DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
To: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix lcore state bug
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 14:52:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3143C1108734B55D30E26B37D7670@BYAPR11MB3143.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200708133733.29468-1-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 2:38 PM
> To: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob
> <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2] eal: fix lcore state bug
> 
> The rte_service_lcore_reset_all function stops execution of services
> on all lcores and switches them back from ROLE_SERVICE to ROLE_RTE.
> However the thread loop for slave lcores (eal_thread_loop) distincts these
> roles to set lcore state after processing delegated function.
> It sets WAIT state for ROLE_SERVICE, but FINISHED for ROLE_RTE.
> So changing the role to RTE before stopping work in slave lcores
> causes lcores to end in FINISHED state. That is why the rte_eal_lcore_wait
> must be run after rte_service_lcore_reset_all to bring back lcores to
> launchable (WAIT) state.
> This has been fixed in test app and clarified in API documentation.
> 
> Setting the state to WAIT in rte_service_runner_func is premature
> as the rte_service_runner_func function is still a part of the lcore
> function delegated to slave lcore. The state is overwritten anyway in
> slave lcore thread loop. This premature setting state to WAIT might
> however cause rte_eal_lcore_wait, that was called by the application,
> to return before slave lcore thread set the FINISHED state. That's
> why it is removed from librte_eal rte_service_runner_func function.
> 
> Bugzilla ID: 464
> Fixes: 21698354c832 ("service: introduce service cores concept")
> Fixes: f038a81e1c56 ("service: add unit tests")
> Cc: harry.van.haaren@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>

Thanks for v2, applies cleanly. Tested patch with unit tests, bug description,
service_cores sample app, and testpmd running (idle) service cores in bg, all fine;

Acked-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-08 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20200428012204eucas1p120a84e501d0d64145c21476cd2562f36@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2020-04-28  1:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-29  3:11   ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-29 15:07   ` Phil Yang
2020-04-29 21:32     ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-30  2:54       ` Phil Yang
2020-04-30  9:06         ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-08 16:12         ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-08 17:04           ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-18 18:25   ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-18 18:39     ` David Marchand
2020-05-18 18:43       ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-20 11:40         ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-05-20 12:47           ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
     [not found]   ` <CGME20200708133748eucas1p2dbe34d8605d8f618559daee9cbeaa73d@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2020-07-08 13:37     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-07-08 14:52       ` Van Haaren, Harry [this message]
2020-07-08 17:10         ` David Marchand
2020-07-08 19:37           ` Lukasz Wojciechowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR11MB3143C1108734B55D30E26B37D7670@BYAPR11MB3143.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).