Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: remove QoS and pipeline repositories

["Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 2:25 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; david.marchand@redhat.com;
> arybchenko@solarflare.com; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>;
> Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: remove QoS and pipeline
> repositories
> 
> 12/08/2020 14:36, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:07:23AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > The git trees dpdk-next-qos and dpdk-next-pipeline were created
> > > to share the load of patches merging.
> > > It has been decided in the Technical Board that the load is not big
> > > enough to justify keeping these repositories.
> > >
> > > The patches for ethdev TM and MTR will be managed in dpdk-next-net.
> > > The sched and meter libraries will be managed in the main tree.
> > > The packet framework will be managed in the main tree as well.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> >
> > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> 
> Applied, quickly to avoid breaking CI when guessing git tree.
> 
> 
 I am in vacation reading emails every now and then, just saw this.

I am fine with it, as the only purpose of these trees was to sync-up on large pull requests, which was an infrequent event for these trees.

Thomas, thanks for handling this.

Regards,
Cristian