369b7295@redhat.com>

Hi Maxime, 

I don’t see them on the baseband tree  dpdk-next-baseband

I did a clean clone, these are the last 3 commits
  dc0a5a0d2a (HEAD -> for-main, origin/for-main) test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure
  0e927787a3 test/bbdev: fix build issue with optional build flag
  51d49ccd23 test/bbdev: fix build issue with optional build flag

I don’t see the last 3 commits from patchwork (ie. the serie from that email)
  [v1,3/3] app/bbdev-test: remove offload cost optional build flag	bbdev: remove offload cost	- - -	3--	2022-12-14	Chautru, Nicolas	mcoquelin	Awaiting Upstream
  [v1,2/3] drivers/baseband: remove offload cost optional build flag	bbdev: remove offload cost	- - -	1--	2022-12-14	Chautru, Nicolas	mcoquelin	Awaiting Upstream
  [v1,1/3] test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure	bbdev: remove offload cost	- - -	11-	2022-12-14	Chautru, Nicolas	mcoquelin	Awaiting Upstream
[v3,3/3] test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure	test/bbdev: fix build issues with optional build flag	- 1 -	10--	2022-12-13	Chautru, Nicolas	mcoquelin	Awaiting Upstream
[v3,2/3] test/bbdev: fix build issue with optional build flag	test/bbdev: fix build issues with optional build flag	- 1 -	1--	2022-12-13	Chautru, Nicolas	mcoquelin	Awaiting Upstream
[v3,1/3] test/bbdev: fix build issue with optional build flag	test/bbdev: fix build issues with optional build flag	- 1 -	11-	2022-12-13	Chautru, Nicolas	mcoquelin	Awaiting Upstream

Do I miss something? This last serie doesn’t look applied on the remote repo. Could you double check?
Thanks
Nic


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 4:43 AM
> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: remove offload cost
> 
> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> On 1/3/23 23:07, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> >
> > Happy new year.
> 
> Happy new year.
> 
> > What does the state " Awaiting Upstream" mean in patchwork for that
> serie? Can this be applied?
> 
> It means it is the the bbdev tree, and is awaiting being pulled into the main
> tree.
> 
> So it is applied, but only in the bbdev tree for now.
> This should not be an issue since you shold base your work on top of the
> bbdev tree.
> 
> Regards,
> Maxime
> 
> > Thanks
> > Nic
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2022 3:34 PM
> >> To: dev@dpdk.org; maxime.coquelin@redhat.com
> >> Cc: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas@intel.com>; Chautru, Nicolas
> >> <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: remove offload cost
> >>
> >> Removing the optional build flag RTE_BBDEV_OFFLOAD_COST from Intel
> >> baseband PMDs and bbdev-test application.
> >> This helps to simplify build variants complexity causing compilation
> >> issues to be missed.
> >>
> >> Maxime, the first commit is actually a miss related to last commit on
> >> top of tree, you may want to merge these two commits together in the
> history.
> >> Sorry for missing it earlier.
> >>
> >>
> >> Nicolas Chautru (3):
> >>    test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure
> >>    drivers/baseband: remove offload cost optional build flag
> >>    app/bbdev-test: remove offload cost optional build flag
> >>
> >>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c              | 29 +-------
> >>   drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h             | 12 +---
> >>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c         |  2 -
> >>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc200_pmd.c         |  2 -
> >>   .../fpga_5gnr_fec/rte_fpga_5gnr_fec.c         | 10 ---
> >>   drivers/baseband/fpga_lte_fec/fpga_lte_fec.c  | 10 ---
> >>   .../baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c  | 70 ++++---------------
> >>   7 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-04 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-14 23:33 Nicolas Chautru
2022-12-14 23:33 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure Nicolas Chautru
2023-01-06 14:51   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-06 15:37     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-01-10  8:32   ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-12-14 23:33 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers/baseband: remove offload cost optional build flag Nicolas Chautru
2023-01-06 14:54   ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-12-14 23:33 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] app/bbdev-test: " Nicolas Chautru
2023-01-06 14:55   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-03 22:07 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: remove offload cost Chautru, Nicolas
2023-01-04 12:42   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-04 18:01     ` Chautru, Nicolas [this message]
2023-01-05  9:53       ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-10  8:43 ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BY5PR11MB44514BFA9D7B8CCA668CBE5BF8F59@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hernan.vargas@intel.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).