DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: "david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/7] app/bbdev: define wait for offload
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:04:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB44514C7E05AC43FBE74760BBF8190@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cd1a627-1353-7ff0-3b6d-58ef3f535611@redhat.com>

> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 6:33 AM
> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> akhil.goyal@nxp.com
> Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] app/bbdev: define wait for offload
> 
> 
> On 10/23/20 4:42 PM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> > Replacing magic number for default wait time for hw offload.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Liu Tianjiao <tianjiao.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 9 +++++----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > index f30cbdb..39f06db 100644
> > --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> >
> >  #define MAX_QUEUES RTE_MAX_LCORE
> >  #define TEST_REPETITIONS 1000
> > +#define WAIT_OFFLOAD_US 1000
> 
> Why wasn't 200 used ?
> 
> Tom

1ms is a more typical expectation for workload (TTI in numerology 0 for 5GNR and LTE). 


> 
> >
> >  #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_BBDEV_FPGA_LTE_FEC  #include
> <fpga_lte_fec.h>
> > @@ -4451,7 +4452,7 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct
> active_device *ad,
> >  		time_st->enq_acc_total_time += stats.acc_offload_cycles;
> >
> >  		/* give time for device to process ops */
> > -		rte_delay_us(200);
> > +		rte_delay_us(WAIT_OFFLOAD_US);
> >
> >  		/* Start time meas for dequeue function offload latency */
> >  		deq_start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise(); @@ -4542,7 +4543,7
> @@ typedef
> > int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
> >  		time_st->enq_acc_total_time += stats.acc_offload_cycles;
> >
> >  		/* give time for device to process ops */
> > -		rte_delay_us(200);
> > +		rte_delay_us(WAIT_OFFLOAD_US);
> >
> >  		/* Start time meas for dequeue function offload latency */
> >  		deq_start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise(); @@ -4630,7 +4631,7
> @@ typedef
> > int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
> >  		time_st->enq_acc_total_time += stats.acc_offload_cycles;
> >
> >  		/* give time for device to process ops */
> > -		rte_delay_us(200);
> > +		rte_delay_us(WAIT_OFFLOAD_US);
> >
> >  		/* Start time meas for dequeue function offload latency */
> >  		deq_start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise(); @@ -4713,7 +4714,7
> @@ typedef
> > int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
> >  		time_st->enq_acc_total_time += stats.acc_offload_cycles;
> >
> >  		/* give time for device to process ops */
> > -		rte_delay_us(200);
> > +		rte_delay_us(WAIT_OFFLOAD_US);
> >
> >  		/* Start time meas for dequeue function offload latency */
> >  		deq_start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise();


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-26 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-23 23:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/7] BBDEV test updates Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/7] app/bbdev: add explicit ut for latency vs validation Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 12:55   ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 17:30     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-28 20:37       ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/7] app/bbdev: add explicit check for counters Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:05   ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 16:29     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-28 20:31       ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/7] app/bbdev: include explicit HARQ preloading Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:31   ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 16:50     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-28 20:33       ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/7] app/bbdev: define wait for offload Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:33   ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 16:04     ` Chautru, Nicolas [this message]
2020-10-28 20:24       ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/7] app/bbdev: skip bler ut when compression is used Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:35   ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/7] app/bbdev: reduce duration of throughput test Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:39   ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/7] app/bbdev: update offload test to dequeue full ring Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:55   ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 16:27     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-28 20:28       ` Tom Rix
2020-10-24  7:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/7] BBDEV test updates David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BY5PR11MB44514C7E05AC43FBE74760BBF8190@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).