DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Xu, Rosen" <rosen.xu@intel.com>,
	"dave.burley@accelercomm.com" <dave.burley@accelercomm.com>,
	"aidan.goddard@accelercomm.com" <aidan.goddard@accelercomm.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"Liu, Tianjiao" <tianjiao.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 10/10] baseband/acc100: add configure function
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:54:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB4451515542DE7A0C8E57367EF8330@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66758688-f00e-c757-0b9e-5bb365ace5de@redhat.com>

Hi Tom, 

> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> On 9/28/20 5:29 PM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> > Add configure function to configure the PF from within the 
> > bbdev-test itself without external application configuration the device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Liu Tianjiao <Tianjiao.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c                   |  72 +++
> >  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst             |   5 +
> >  drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build                |   2 +
> >  drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_cfg.h           |  17 +
> >  drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c           | 505
> +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../acc100/rte_pmd_bbdev_acc100_version.map        |   7 +
> >  6 files changed, 608 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > index 45c0d62..32f23ff 100644
> > --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,18 @@
> >  #define FLR_5G_TIMEOUT 610
> >  #endif
> >
> > +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_BBDEV_ACC100
> > +#include <rte_acc100_cfg.h>
> > +#define ACC100PF_DRIVER_NAME   ("intel_acc100_pf")
> > +#define ACC100VF_DRIVER_NAME   ("intel_acc100_vf")
> > +#define ACC100_QMGR_NUM_AQS 16
> > +#define ACC100_QMGR_NUM_QGS 2
> > +#define ACC100_QMGR_AQ_DEPTH 5
> > +#define ACC100_QMGR_INVALID_IDX -1
> > +#define ACC100_QMGR_RR 1
> > +#define ACC100_QOS_GBR 0
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  #define OPS_CACHE_SIZE 256U
> >  #define OPS_POOL_SIZE_MIN 511U /* 0.5K per queue */
> >
> > @@ -653,6 +665,66 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct
> active_device *ad,
> >  				info->dev_name);
> >  	}
> >  #endif
> > +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_BBDEV_ACC100
> seems like this function would break if one of the other bbdev's were 
> #defined.

No these are independent. By default they are all defined. 


> > +	if ((get_init_device() == true) &&
> > +		(!strcmp(info->drv.driver_name,
> ACC100PF_DRIVER_NAME))) {
> > +		struct acc100_conf conf;
> > +		unsigned int i;
> > +
> > +		printf("Configure ACC100 FEC Driver %s with default
> values\n",
> > +				info->drv.driver_name);
> > +
> > +		/* clear default configuration before initialization */
> > +		memset(&conf, 0, sizeof(struct acc100_conf));
> > +
> > +		/* Always set in PF mode for built-in configuration */
> > +		conf.pf_mode_en = true;
> > +		for (i = 0; i < RTE_ACC100_NUM_VFS; ++i) {
> > +			conf.arb_dl_4g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
> > +			conf.arb_dl_4g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
> > +			conf.arb_dl_4g[i].round_robin_weight =
> ACC100_QMGR_RR;
> > +			conf.arb_ul_4g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
> > +			conf.arb_ul_4g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
> > +			conf.arb_ul_4g[i].round_robin_weight =
> ACC100_QMGR_RR;
> > +			conf.arb_dl_5g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
> > +			conf.arb_dl_5g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
> > +			conf.arb_dl_5g[i].round_robin_weight =
> ACC100_QMGR_RR;
> > +			conf.arb_ul_5g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
> > +			conf.arb_ul_5g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
> > +			conf.arb_ul_5g[i].round_robin_weight =
> ACC100_QMGR_RR;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		conf.input_pos_llr_1_bit = true;
> > +		conf.output_pos_llr_1_bit = true;
> > +		conf.num_vf_bundles = 1; /**< Number of VF bundles to
> setup */
> > +
> > +		conf.q_ul_4g.num_qgroups = ACC100_QMGR_NUM_QGS;
> > +		conf.q_ul_4g.first_qgroup_index =
> ACC100_QMGR_INVALID_IDX;
> > +		conf.q_ul_4g.num_aqs_per_groups =
> ACC100_QMGR_NUM_AQS;
> > +		conf.q_ul_4g.aq_depth_log2 = ACC100_QMGR_AQ_DEPTH;
> > +		conf.q_dl_4g.num_qgroups = ACC100_QMGR_NUM_QGS;
> > +		conf.q_dl_4g.first_qgroup_index =
> ACC100_QMGR_INVALID_IDX;
> > +		conf.q_dl_4g.num_aqs_per_groups =
> ACC100_QMGR_NUM_AQS;
> > +		conf.q_dl_4g.aq_depth_log2 = ACC100_QMGR_AQ_DEPTH;
> > +		conf.q_ul_5g.num_qgroups = ACC100_QMGR_NUM_QGS;
> > +		conf.q_ul_5g.first_qgroup_index =
> ACC100_QMGR_INVALID_IDX;
> > +		conf.q_ul_5g.num_aqs_per_groups =
> ACC100_QMGR_NUM_AQS;
> > +		conf.q_ul_5g.aq_depth_log2 = ACC100_QMGR_AQ_DEPTH;
> > +		conf.q_dl_5g.num_qgroups = ACC100_QMGR_NUM_QGS;
> > +		conf.q_dl_5g.first_qgroup_index =
> ACC100_QMGR_INVALID_IDX;
> > +		conf.q_dl_5g.num_aqs_per_groups =
> ACC100_QMGR_NUM_AQS;
> > +		conf.q_dl_5g.aq_depth_log2 = ACC100_QMGR_AQ_DEPTH;
> > +
> > +		/* setup PF with configuration information */
> > +		ret = acc100_configure(info->dev_name, &conf);
> > +		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret,
> > +				"Failed to configure ACC100 PF for bbdev
> %s",
> > +				info->dev_name);
> > +		/* Let's refresh this now this is configured */
> > +	}
> > +	rte_bbdev_info_get(dev_id, info);
> The other bbdev's do not call rte_bbdev_info_get, can this be removed ?

Actually it should be added outside for all versions post-configuraion. Thanks

> > +#endif
> > +
> >  	nb_queues = RTE_MIN(rte_lcore_count(), info- drv.max_num_queues);
> >  	nb_queues = RTE_MIN(nb_queues, (unsigned int) MAX_QUEUES);
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst
> > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst
> > index 73ac08f..c8d0586 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst
> > @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ New Features
> >       Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin.
> >       =======================================================
> >
> > +* **Added Intel ACC100 bbdev PMD.**
> > +
> > +  Added a new ``acc100`` bbdev driver for the Intel\ |reg| ACC100 
> > + accelerator  also known as Mount Bryce.  See the 
> > + :doc:`../bbdevs/acc100` BBDEV guide for more details on this new driver.
> >
> >  Removed Items
> >  -------------
> > diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build
> > b/drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build
> > index 8afafc2..7ac44dc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build
> > +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build
> > @@ -4,3 +4,5 @@
> >  deps += ['bbdev', 'bus_vdev', 'ring', 'pci', 'bus_pci']
> >
> >  sources = files('rte_acc100_pmd.c')
> > +
> > +install_headers('rte_acc100_cfg.h')
> > diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_cfg.h
> > b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_cfg.h
> > index 73bbe36..7f523bc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_cfg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_cfg.h
> > @@ -89,6 +89,23 @@ struct acc100_conf {
> >  	struct rte_arbitration_t arb_dl_5g[RTE_ACC100_NUM_VFS];  };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * Configure a ACC100 device
> > + *
> > + * @param dev_name
> > + *   The name of the device. This is the short form of PCI BDF, e.g. 00:01.0.
> > + *   It can also be retrieved for a bbdev device from the dev_name field in
> the
> > + *   rte_bbdev_info structure returned by rte_bbdev_info_get().
> > + * @param conf
> > + *   Configuration to apply to ACC100 HW.
> > + *
> > + * @return
> > + *   Zero on success, negative value on failure.
> > + */
> > +__rte_experimental
> > +int
> > +acc100_configure(const char *dev_name, struct acc100_conf *conf);
> > +
> >  #ifdef __cplusplus
> >  }
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> > b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> > index 3589814..b50dd32 100644
> > --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> > @@ -85,6 +85,26 @@
> >
> >  enum {UL_4G = 0, UL_5G, DL_4G, DL_5G, NUM_ACC};
> >
> > +/* Return the accelerator enum for a Queue Group Index */ static 
> > +inline int accFromQgid(int qg_idx, const struct acc100_conf
> > +*acc100_conf) {
> > +	int accQg[ACC100_NUM_QGRPS];
> > +	int NumQGroupsPerFn[NUM_ACC];
> > +	int acc, qgIdx, qgIndex = 0;
> > +	for (qgIdx = 0; qgIdx < ACC100_NUM_QGRPS; qgIdx++)
> > +		accQg[qgIdx] = 0;
> > +	NumQGroupsPerFn[UL_4G] = acc100_conf->q_ul_4g.num_qgroups;
> > +	NumQGroupsPerFn[UL_5G] = acc100_conf->q_ul_5g.num_qgroups;
> > +	NumQGroupsPerFn[DL_4G] = acc100_conf->q_dl_4g.num_qgroups;
> > +	NumQGroupsPerFn[DL_5G] = acc100_conf->q_dl_5g.num_qgroups;
> > +	for (acc = UL_4G;  acc < NUM_ACC; acc++)
> > +		for (qgIdx = 0; qgIdx < NumQGroupsPerFn[acc]; qgIdx++)
> > +			accQg[qgIndex++] = acc;
> 
> This looks inefficient, is there a way this could be calculated 
> without filling arrays to
> 
> access 1 value ?

That is not time critical, and the same common code is run each time. 

> 
> > +	acc = accQg[qg_idx];
> > +	return acc;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Return the queue topology for a Queue Group Index */  static 
> > inline void  qtopFromAcc(struct rte_q_topology_t **qtop, int 
> > acc_enum, @@ -113,6 +133,30 @@
> >  	*qtop = p_qtop;
> >  }
> >
> > +/* Return the AQ depth for a Queue Group Index */ static inline int 
> > +aqDepth(int qg_idx, struct acc100_conf *acc100_conf) {
> > +	struct rte_q_topology_t *q_top = NULL;
> > +	int acc_enum = accFromQgid(qg_idx, acc100_conf);
> > +	qtopFromAcc(&q_top, acc_enum, acc100_conf);
> > +	if (unlikely(q_top == NULL))
> > +		return 0;
> 
> This error is not handled well be the callers.
> 
> aqNum is similar.

This fails in a consistent basis, by having not queue available and handling this as the default case.

> 
> > +	return q_top->aq_depth_log2;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Return the AQ depth for a Queue Group Index */ static inline int 
> > +aqNum(int qg_idx, struct acc100_conf *acc100_conf) {
> > +	struct rte_q_topology_t *q_top = NULL;
> > +	int acc_enum = accFromQgid(qg_idx, acc100_conf);
> > +	qtopFromAcc(&q_top, acc_enum, acc100_conf);
> > +	if (unlikely(q_top == NULL))
> > +		return 0;
> > +	return q_top->num_aqs_per_groups;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void
> >  initQTop(struct acc100_conf *acc100_conf)  { @@ -4177,3 +4221,464 
> > @@ static int acc100_pci_remove(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev) 
> > RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE(ACC100PF_DRIVER_NAME,
> > pci_id_acc100_pf_map);
> RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI(ACC100VF_DRIVER_NAME,
> > acc100_pci_vf_driver);
> > RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE(ACC100VF_DRIVER_NAME,
> > pci_id_acc100_vf_map);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Implementation to fix the power on status of some 5GUL engines
> > + * This requires DMA permission if ported outside DPDK
> This sounds like a workaround, can more detail be added here ?

There are comments through the code I believe:
  - /* Detect engines in undefined state */
  - /* Force each engine which is in unspecified state */
  - /* Reset LDPC Cores */
  - /* Check engine power-on status again */ Do you believe this is not explicit enough. Power-on status may be in an undefined state hence this engine are avtivate with dummy payload to make sure they are in a predicable state once configuration is done. 

> > + */
> > +static void
> > +poweron_cleanup(struct rte_bbdev *bbdev, struct acc100_device *d,
> > +		struct acc100_conf *conf)
> > +{
> > +	int i, template_idx, qg_idx;
> > +	uint32_t address, status, payload;
> > +	printf("Need to clear power-on 5GUL status in internal memory\n");
> > +	/* Reset LDPC Cores */
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ACC100_ENGINES_MAX; i++)
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfFecUl5gCntrlReg +
> > +				ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * i,
> ACC100_RESET_HI);
> > +	usleep(LONG_WAIT);
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ACC100_ENGINES_MAX; i++)
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfFecUl5gCntrlReg +
> > +				ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * i,
> ACC100_RESET_LO);
> > +	usleep(LONG_WAIT);
> > +	/* Prepare dummy workload */
> > +	alloc_2x64mb_sw_rings_mem(bbdev, d, 0);
> > +	/* Set base addresses */
> > +	uint32_t phys_high = (uint32_t)(d->sw_rings_phys >> 32);
> > +	uint32_t phys_low  = (uint32_t)(d->sw_rings_phys &
> > +			~(ACC100_SIZE_64MBYTE-1));
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfDmaFec5GulDescBaseHiRegVf,
> phys_high);
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfDmaFec5GulDescBaseLoRegVf, phys_low);
> > +
> > +	/* Descriptor for a dummy 5GUL code block processing*/
> > +	union acc100_dma_desc *desc = NULL;
> > +	desc = d->sw_rings;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[0].address = d->sw_rings_phys +
> > +			ACC100_DESC_FCW_OFFSET;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[0].blen = ACC100_FCW_LD_BLEN;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[0].blkid = ACC100_DMA_BLKID_FCW;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[0].last = 0;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[0].dma_ext = 0;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[1].address = d->sw_rings_phys + 512;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[1].blkid = ACC100_DMA_BLKID_IN;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[1].last = 1;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[1].dma_ext = 0;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[1].blen = 44;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[2].address = d->sw_rings_phys + 1024;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[2].blkid = ACC100_DMA_BLKID_OUT_ENC;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[2].last = 1;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[2].dma_ext = 0;
> > +	desc->req.data_ptrs[2].blen = 5;
> > +	/* Dummy FCW */
> > +	desc->req.fcw_ld.FCWversion = ACC100_FCW_VER;
> > +	desc->req.fcw_ld.qm = 1;
> > +	desc->req.fcw_ld.nfiller = 30;
> > +	desc->req.fcw_ld.BG = 2 - 1;
> > +	desc->req.fcw_ld.Zc = 7;
> > +	desc->req.fcw_ld.ncb = 350;
> > +	desc->req.fcw_ld.rm_e = 4;
> > +	desc->req.fcw_ld.itmax = 10;
> > +	desc->req.fcw_ld.gain_i = 1;
> > +	desc->req.fcw_ld.gain_h = 1;
> > +
> > +	int engines_to_restart[SIG_UL_5G_LAST + 1] = {0};
> > +	int num_failed_engine = 0;
> > +	/* Detect engines in undefined state */
> > +	for (template_idx = SIG_UL_5G; template_idx <= SIG_UL_5G_LAST;
> > +			template_idx++) {
> > +		/* Check engine power-on status */
> > +		address = HwPfFecUl5gIbDebugReg +
> > +				ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * template_idx;
> > +		status = (acc100_reg_read(d, address) >> 4) & 0xF;
> > +		if (status == 0) {
> > +			engines_to_restart[num_failed_engine] =
> template_idx;
> > +			num_failed_engine++;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	int numQqsAcc = conf->q_ul_5g.num_qgroups;
> > +	int numQgs = conf->q_ul_5g.num_qgroups;
> > +	payload = 0;
> > +	for (qg_idx = numQqsAcc; qg_idx < (numQgs + numQqsAcc);
> qg_idx++)
> > +		payload |= (1 << qg_idx);
> > +	/* Force each engine which is in unspecified state */
> > +	for (i = 0; i < num_failed_engine; i++) {
> > +		int failed_engine = engines_to_restart[i];
> > +		printf("Force engine %d\n", failed_engine);
> > +		for (template_idx = SIG_UL_5G; template_idx <=
> SIG_UL_5G_LAST;
> > +				template_idx++) {
> > +			address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
> > +					+ BYTES_IN_WORD * template_idx;
> > +			if (template_idx == failed_engine)
> > +				acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +			else
> > +				acc100_reg_write(d, address, 0);
> > +		}
> > +		/* Reset descriptor header */
> > +		desc->req.word0 = ACC100_DMA_DESC_TYPE;
> > +		desc->req.word1 = 0;
> > +		desc->req.word2 = 0;
> > +		desc->req.word3 = 0;
> > +		desc->req.numCBs = 1;
> > +		desc->req.m2dlen = 2;
> > +		desc->req.d2mlen = 1;
> > +		/* Enqueue the code block for processing */
> > +		union acc100_enqueue_reg_fmt enq_req;
> > +		enq_req.val = 0;
> > +		enq_req.addr_offset = ACC100_DESC_OFFSET;
> > +		enq_req.num_elem = 1;
> > +		enq_req.req_elem_addr = 0;
> > +		rte_wmb();
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfQmgrIngressAq + 0x100,
> enq_req.val);
> > +		usleep(LONG_WAIT * 100);
> > +		if (desc->req.word0 != 2)
> > +			printf("DMA Response %#"PRIx32"\n", desc-
> >req.word0);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Reset LDPC Cores */
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ACC100_ENGINES_MAX; i++)
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfFecUl5gCntrlReg +
> > +				ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * i,
> ACC100_RESET_HI);
> > +	usleep(LONG_WAIT);
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ACC100_ENGINES_MAX; i++)
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfFecUl5gCntrlReg +
> > +				ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * i,
> ACC100_RESET_LO);
> > +	usleep(LONG_WAIT);
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfHi5GHardResetReg,
> ACC100_RESET_HARD);
> > +	usleep(LONG_WAIT);
> > +	int numEngines = 0;
> > +	/* Check engine power-on status again */
> > +	for (template_idx = SIG_UL_5G; template_idx <= SIG_UL_5G_LAST;
> > +			template_idx++) {
> > +		address = HwPfFecUl5gIbDebugReg +
> > +				ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * template_idx;
> > +		status = (acc100_reg_read(d, address) >> 4) & 0xF;
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
> > +				+ BYTES_IN_WORD * template_idx;
> > +		if (status == 1) {
> > +			acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +			numEngines++;
> > +		} else
> > +			acc100_reg_write(d, address, 0);
> > +	}
> > +	printf("Number of 5GUL engines %d\n", numEngines);
> > +
> > +	if (d->sw_rings_base != NULL)
> > +		rte_free(d->sw_rings_base);
> > +	usleep(LONG_WAIT);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Initial configuration of a ACC100 device prior to running
> > +configure() */ int acc100_configure(const char *dev_name, struct 
> > +acc100_conf *conf) {
> > +	rte_bbdev_log(INFO, "acc100_configure");
> > +	uint32_t payload, address, status;
> 
> maybe value or data would be a better variable name than payload.
> 
> would mean changing acc100_reg_write

transparent to me, but can change given DPDK uses term value. 


> 
> > +	int qg_idx, template_idx, vf_idx, acc, i;
> > +	struct rte_bbdev *bbdev = rte_bbdev_get_named_dev(dev_name);
> > +
> > +	/* Compile time checks */
> > +	RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acc100_dma_req_desc) != 256);
> > +	RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(union acc100_dma_desc) != 256);
> > +	RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acc100_fcw_td) != 24);
> > +	RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acc100_fcw_te) != 32);
> > +
> > +	if (bbdev == NULL) {
> > +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> > +		"Invalid dev_name (%s), or device is not yet initialised",
> > +		dev_name);
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> > +	struct acc100_device *d = bbdev->data->dev_private;
> > +
> > +	/* Store configuration */
> > +	rte_memcpy(&d->acc100_conf, conf, sizeof(d->acc100_conf));
> > +
> > +	/* PCIe Bridge configuration */
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, HwPfPcieGpexBridgeControl,
> ACC100_CFG_PCI_BRIDGE);
> > +	for (i = 1; i < 17; i++)
> 
> 17 is a magic number, use a #define
> 
> this is a general issue.

These are only used once but still agreed.

> 
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d,
> > +
> 	HwPfPcieGpexAxiAddrMappingWindowPexBaseHigh
> > +				+ i * 16, 0);
> > +
> > +	/* PCIe Link Trainiing and Status State Machine */
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, HwPfPcieGpexLtssmStateCntrl, 0xDFC00000);
> > +
> > +	/* Prevent blocking AXI read on BRESP for AXI Write */
> > +	address = HwPfPcieGpexAxiPioControl;
> > +	payload = ACC100_CFG_PCI_AXI;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* 5GDL PLL phase shift */
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfChaDl5gPllPhshft0, 0x1);
> > +
> > +	/* Explicitly releasing AXI as this may be stopped after PF FLR/BME */
> > +	address = HWPfDmaAxiControl;
> > +	payload = 1;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* DDR Configuration */
> > +	address = HWPfDdrBcTim6;
> > +	payload = acc100_reg_read(d, address);
> > +	payload &= 0xFFFFFFFB; /* Bit 2 */ #ifdef ACC100_DDR_ECC_ENABLE
> > +	payload |= 0x4;
> > +#endif
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +	address = HWPfDdrPhyDqsCountNum;
> > +#ifdef ACC100_DDR_ECC_ENABLE
> > +	payload = 9;
> > +#else
> > +	payload = 8;
> > +#endif
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* Set default descriptor signature */
> > +	address = HWPfDmaDescriptorSignatuture;
> > +	payload = 0;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* Enable the Error Detection in DMA */
> > +	payload = ACC100_CFG_DMA_ERROR;
> > +	address = HWPfDmaErrorDetectionEn;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* AXI Cache configuration */
> > +	payload = ACC100_CFG_AXI_CACHE;
> > +	address = HWPfDmaAxcacheReg;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* Default DMA Configuration (Qmgr Enabled) */
> > +	address = HWPfDmaConfig0Reg;
> > +	payload = 0;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +	address = HWPfDmaQmanen;
> > +	payload = 0;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* Default RLIM/ALEN configuration */
> > +	address = HWPfDmaConfig1Reg;
> > +	payload = (1 << 31) + (23 << 8) + (1 << 6) + 7;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* Configure DMA Qmanager addresses */
> > +	address = HWPfDmaQmgrAddrReg;
> > +	payload = HWPfQmgrEgressQueuesTemplate;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* ===== Qmgr Configuration ===== */
> > +	/* Configuration of the AQueue Depth QMGR_GRP_0_DEPTH_LOG2
> for UL */
> > +	int totalQgs = conf->q_ul_4g.num_qgroups +
> > +			conf->q_ul_5g.num_qgroups +
> > +			conf->q_dl_4g.num_qgroups +
> > +			conf->q_dl_5g.num_qgroups;
> > +	for (qg_idx = 0; qg_idx < totalQgs; qg_idx++) {
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrDepthLog2Grp +
> > +		BYTES_IN_WORD * qg_idx;
> > +		payload = aqDepth(qg_idx, conf);
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrTholdGrp +
> > +		BYTES_IN_WORD * qg_idx;
> > +		payload = (1 << 16) + (1 << (aqDepth(qg_idx, conf) - 1));
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Template Priority in incremental order */
> > +	for (template_idx = 0; template_idx < ACC100_NUM_TMPL;
> > +			template_idx++) {
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg0Indx +
> > +		BYTES_IN_WORD * (template_idx % 8);
> > +		payload = TMPL_PRI_0;
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg1Indx +
> > +		BYTES_IN_WORD * (template_idx % 8);
> > +		payload = TMPL_PRI_1;
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg2indx +
> > +		BYTES_IN_WORD * (template_idx % 8);
> > +		payload = TMPL_PRI_2;
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg3Indx +
> > +		BYTES_IN_WORD * (template_idx % 8);
> > +		payload = TMPL_PRI_3;
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	address = HWPfQmgrGrpPriority;
> > +	payload = ACC100_CFG_QMGR_HI_P;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* Template Configuration */
> > +	for (template_idx = 0; template_idx < ACC100_NUM_TMPL;
> template_idx++) {
> > +		payload = 0;
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
> > +				+ BYTES_IN_WORD * template_idx;
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +	}
> > +	/* 4GUL */
> > +	int numQgs = conf->q_ul_4g.num_qgroups;
> > +	int numQqsAcc = 0;
> > +	payload = 0;
> > +	for (qg_idx = numQqsAcc; qg_idx < (numQgs + numQqsAcc);
> qg_idx++)
> > +		payload |= (1 << qg_idx);
> > +	for (template_idx = SIG_UL_4G; template_idx <= SIG_UL_4G_LAST;
> > +			template_idx++) {
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
> > +				+ BYTES_IN_WORD*template_idx;
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +	}
> > +	/* 5GUL */
> > +	numQqsAcc += numQgs;
> > +	numQgs	= conf->q_ul_5g.num_qgroups;
> > +	payload = 0;
> > +	int numEngines = 0;
> > +	for (qg_idx = numQqsAcc; qg_idx < (numQgs + numQqsAcc);
> qg_idx++)
> > +		payload |= (1 << qg_idx);
> > +	for (template_idx = SIG_UL_5G; template_idx <= SIG_UL_5G_LAST;
> > +			template_idx++) {
> > +		/* Check engine power-on status */
> > +		address = HwPfFecUl5gIbDebugReg +
> > +				ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * template_idx;
> > +		status = (acc100_reg_read(d, address) >> 4) & 0xF;
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
> > +				+ BYTES_IN_WORD * template_idx;
> > +		if (status == 1) {
> > +			acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +			numEngines++;
> > +		} else
> > +			acc100_reg_write(d, address, 0);
> > +		#if RTE_ACC100_SINGLE_FEC == 1
> #if should be at start of line

ok

> > +		payload = 0;
> > +		#endif
> > +	}
> > +	printf("Number of 5GUL engines %d\n", numEngines);
> > +	/* 4GDL */
> > +	numQqsAcc += numQgs;
> > +	numQgs	= conf->q_dl_4g.num_qgroups;
> > +	payload = 0;
> > +	for (qg_idx = numQqsAcc; qg_idx < (numQgs + numQqsAcc);
> qg_idx++)
> > +		payload |= (1 << qg_idx);
> > +	for (template_idx = SIG_DL_4G; template_idx <= SIG_DL_4G_LAST;
> > +			template_idx++) {
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
> > +				+ BYTES_IN_WORD*template_idx;
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +		#if RTE_ACC100_SINGLE_FEC == 1
> > +			payload = 0;
> > +		#endif
> > +	}
> > +	/* 5GDL */
> > +	numQqsAcc += numQgs;
> > +	numQgs	= conf->q_dl_5g.num_qgroups;
> > +	payload = 0;
> > +	for (qg_idx = numQqsAcc; qg_idx < (numQgs + numQqsAcc);
> qg_idx++)
> > +		payload |= (1 << qg_idx);
> > +	for (template_idx = SIG_DL_5G; template_idx <= SIG_DL_5G_LAST;
> > +			template_idx++) {
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
> > +				+ BYTES_IN_WORD*template_idx;
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +		#if RTE_ACC100_SINGLE_FEC == 1
> > +		payload = 0;
> > +		#endif
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Queue Group Function mapping */
> > +	int qman_func_id[5] = {0, 2, 1, 3, 4};
> > +	address = HWPfQmgrGrpFunction0;
> > +	payload = 0;
> > +	for (qg_idx = 0; qg_idx < 8; qg_idx++) {
> > +		acc = accFromQgid(qg_idx, conf);
> > +		payload |= qman_func_id[acc]<<(qg_idx * 4);
> > +	}
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* Configuration of the Arbitration QGroup depth to 1 */
> > +	for (qg_idx = 0; qg_idx < totalQgs; qg_idx++) {
> > +		address = HWPfQmgrArbQDepthGrp +
> > +		BYTES_IN_WORD * qg_idx;
> > +		payload = 0;
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Enabling AQueues through the Queue hierarchy*/
> > +	for (vf_idx = 0; vf_idx < ACC100_NUM_VFS; vf_idx++) {
> > +		for (qg_idx = 0; qg_idx < ACC100_NUM_QGRPS; qg_idx++) {
> > +			payload = 0;
> > +			if (vf_idx < conf->num_vf_bundles &&
> > +					qg_idx < totalQgs)
> > +				payload = (1 << aqNum(qg_idx, conf)) - 1;
> > +			address = HWPfQmgrAqEnableVf
> > +					+ vf_idx * BYTES_IN_WORD;
> > +			payload += (qg_idx << 16);
> > +			acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* This pointer to ARAM (256kB) is shifted by 2 (4B per register) */
> > +	uint32_t aram_address = 0;
> > +	for (qg_idx = 0; qg_idx < totalQgs; qg_idx++) {
> > +		for (vf_idx = 0; vf_idx < conf->num_vf_bundles; vf_idx++) {
> > +			address = HWPfQmgrVfBaseAddr + vf_idx
> > +					* BYTES_IN_WORD + qg_idx
> > +					* BYTES_IN_WORD * 64;
> > +			payload = aram_address;
> > +			acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +			/* Offset ARAM Address for next memory bank
> > +			 * - increment of 4B
> > +			 */
> > +			aram_address += aqNum(qg_idx, conf) *
> > +					(1 << aqDepth(qg_idx, conf));
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (aram_address > WORDS_IN_ARAM_SIZE) {
> > +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "ARAM Configuration not fitting %d
> %d\n",
> > +				aram_address, WORDS_IN_ARAM_SIZE);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* ==== HI Configuration ==== */
> > +
> > +	/* Prevent Block on Transmit Error */
> > +	address = HWPfHiBlockTransmitOnErrorEn;
> > +	payload = 0;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +	/* Prevents to drop MSI */
> > +	address = HWPfHiMsiDropEnableReg;
> > +	payload = 0;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +	/* Set the PF Mode register */
> > +	address = HWPfHiPfMode;
> > +	payload = (conf->pf_mode_en) ? 2 : 0;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +	/* Enable Error Detection in HW */
> > +	address = HWPfDmaErrorDetectionEn;
> > +	payload = 0x3D7;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* QoS overflow init */
> > +	payload = 1;
> > +	address = HWPfQosmonAEvalOverflow0;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +	address = HWPfQosmonBEvalOverflow0;
> > +	acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +
> > +	/* HARQ DDR Configuration */
> > +	unsigned int ddrSizeInMb = 512; /* Fixed to 512 MB per VF for now
> */
> > +	for (vf_idx = 0; vf_idx < conf->num_vf_bundles; vf_idx++) {
> > +		address = HWPfDmaVfDdrBaseRw + vf_idx
> > +				* 0x10;
> > +		payload = ((vf_idx * (ddrSizeInMb / 64)) << 16) +
> > +				(ddrSizeInMb - 1);
> > +		acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
> > +	}
> > +	usleep(LONG_WAIT);
> Is sleep needed here ? the reg_write has one.

This one is needed on top

> > +
> 
> Since this seems like a workaround, add a comment here.

fair enough, ok, thanks

> 
> Tom
> 
> > +	if (numEngines < (SIG_UL_5G_LAST + 1))
> > +		poweron_cleanup(bbdev, d, conf);
> > +
> > +	rte_bbdev_log_debug("PF Tip configuration complete for %s",
> dev_name);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > diff --git 
> > a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_pmd_bbdev_acc100_version.map
> > b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_pmd_bbdev_acc100_version.map
> > index 4a76d1d..91c234d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_pmd_bbdev_acc100_version.map
> > +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_pmd_bbdev_acc100_version.map
> > @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> >  DPDK_21 {
> >  	local: *;
> >  };
> > +
> > +EXPERIMENTAL {
> > +	global:
> > +
> > +	acc100_configure;
> > +
> > +};


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-30 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 213+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-19  0:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19  0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/11] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-29  9:44   ` Xu, Rosen
2020-09-04 16:44     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-08-19  0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/11] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-29  9:55   ` Xu, Rosen
2020-08-29 17:39     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-03  2:15       ` Xu, Rosen
2020-09-03  9:17         ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-08-19  0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/11] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19  0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/11] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-29 10:39   ` Xu, Rosen
2020-08-29 17:48     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-03  2:30       ` Xu, Rosen
2020-09-03 22:48         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-04  2:01           ` Xu, Rosen
2020-08-19  0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/11] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-20 14:38   ` Dave Burley
2020-08-20 14:52     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-08-20 14:57       ` Dave Burley
2020-08-20 21:05         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-03  8:06           ` Dave Burley
2020-08-29 11:10   ` Xu, Rosen
2020-08-29 18:01     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-03  2:34       ` Xu, Rosen
2020-09-03  9:09         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-09-03 20:45           ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-15  1:45             ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-15 10:21             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-08-19  0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/11] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19  0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/11] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19  0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 08/11] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19  0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/11] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19  0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 10/11] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-03 10:06   ` Aidan Goddard
2020-09-03 18:53     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-08-19  0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 11/11] doc: update bbdev feature table Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-04 17:53   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-04 17:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/11] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-08  3:10       ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/11] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-15  2:31       ` Xu, Rosen
2020-09-18  2:39       ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/11] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-18  2:47       ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 04/11] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-15  2:31       ` Xu, Rosen
2020-09-18  3:01       ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 05/11] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21  1:40       ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 06/11] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21  1:41       ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 07/11] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21  1:43       ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/11] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21  1:45       ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 09/11] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21  1:46       ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 10/11] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21  1:48       ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 11/11] doc: update bbdev feature table Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21  1:50       ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-21 14:36     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100 Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-22 19:32       ` Akhil Goyal
2020-09-23  2:21         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-23  2:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 01/11] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/11] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 03/11] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 04/11] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 05/11] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 06/11] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 07/11] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 08/11] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 09/11] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 10/11] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 11/11] doc: update bbdev feature table Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/11] service: retrieve lcore active state Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/11] test/service: fix race condition on stopping lcore Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 03/11] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 04/11] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 05/11] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 06/11] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 07/11] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 08/11] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/11] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 10/11] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 11/11] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:24   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:24     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 01/11] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:24     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 02/11] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:24     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 03/11] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:24     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 04/11] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 05/11] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 06/11] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 07/11] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 08/11] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 09/11] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 10/11] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23  2:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 11/11] doc: update bbdev feature table Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 20:19       ` Akhil Goyal
2020-09-29  0:57         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-28 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 00/10] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 01/10] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 02/10] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 03/10] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 04/10] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 05/10] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 06/10] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 07/10] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 08/10] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 09/10] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 10/10] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-29  0:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 00/10] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-29  0:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 01/10] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-29 19:53       ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29 23:17         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-30 23:06           ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 23:30             ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-29  0:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 02/10] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-29 20:34       ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29 23:30         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-30 23:11           ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29  0:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 03/10] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-29 21:13       ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30  0:25         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-30 23:20           ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29  0:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 04/10] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-29 21:46       ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30  1:03         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-30 23:36           ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29  0:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 05/10] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-30 16:53       ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 18:52         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 15:31           ` Tom Rix
2020-10-01 16:07             ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-29  0:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 06/10] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-30 17:25       ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 18:55         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 15:32           ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29  0:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 07/10] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-30 18:37       ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 19:10         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 15:42           ` Tom Rix
2020-10-01 21:46             ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-29  0:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 08/10] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-30 19:03       ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 19:45         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 16:05           ` Tom Rix
2020-10-01 21:07             ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-29  0:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 09/10] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-30 19:16       ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 19:53         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 16:07           ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29  0:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 10/10] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-30 19:58       ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 22:54         ` Chautru, Nicolas [this message]
2020-10-01 16:18           ` Tom Rix
2020-10-01 21:11             ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01  3:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 00/10] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01  3:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 01/10] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01  3:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 02/10] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01  3:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 03/10] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 14:34       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-01 19:50         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01  3:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 04/10] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 15:38       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-01 19:50         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01  3:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 05/10] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01  3:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 06/10] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01  3:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 07/10] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01  3:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 08/10] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01  3:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 09/10] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01  3:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 10/10] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 14:11       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-01 15:36         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 15:43           ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-01 19:50             ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 21:44               ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-02  1:01   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 00/10] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-02  1:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 01/10] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-04 15:53       ` Tom Rix
2020-10-02  1:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 02/10] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-04 15:56       ` Tom Rix
2020-10-02  1:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 03/10] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-04 16:09       ` Tom Rix
2020-10-05 16:38         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-05 22:19           ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-02  1:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 04/10] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-04 16:18       ` Tom Rix
2020-10-05 16:42         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-02  1:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 05/10] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-02  1:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 06/10] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-02  1:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 07/10] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-02  1:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 08/10] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-02  1:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 09/10] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-02  1:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 10/10] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 00/10] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 01/10] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-11-02  9:25       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-02 11:16         ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-05 22:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 02/10] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 03/10] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 04/10] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 05/10] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 06/10] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 07/10] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 08/10] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 09/10] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 10/10] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-06 13:20     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 00/10] bbdev PMD ACC100 Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-06 19:43       ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BY5PR11MB4451515542DE7A0C8E57367EF8330@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=aidan.goddard@accelercomm.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.burley@accelercomm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=rosen.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=tianjiao.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).